“The old order Changeth!” Building sustainable knowledge management post COVID-19 pandemic

IF 2.7 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems Pub Date : 2022-09-23 DOI:10.1108/vjikms-05-2022-0169
D. Dutta, Chaitali Vedak, Harshal Sawant
{"title":"“The old order Changeth!” Building sustainable knowledge management post COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"D. Dutta, Chaitali Vedak, Harshal Sawant","doi":"10.1108/vjikms-05-2022-0169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe global pandemic and the resulting rapid and large-scale digitization changed the way firms recognized and understood knowledge curation and management. The changing nature of work and work systems necessitated changes in knowledge management (KM), some of which are likely to have a long-term impact. Using the lens of technology in practice, the purpose of this study is to examine the impact of technology agency on KM structures and practices that evolved across five knowledge-intensive global organizations. This study then argues that sustainable knowledge management (SKM) systems evolve in specific contexts.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study adopts a qualitative case study design to examine five multinational knowledge-intensive global organizations’ KM systems and practices across diverse industry sectors.\n\n\nFindings\nBased on the findings, the authors develop SKM systems and practices model relevant to a post-pandemic organizational context. The authors argue that KM digitization and adoption support socialization in knowledge sharing. Further formalization through organizational enabling systems aids the externalization of knowledge sharing. Deliberate practices promoted with leadership support are likely to sustain in the post-COVID era. Further, organizations that evolved ad-hoc or idiosyncratic approaches to managing hybrid working are more likely to revert to legacy KM systems. The authors eventually theorize about the socialization of human-to-human and technology-mediated human interactions and develop the three emerging SKM structures.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study contributed to practitioners and researchers by developing the various tenets of SKM.\n","PeriodicalId":45590,"journal":{"name":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-05-2022-0169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The global pandemic and the resulting rapid and large-scale digitization changed the way firms recognized and understood knowledge curation and management. The changing nature of work and work systems necessitated changes in knowledge management (KM), some of which are likely to have a long-term impact. Using the lens of technology in practice, the purpose of this study is to examine the impact of technology agency on KM structures and practices that evolved across five knowledge-intensive global organizations. This study then argues that sustainable knowledge management (SKM) systems evolve in specific contexts. Design/methodology/approach This study adopts a qualitative case study design to examine five multinational knowledge-intensive global organizations’ KM systems and practices across diverse industry sectors. Findings Based on the findings, the authors develop SKM systems and practices model relevant to a post-pandemic organizational context. The authors argue that KM digitization and adoption support socialization in knowledge sharing. Further formalization through organizational enabling systems aids the externalization of knowledge sharing. Deliberate practices promoted with leadership support are likely to sustain in the post-COVID era. Further, organizations that evolved ad-hoc or idiosyncratic approaches to managing hybrid working are more likely to revert to legacy KM systems. The authors eventually theorize about the socialization of human-to-human and technology-mediated human interactions and develop the three emerging SKM structures. Originality/value This study contributed to practitioners and researchers by developing the various tenets of SKM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“旧秩序改变了!”构建COVID-19大流行后的可持续知识管理
目的全球大流行及其带来的快速大规模数字化改变了企业认识和理解知识管理的方式。工作性质和工作系统的变化需要知识管理(KM)的变革,其中一些变革可能会产生长期影响。本研究以实践中的技术为视角,探讨技术代理对五个知识密集型全球组织中知识管理结构和实践的影响。然后,本研究认为可持续知识管理(SKM)系统在特定的环境中发展。设计/方法/方法本研究采用定性案例研究设计,考察了五家跨国知识密集型全球组织在不同行业部门的知识管理系统和实践。基于这些发现,作者开发了与大流行后组织背景相关的SKM系统和实践模型。本文认为,知识的数字化和采用支持了知识共享的社会化。通过组织授权系统的进一步形式化有助于知识共享的外部化。在领导层的支持下,有意推动的做法可能会在后疫情时代持续下去。此外,发展了专门的或特殊的方法来管理混合工作的组织更有可能恢复到遗留的KM系统。作者最终将人与人之间的社会化和技术介导的人际互动理论化,并发展了三个新兴的SKM结构。原创性/价值本研究通过发展SKM的各种原则,为实践者和研究者做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
21.40%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Does ethical climate of the organization foster entrepreneurial marketing? The role of work engagement and effective knowledge transfer Knowledge capitalization and perceived fairness of reward in real estate sector: mediating role of shared leadership Role of artificial intelligence (AI) in poverty alleviation: a bibliometric analysis Adopting knowledge-sharing-driven blockchain technology in healthcare: a developing country’s perspective Knowledge sharing in open-source software development communities: a review and synthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1