Buying vertically farmed produce: Comparison of people with lower and higher stated purchase likelihood

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Sensory Studies Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1111/joss.12832
Gastón Ares, Sok L. Chheang, Sara R. Jaeger
{"title":"Buying vertically farmed produce: Comparison of people with lower and higher stated purchase likelihood","authors":"Gastón Ares,&nbsp;Sok L. Chheang,&nbsp;Sara R. Jaeger","doi":"10.1111/joss.12832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The study explored attitudinal and socio-demographic differences between potential buyers and non-buyers of lettuce grown in a vertical farming (VF) system. Data were collected from people (<i>n</i> = 2193) in four countries—United States, Germany, Singapore, and Australia. Survey results demonstrated a clear link between positive VF attitude and intention to buy, and similarly for negative attitude and intention to not buy. A key difference between people with “lower” and “higher” purchase likelihood (more or less than 50% probability) was that the former were consistently less positive about the benefits of VF. The consumer groups largely perceived the disadvantages of VF similarly. Socio-economic differences between the consumer groups related to country of living and having children below the age of 18 living at home. The latter significantly increased the likelihood that consumers would classify a having “higher” purchase likelihood for VF-grown lettuce. German participants were less likely to have a “higher” purchase likelihood.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practical applications</h3>\n \n <p>Major food system transformations are needed to feed growing global populations and ensure access to heathy diets. Proposed solutions include high-technology production systems that disentangle food production from natural ecosystems. VF is among these; it is an indoor and fully controlled method for crop production. If most consumers are positive towards VF, as past research suggests, it is paramount that they also purchase VF foods. By comparing consumers who are positively and negatively inclined towards purchasing lettuce from VF, the present research identifies children below the age of 18 living in participants' households as a significant predictor of higher intention to purchase. This may be linked to parental concern for their offspring's future lives in a world likely to be impacted by ecological challenges. A likely positive consequence for VF uptake is that children carry forward some of their food-related habits and behaviors into adulthood.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sensory Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joss.12832","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sensory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.12832","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The study explored attitudinal and socio-demographic differences between potential buyers and non-buyers of lettuce grown in a vertical farming (VF) system. Data were collected from people (n = 2193) in four countries—United States, Germany, Singapore, and Australia. Survey results demonstrated a clear link between positive VF attitude and intention to buy, and similarly for negative attitude and intention to not buy. A key difference between people with “lower” and “higher” purchase likelihood (more or less than 50% probability) was that the former were consistently less positive about the benefits of VF. The consumer groups largely perceived the disadvantages of VF similarly. Socio-economic differences between the consumer groups related to country of living and having children below the age of 18 living at home. The latter significantly increased the likelihood that consumers would classify a having “higher” purchase likelihood for VF-grown lettuce. German participants were less likely to have a “higher” purchase likelihood.

Practical applications

Major food system transformations are needed to feed growing global populations and ensure access to heathy diets. Proposed solutions include high-technology production systems that disentangle food production from natural ecosystems. VF is among these; it is an indoor and fully controlled method for crop production. If most consumers are positive towards VF, as past research suggests, it is paramount that they also purchase VF foods. By comparing consumers who are positively and negatively inclined towards purchasing lettuce from VF, the present research identifies children below the age of 18 living in participants' households as a significant predictor of higher intention to purchase. This may be linked to parental concern for their offspring's future lives in a world likely to be impacted by ecological challenges. A likely positive consequence for VF uptake is that children carry forward some of their food-related habits and behaviors into adulthood.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
购买垂直农场的农产品:表示购买可能性较低和较高的人的比较
该研究探讨了在垂直农业(VF)系统中种植的生菜的潜在买家和非买家之间的态度和社会人口差异。数据收集自美国、德国、新加坡和澳大利亚四个国家的人(n = 2193)。调查结果表明,积极的VF态度和购买意愿之间有明显的联系,消极的态度和不购买意愿之间也有类似的联系。“较低”和“较高”购买可能性(高于或低于50%的可能性)的人之间的一个关键区别是,前者对VF的好处一直不太积极。消费者群体基本上也同样认识到VF的缺点。与居住国和有18岁以下儿童住在家里有关的消费群体之间的社会经济差异。后者显著增加了消费者对vf种植的生菜有“更高”购买可能性的可能性。德国参与者不太可能有“更高”的购买可能性。需要对粮食系统进行重大改革,以养活不断增长的全球人口并确保获得健康饮食。提出的解决方案包括将粮食生产与自然生态系统分离的高科技生产系统。VF就是其中之一;它是一种室内的、完全可控的作物生产方法。正如过去的研究表明的那样,如果大多数消费者对VF持积极态度,那么他们也购买VF食品是至关重要的。通过比较积极和消极倾向于从VF购买生菜的消费者,本研究确定了18岁以下的儿童生活在参与者的家庭中,作为更高购买意愿的重要预测因素。这可能与父母担心后代在一个可能受到生态挑战影响的世界中的未来生活有关。摄取VF的一个可能的积极后果是,儿童将他们的一些与食物有关的习惯和行为延续到成年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sensory Studies
Journal of Sensory Studies 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sensory Studies publishes original research and review articles, as well as expository and tutorial papers focusing on observational and experimental studies that lead to development and application of sensory and consumer (including behavior) methods to products such as food and beverage, medical, agricultural, biological, pharmaceutical, cosmetics, or other materials; information such as marketing and consumer information; or improvement of services based on sensory methods. All papers should show some advancement of sensory science in terms of methods. The journal does NOT publish papers that focus primarily on the application of standard sensory techniques to experimental variations in products unless the authors can show a unique application of sensory in an unusual way or in a new product category where sensory methods usually have not been applied.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Correction to “How do consumers with different food neophobia levels react to health and environmental information? A case study on legume-based formulations” Rabitti, N. S., Appiani, M., Proserpio, C., Pagliarini, E., & Laureati, M. (2024). How do consumers with different food neophobia levels react to health and environmental information? A case study on legume-based formulations. Journal of Sensory Studies, 39(3), e12915. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12915 Displaying ingredients on healthy snack packaging: A study on visual attention, choice, and purchase intention Normative cortical activation patterns in children distinguishing one or two tactile sensory inputs points: An functional MRI study Pleasantness of fat flavor is decreased in young adults with high perceived stress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1