Pub Date : 2023-10-30DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2023.2277087
Gabriel Knott-Fayle, Michael Kehler, Brendan Gough
ABSTRACTIn this article, the authors explore the ways that allyship and queer-straight alliance-building are constructed by a group of men who have participated in a men’s health promotion and human rights project to promote inclusion in and through sport. Examining ten participants’ accounts, collected through online semi-structured interviews, we explore the benefits and challenges of alliance-building between privileged and marginalised group members by foregrounding both straight and queer voices and experiences. We conclude with reflections on the challenges encountered in the health and human rights project as indicative of both the limitations and the productive possibilities for (un)learning allyship and developing more ‘horizontal’ forms of alliance-building through highlighting pluralistic voices and experiences.KEYWORDS: Masculinityallyshipsexualitysporthomosociality Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsGabriel Knott-FayleGabriel Knott-Fayle is a Postdoctoral Scholar of Masculinities Studies in Education. His research primarily addresses gender, body image, allyship, masculinities, sport, and communication with a particular interest in challenging prejudice and discrimination. He has previously published work in journals Feminist Media Studies and Feminism & Psychology as well as chapters appearing in edited volumes such as in Gender Diversity and Sport: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Witcomb & Peel 2022).Michael KehlerMichael Kehler is a Research Professor of Masculinities Studies in Education at the Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary. His research addresses: masculinities, men/boys as allies, #MeToo, body image, Health and Physical Education, homophobia and disrupting heteronormative masculinity in education. His research is found in journals and books including Boys’ Bodies; Speaking the Unspoken (Peter Lang); The Problem with Boys’ Education: Beyond the backlash and among journals including: Boyhood Studies: An interdisciplinary journal; International Journal of Men’s Health; Thymos: Journal of Boyhood Studies as well as chapters appearing in Men’s Lives 10th Edition (Oxford Press); The Sociology of Education in Canada: Contemporary Debates and Perspectives (Open University); Child’s Play: Sport in Kids’ Worlds (Rutgers University Press).Brendan GoughProfessor Brendan Gough is a critical social psychologist and qualitative researcher interested in men and masculinities. Now based at Leeds Beckett University, he has published many papers on gender identities and relations, mostly in the context of health, lifestyles and wellbeing. Prof. Gough is co-founder and co-editor of the journal Qualitative Research in Psychology; he is Editor-in-chief of the journal Social & Personality Psychology Compass, and was associate editor for the journal Psychology of Men and Masculinities (2014–2021). In 2016 he was awarded a fellowship of the
在这篇文章中,作者探讨了一群参与男性健康促进和人权项目的男性如何构建盟友关系和同性恋-异性恋联盟,以促进体育包容。通过在线半结构化访谈收集的十位参与者的描述,我们探讨了通过突出异性恋和酷儿的声音和经历,在特权和边缘化群体成员之间建立联盟的好处和挑战。最后,我们对健康和人权项目中遇到的挑战进行了反思,这些挑战表明(联合国)学习结盟和通过强调多元化的声音和经验发展更“横向”的联盟建设形式的局限性和生产性可能性。关键词:男性气质、船舶性别、体育、社会行为披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。作者简介:gabriel Knott-Fayle是一位从事教育领域男性研究的博士后学者。他的研究主要涉及性别、身体形象、盟友关系、男子气概、体育和沟通,并对挑战偏见和歧视特别感兴趣。他曾在《女权主义媒体研究》和《女权主义与心理学》等期刊上发表过作品,并在《性别多样性与体育:跨学科视角》(Witcomb & Peel 2022)等编辑卷中发表过章节。Michael Kehler是卡尔加里大学Werklund教育学院男性教育研究的研究教授。他的研究涉及:男性气质、男性/男孩作为盟友、#MeToo、身体形象、健康与体育、同性恋恐惧症和在教育中破坏异性恋规范的男性气质。他的研究发表在期刊和书籍上,包括《男孩的身体》;《说出心里话》(彼得·朗);男孩教育的问题:在强烈反对和期刊之间,包括:少年时代研究:一个跨学科期刊;国际男子健康杂志;胸腺:少年时代研究杂志以及出现在男性生活第10版(牛津出版社)的章节;加拿大教育社会学:当代辩论和观点(开放大学);儿童游戏:儿童世界中的运动(罗格斯大学出版社)。Brendan Gough教授是一位对男性和男性气质感兴趣的批判性社会心理学家和定性研究员。他目前在利兹贝克特大学(Leeds Beckett University)工作,发表了许多关于性别认同和性别关系的论文,主要涉及健康、生活方式和幸福。高夫教授是《心理学定性研究》(Qualitative Research in Psychology)杂志的联合创始人和联合编辑;他是《社会与人格心理学指南》杂志的主编,也是《男性与男子气概心理学》杂志的副主编(2014-2021)。2016年,他被授予社会科学院院士。
