Military masculinities on television: Who Dares Wins

IF 2.1 Q2 SOCIOLOGY NORMA Pub Date : 2021-11-26 DOI:10.1080/18902138.2021.2005963
Louise Pears
{"title":"Military masculinities on television: Who Dares Wins","authors":"Louise Pears","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2021.2005963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the UK, people in their millions still tune in to watch ex-soldiers train civilians in an imitation of the SAS selection process in the reality television show SAS: Who Dares Wins. Contestants run drills, jump off cliffs and are subjected to interrogation training; all, to undertake ‘the greatest test of their physical and psychological resilience’. This paper uncovers both the versions of military masculinity that are produced in this show, and what these versions do culturally. Through a critical reading of the five central series (2015–2020), the paper exposes the resilient tropes of military masculinity and military training, including: the ‘no pain no gain, mind over matter, training is hell’, Spartan version of soldiering. It argues that this rearticulation of military masculinity serves to answer particular contemporary cultural anxieties around both the ‘crisis’ in masculinity and the inclusion of women into the regiment. That is not to say there are not incoherencies, ambivalences and complexities introduced; but in the world of the show at least, there is not much that a few more push-ups cannot overcome. SASWDW contributes to the understanding of the symbolic and cultural imaginaries of military masculinities and militarisation and their ongoing significance in British culture.","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":"17 1","pages":"67 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NORMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2021.2005963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the UK, people in their millions still tune in to watch ex-soldiers train civilians in an imitation of the SAS selection process in the reality television show SAS: Who Dares Wins. Contestants run drills, jump off cliffs and are subjected to interrogation training; all, to undertake ‘the greatest test of their physical and psychological resilience’. This paper uncovers both the versions of military masculinity that are produced in this show, and what these versions do culturally. Through a critical reading of the five central series (2015–2020), the paper exposes the resilient tropes of military masculinity and military training, including: the ‘no pain no gain, mind over matter, training is hell’, Spartan version of soldiering. It argues that this rearticulation of military masculinity serves to answer particular contemporary cultural anxieties around both the ‘crisis’ in masculinity and the inclusion of women into the regiment. That is not to say there are not incoherencies, ambivalences and complexities introduced; but in the world of the show at least, there is not much that a few more push-ups cannot overcome. SASWDW contributes to the understanding of the symbolic and cultural imaginaries of military masculinities and militarisation and their ongoing significance in British culture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电视上的军人男子气概:谁敢赢
在英国,数以百万计的人仍然收看电视真人秀节目《SAS:谁敢赢》中模仿SAS选拔过程的退役士兵训练平民。选手们进行训练、跳崖、接受审问训练;所有人都要接受“对他们身体和心理弹性的最大考验”。这篇论文揭示了在这个节目中产生的军人男子气概的两个版本,以及这些版本在文化上的作用。通过对五个中心系列(2015-2020)的批判性阅读,本文揭示了军事男子气概和军事训练的坚韧隐喻,包括:“没有痛苦就没有收获,思想高于物质,训练是地狱”,斯巴达版的士兵。它认为,这种对军事男子气概的重新阐释有助于回答围绕男子气概“危机”和女性加入军团的特定当代文化焦虑。这并不是说不存在不连贯、矛盾和复杂性;但至少在节目的世界里,没有什么是几个俯卧撑不能克服的。SASWDW有助于理解军事男子气概和军事化的象征和文化想象,以及它们在英国文化中的持续意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NORMA
NORMA Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: NORMA is an international journal for high quality research concerning masculinity in its many forms. This is an interdisciplinary journal concerning questions about the body, about social and textual practices, and about men and masculinities in social structures. We aim to advance theory and methods in this field. We hope to present new themes for critical studies of men and masculinities, and develop new approaches to ''intersections'' with race, sexuality, class and coloniality. We are eager to have conversations about the role of men and boys, and the place of masculinities, in achieving gender equality and social equality. The journal was begun in the Nordic region; we now strongly invite scholarly work from all parts of the world, as well as research about transnational relations and spaces. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editors, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is double blind and submission is online via Editorial Manager.
期刊最新文献
Navigating allyship: straight and queer male athlete’s accounts of building alliances Introduction: everyday bordering regimes and transitioning masculinities of racialized migrant men: a case study of the EU Masculine borders as alienation of racialized, undocumented south Asian migrant workers in Greece An affective-discursive analysis of Southern Finnish men’s perspectives on masculinities and femininities in the context of health at work From son to father: memory, fatherhood and migration in the life stories of Muslim men married outside their religious group in Belgium and Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1