{"title":"Navigating allyship: straight and queer male athlete’s accounts of building alliances","authors":"Gabriel Knott-Fayle, Michael Kehler, Brendan Gough","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2023.2277087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2023.2277087","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn this article, the authors explore the ways that allyship and queer-straight alliance-building are constructed by a group of men who have participated in a men’s health promotion and human rights project to promote inclusion in and through sport. Examining ten participants’ accounts, collected through online semi-structured interviews, we explore the benefits and challenges of alliance-building between privileged and marginalised group members by foregrounding both straight and queer voices and experiences. We conclude with reflections on the challenges encountered in the health and human rights project as indicative of both the limitations and the productive possibilities for (un)learning allyship and developing more ‘horizontal’ forms of alliance-building through highlighting pluralistic voices and experiences.KEYWORDS: Masculinityallyshipsexualitysporthomosociality Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsGabriel Knott-FayleGabriel Knott-Fayle is a Postdoctoral Scholar of Masculinities Studies in Education. His research primarily addresses gender, body image, allyship, masculinities, sport, and communication with a particular interest in challenging prejudice and discrimination. He has previously published work in journals Feminist Media Studies and Feminism & Psychology as well as chapters appearing in edited volumes such as in Gender Diversity and Sport: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Witcomb & Peel 2022).Michael KehlerMichael Kehler is a Research Professor of Masculinities Studies in Education at the Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary. His research addresses: masculinities, men/boys as allies, #MeToo, body image, Health and Physical Education, homophobia and disrupting heteronormative masculinity in education. His research is found in journals and books including Boys’ Bodies; Speaking the Unspoken (Peter Lang); The Problem with Boys’ Education: Beyond the backlash and among journals including: Boyhood Studies: An interdisciplinary journal; International Journal of Men’s Health; Thymos: Journal of Boyhood Studies as well as chapters appearing in Men’s Lives 10th Edition (Oxford Press); The Sociology of Education in Canada: Contemporary Debates and Perspectives (Open University); Child’s Play: Sport in Kids’ Worlds (Rutgers University Press).Brendan GoughProfessor Brendan Gough is a critical social psychologist and qualitative researcher interested in men and masculinities. Now based at Leeds Beckett University, he has published many papers on gender identities and relations, mostly in the context of health, lifestyles and wellbeing. Prof. Gough is co-founder and co-editor of the journal Qualitative Research in Psychology; he is Editor-in-chief of the journal Social & Personality Psychology Compass, and was associate editor for the journal Psychology of Men and Masculinities (2014–2021). In 2016 he was awarded a fellowship of the","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136023256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-11DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2023.2263104
Reena Kukreja
The introduction to the Special Issue (SI) presents the collection’s theorization on the impact of everyday, micro-level borders that are propelled by discourses of Islamophobia, racism, and ethno-nationalism related to racialized migrant men’s masculinities in the European Union (EU). Along with the increased movement of racialized (Muslim) men to the EU’s shores have come crisis narratives about their otherness to b/order them. These borders operate in everyday encounters between migrant men and local communities as much as between groups of migrant men themselves, whether it is in the realm of livelihood strategies, romantic desires, assertions about sexuality and sexual identity, homosocial interactions, or friendships. This SI uses the frame of ‘transitions’ to interrogate how transitions in masculinities and masculine self-perceptions are shaped by b/ordering that is enacted every day and in the everyday against racialized migrant men. It argues that masculinized Islamophobia and masculine border(ing) thicken borders between these men and the natives to justify the men’s migrant (un)deservingness. The SI also brings into discussion strategies of masculine resistance and refusal that b/ordered men undertake through enactment and embodiment of caring masculinities or by their refusal to subscribe to norms of hegemonic masculinity.
{"title":"Introduction: everyday bordering regimes and transitioning masculinities of racialized migrant men: a case study of the EU","authors":"Reena Kukreja","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2023.2263104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2023.2263104","url":null,"abstract":"The introduction to the Special Issue (SI) presents the collection’s theorization on the impact of everyday, micro-level borders that are propelled by discourses of Islamophobia, racism, and ethno-nationalism related to racialized migrant men’s masculinities in the European Union (EU). Along with the increased movement of racialized (Muslim) men to the EU’s shores have come crisis narratives about their otherness to b/order them. These borders operate in everyday encounters between migrant men and local communities as much as between groups of migrant men themselves, whether it is in the realm of livelihood strategies, romantic desires, assertions about sexuality and sexual identity, homosocial interactions, or friendships. This SI uses the frame of ‘transitions’ to interrogate how transitions in masculinities and masculine self-perceptions are shaped by b/ordering that is enacted every day and in the everyday against racialized migrant men. It argues that masculinized Islamophobia and masculine border(ing) thicken borders between these men and the natives to justify the men’s migrant (un)deservingness. The SI also brings into discussion strategies of masculine resistance and refusal that b/ordered men undertake through enactment and embodiment of caring masculinities or by their refusal to subscribe to norms of hegemonic masculinity.","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136097495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-18DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2023.2260291
Reena Kukreja
ABSTRACTBangladeshi, Indian, and Pakistani low-class male migrants in Greece are marked by migrant precarity due to their undocumented status and by a flattened South Asian racialised masculine identity. Collectively othered, they struggle with symbolic borders created by colonial and postcolonial encounters, national identities, religion, and masculine expectations. This article explores how ideologies of prejudice and divisiveness in Greece work in tandem with articulations of othering and national (un)belonging from the men’s home countries to define both their interpersonal relationships and labour outcomes in Greece. It proposes the concept of ‘masculine borders’ to describe processes through which culturally specific masculinities of South Asian men are (re)produced or reconfigured relationally and hierarchically to each other by the capitalist project with the aim of alienating and discipling workers. With such everyday bordering discourses, a novel articulation of Marxian alienation of workers from each other emerges. In this case, masculine norms mesh with Islamophobia and racism to thicken masculine borders between Bangladeshi, Pakistani, and Indian men, assisting in the efficient accumulation of surplus by the capitalist class.KEYWORDS: Greeceborderingracismalienation of labourmasculine borders AcknowledgementsI am grateful to Ardis Ingvars for proposing a seminar on bordering regimes and masculinities in transition of racialized migrant men in Reykjavik and the Department of Sociology, University of Iceland, and RIKK-Institute for Gender, Equality and Difference for hosting it. Thanks to the working group of the special issue for their thoughtful questions and insights and to Paritosh Kumar, Angela Pietrobon, Laddu and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. I would also like to thank all the migrant men who took valuable time out of their work to share their life stories with me.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Alienation is also evident in the gig economy, where the very nature of platform work and labour control isolates workers from each other and thus creates powerlessness; see Glavin, Bierman, and Schieman (Citation2021) for details.Additional informationFundingThis work was funded by SSHRC Insight Development Grant, award no 430-2020-00040, the Fund for Scholarly Research and Creative Work and Professional Development (Adjuncts), and SSHRC Institutional Grant, Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada.Notes on contributorsReena KukrejaReena Kukreja is Assistant Professor in the Department of Global Development Studies at Queen’s University. She is cross-appointed to the Department of Gender Studies and the Cultural Studies Program at Queen’s University. She divides time between teaching, research, and filmmaking. She has published in journals such as Geoforum, Gender & Society, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Men & Mascul
{"title":"Masculine borders as alienation of racialized, undocumented south Asian migrant workers in Greece","authors":"Reena Kukreja","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2023.2260291","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2023.2260291","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBangladeshi, Indian, and Pakistani low-class male migrants in Greece are marked by migrant precarity due to their undocumented status and by a flattened South Asian racialised masculine identity. Collectively othered, they struggle with symbolic borders created by colonial and postcolonial encounters, national identities, religion, and masculine expectations. This article explores how ideologies of prejudice and divisiveness in Greece work in tandem with articulations of othering and national (un)belonging from the men’s home countries to define both their interpersonal relationships and labour outcomes in Greece. It proposes the concept of ‘masculine borders’ to describe processes through which culturally specific masculinities of South Asian men are (re)produced or reconfigured relationally and hierarchically to each other by the capitalist project with the aim of alienating and discipling workers. With such everyday bordering discourses, a novel articulation of Marxian alienation of workers from each other emerges. In this case, masculine norms mesh with Islamophobia and racism to thicken masculine borders between Bangladeshi, Pakistani, and Indian men, assisting in the efficient accumulation of surplus by the capitalist class.KEYWORDS: Greeceborderingracismalienation of labourmasculine borders AcknowledgementsI am grateful to Ardis Ingvars for proposing a seminar on bordering regimes and masculinities in transition of racialized migrant men in Reykjavik and the Department of Sociology, University of Iceland, and RIKK-Institute for Gender, Equality and Difference for hosting it. Thanks to the working group of the special issue for their thoughtful questions and insights and to Paritosh Kumar, Angela Pietrobon, Laddu and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. I would also like to thank all the migrant men who took valuable time out of their work to share their life stories with me.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Alienation is also evident in the gig economy, where the very nature of platform work and labour control isolates workers from each other and thus creates powerlessness; see Glavin, Bierman, and Schieman (Citation2021) for details.Additional informationFundingThis work was funded by SSHRC Insight Development Grant, award no 430-2020-00040, the Fund for Scholarly Research and Creative Work and Professional Development (Adjuncts), and SSHRC Institutional Grant, Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada.Notes on contributorsReena KukrejaReena Kukreja is Assistant Professor in the Department of Global Development Studies at Queen’s University. She is cross-appointed to the Department of Gender Studies and the Cultural Studies Program at Queen’s University. She divides time between teaching, research, and filmmaking. She has published in journals such as Geoforum, Gender & Society, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Men & Mascul","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135149166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-11DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2023.2251345
Francesco Cerchiaro
ABSTRACT Based on biographical interviews held in Italy and Belgium with migrant-Muslim men married outside their own religious group, the article argues for the importance of including memory as part of the theoretical framework in which to locate and interpret migrant fatherhood. Looking at mixedness as a social laboratory in which to study the intersection of gender, migration and parenthood, the findings suggest that the rupture with the polygamous model of their fathers lay behind the decision of some of these men to marry a woman from the majority group and adhere to the model of fatherhood of the new country of settlement. However, for the majority of the participants, the findings demonstrate that fatherhood is much more complex than the dominant binary division between traditional and Western models of fatherhood assume. These fathers experience ambivalent emotions and constantly struggle in mediating their double presences and absences as fathers: on the one hand, they have established, thanks to the native partner, a privileged closer relationship with the new context, but, on the other, they may experience a sense of ‘dissonance’ in the management of their masculinity and of ‘loss’ in the transmission of the self to their children.
{"title":"From son to father: memory, fatherhood and migration in the life stories of Muslim men married outside their religious group in Belgium and Italy","authors":"Francesco Cerchiaro","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2023.2251345","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2023.2251345","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Based on biographical interviews held in Italy and Belgium with migrant-Muslim men married outside their own religious group, the article argues for the importance of including memory as part of the theoretical framework in which to locate and interpret migrant fatherhood. Looking at mixedness as a social laboratory in which to study the intersection of gender, migration and parenthood, the findings suggest that the rupture with the polygamous model of their fathers lay behind the decision of some of these men to marry a woman from the majority group and adhere to the model of fatherhood of the new country of settlement. However, for the majority of the participants, the findings demonstrate that fatherhood is much more complex than the dominant binary division between traditional and Western models of fatherhood assume. These fathers experience ambivalent emotions and constantly struggle in mediating their double presences and absences as fathers: on the one hand, they have established, thanks to the native partner, a privileged closer relationship with the new context, but, on the other, they may experience a sense of ‘dissonance’ in the management of their masculinity and of ‘loss’ in the transmission of the self to their children.","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135980507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-11DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2023.2251347
Stephen Damianos
ABSTRACT Over a period of eight years, in order to apply for asylum on mainland Greece most applicants had to first pre-register by calling the Greek Asylum Service on Skype. Due to issues of capacity and political will, the Skype calls were most frequently ignored, and applicants often continued calling without response every week for months to years in the hopes of receiving international protection, documentation, and social benefits. This paper explores the experiences of a handful of men who called on Skype with no response and decided to exit the system. In particular, it theorizes these exits as political acts of refusal that generate new possibilities of masculine self. Building upon doctoral fieldwork conducted in Athens, Greece, the paper discusses the challenges posed to masculinity by a technologized border regime that forced individuals to face digitalized alienation and erasure, considering the strategies that men employed to contest the system and safeguard their masculinities. The article contributes to refugee studies, critical studies of men and masculinities, and studies of digital bordering.
{"title":"‘I want to own myself:’ digital bordering, migrant masculinities, and the politics of refusal","authors":"Stephen Damianos","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2023.2251347","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2023.2251347","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\u0000 Over a period of eight years, in order to apply for asylum on mainland Greece most applicants had to first pre-register by calling the Greek Asylum Service on Skype. Due to issues of capacity and political will, the Skype calls were most frequently ignored, and applicants often continued calling without response every week for months to years in the hopes of receiving international protection, documentation, and social benefits. This paper explores the experiences of a handful of men who called on Skype with no response and decided to exit the system. In particular, it theorizes these exits as political acts of refusal that generate new possibilities of masculine self. Building upon doctoral fieldwork conducted in Athens, Greece, the paper discusses the challenges posed to masculinity by a technologized border regime that forced individuals to face digitalized alienation and erasure, considering the strategies that men employed to contest the system and safeguard their masculinities. The article contributes to refugee studies, critical studies of men and masculinities, and studies of digital bordering.","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135981614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-11DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2023.2249365
Henri Hyvönen
{"title":"An affective-discursive analysis of Southern Finnish men’s perspectives on masculinities and femininities in the context of health at work","authors":"Henri Hyvönen","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2023.2249365","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2023.2249365","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135938554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-06DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2023.2254184
Thi Gammon
{"title":"Resistance to a gender threat: a case-study analysis of Vietnamese viewers’ unfavourable reception of soft masculinities in romantic Korean television dramas","authors":"Thi Gammon","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2023.2254184","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2023.2254184","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47586504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-05DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2023.2251346
Dany Carnassale
ABSTRACT The article focuses on the transnational trajectories of Senegalese MSM (men having sex with other men) living in northern Italy. It highlights how these individuals creatively adapt or challenge their masculinity and sexuality, taking into consideration the dominant gender norms prevailing in both Senegal and Italy. In Senegal, homoerotic practices are officially condemned, while in Italy they are frequently the source of overlapping discriminations. By looking at the experiences of Senegalese MSM, the article looks at how concrete and symbolic borders may be built and contested, but also how transnational trajectories actively contribute to challenging the hegemonic forms of masculinity in many aspects of everyday life.
{"title":"Undoing the boundaries of heteronormative masculinity. Transnational experiences of Senegalese MSM living in Italy","authors":"Dany Carnassale","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2023.2251346","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2023.2251346","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The article focuses on the transnational trajectories of Senegalese MSM (men having sex with other men) living in northern Italy. It highlights how these individuals creatively adapt or challenge their masculinity and sexuality, taking into consideration the dominant gender norms prevailing in both Senegal and Italy. In Senegal, homoerotic practices are officially condemned, while in Italy they are frequently the source of overlapping discriminations. By looking at the experiences of Senegalese MSM, the article looks at how concrete and symbolic borders may be built and contested, but also how transnational trajectories actively contribute to challenging the hegemonic forms of masculinity in many aspects of everyday life.","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42088931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-04DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2023.2251349
Árdís K. Ingvars
ABSTRACT This article explores how former refugee men position their desirability as they un-settle in European countries. The masculine performance of desirability is examined through the intersectional lens of racialization, affective bordering, sexualities, and erotic encounters. The paper builds on multi-sited ethnographies, conducted mainly in Greece and Germany between 2012 and 2022, centred around masculinities in border activist movements. During first encounters, the men in this study would position themselves as autonomous desirable beings. However, they quickly experienced dismissal or sexual objectifications. They were sexually desired as exotic but discarded as potential life partners, due to the lack of aspirational labour and uncertain legal status. Thus, their beings became depleted in the technologies of the white desire that exploits marked bodies. In affective response, they negotiated the terms of their recognition. Their tactics included shaming women’s choices, deflating local men’s hegemony, forming reciprocal contracts, and visioning love in the future. This pattern continued through men’s engagements across European borders and was repetitive. Therefore, I argue that they performed a ‘poetic desirability’ to position their masculine beings as equal and in resistance to the bordering violence of white (un)desire.
{"title":"Poetic desirability: refugee men’s border tactics against white desire","authors":"Árdís K. Ingvars","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2023.2251349","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2023.2251349","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores how former refugee men position their desirability as they un-settle in European countries. The masculine performance of desirability is examined through the intersectional lens of racialization, affective bordering, sexualities, and erotic encounters. The paper builds on multi-sited ethnographies, conducted mainly in Greece and Germany between 2012 and 2022, centred around masculinities in border activist movements. During first encounters, the men in this study would position themselves as autonomous desirable beings. However, they quickly experienced dismissal or sexual objectifications. They were sexually desired as exotic but discarded as potential life partners, due to the lack of aspirational labour and uncertain legal status. Thus, their beings became depleted in the technologies of the white desire that exploits marked bodies. In affective response, they negotiated the terms of their recognition. Their tactics included shaming women’s choices, deflating local men’s hegemony, forming reciprocal contracts, and visioning love in the future. This pattern continued through men’s engagements across European borders and was repetitive. Therefore, I argue that they performed a ‘poetic desirability’ to position their masculine beings as equal and in resistance to the bordering violence of white (un)desire.","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43281858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2023.2251351
Andreas Henriksson, Ulf Mellström, Andrea Priori, Katarzyna Wojnicka
The article presents results from an interview study on migrant bachelors and discusses di ff erences between Bangladeshi migrants in Italy and Syrian migrants in Sweden, in how they present as singles. Interviewees articulate a simpli fi ed distinction between singlehood in Europe and singlehood in Bangladesh or Syria. Singlehood has been theorized as wavering between a period of waiting and a lifestyle with its own inherent value. In our sample, while Bangladeshis describe bachelorhood as a period of waiting, distancing themselves from what they see as European singlehood, Syrians tend to embrace singlehood as inherently valuable and prefer a ‘ European way ’ of being single. We argue that this di ff erence between the groups is connected not primarily to national or regional cultures, but to how racialized borders shape the two groups in Europe, as well as to the role of class positionalities in determining attitudes toward singlehood.
{"title":"Waiting or dating? Migrant bachelors in the European borderscapes","authors":"Andreas Henriksson, Ulf Mellström, Andrea Priori, Katarzyna Wojnicka","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2023.2251351","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2023.2251351","url":null,"abstract":"The article presents results from an interview study on migrant bachelors and discusses di ff erences between Bangladeshi migrants in Italy and Syrian migrants in Sweden, in how they present as singles. Interviewees articulate a simpli fi ed distinction between singlehood in Europe and singlehood in Bangladesh or Syria. Singlehood has been theorized as wavering between a period of waiting and a lifestyle with its own inherent value. In our sample, while Bangladeshis describe bachelorhood as a period of waiting, distancing themselves from what they see as European singlehood, Syrians tend to embrace singlehood as inherently valuable and prefer a ‘ European way ’ of being single. We argue that this di ff erence between the groups is connected not primarily to national or regional cultures, but to how racialized borders shape the two groups in Europe, as well as to the role of class positionalities in determining attitudes toward singlehood.","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41905638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}