The (UK) Freedom of Information Act’s disclosure process is broken: where do we go from here?

Henry Pearce
{"title":"The (UK) Freedom of Information Act’s disclosure process is broken: where do we go from here?","authors":"Henry Pearce","doi":"10.1080/13600834.2020.1785663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article builds on previous literature in the data protection and freedom and information field, which has argued that the ‘release and forget’ disclosure model utilised by the (UK) Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) is unfit for purpose in the context of personal data that have been subject to a process of anonymisation, and that reform is necessary. Rather than outlining a detailed proposal for reform, the article intends to stoke debate in this area by highlighting a range of issues and factors that could help inform discussions regarding what shape any reform of the FOIA’s disclosure model should take. The article argues that the notions of privacy and data protection by design, data licensing, risk, contextual controls, metadata, and privacy enhancing technologies, should all have a role to play in respect of improving how anonymised data are disclosed under the FOIA.","PeriodicalId":44342,"journal":{"name":"Information & Communications Technology Law","volume":"29 1","pages":"354 - 390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600834.2020.1785663","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Communications Technology Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2020.1785663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article builds on previous literature in the data protection and freedom and information field, which has argued that the ‘release and forget’ disclosure model utilised by the (UK) Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) is unfit for purpose in the context of personal data that have been subject to a process of anonymisation, and that reform is necessary. Rather than outlining a detailed proposal for reform, the article intends to stoke debate in this area by highlighting a range of issues and factors that could help inform discussions regarding what shape any reform of the FOIA’s disclosure model should take. The article argues that the notions of privacy and data protection by design, data licensing, risk, contextual controls, metadata, and privacy enhancing technologies, should all have a role to play in respect of improving how anonymised data are disclosed under the FOIA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(英国)《信息自由法》的披露程序被打破了:我们该何去何从?
摘要本文建立在数据保护、自由和信息领域的先前文献的基础上,这些文献认为,(英国)《2000年信息自由法》(FOIA)所使用的“发布和忘记”披露模式不适合用于经过匿名化过程的个人数据,因此有必要进行改革。这篇文章没有概述详细的改革建议,而是打算通过强调一系列问题和因素来引发这一领域的辩论,这些问题和因素可能有助于就《信息自由法》披露模式的任何改革应该采取何种形式进行讨论。文章认为,设计、数据许可、风险、上下文控制、元数据和隐私增强技术的隐私和数据保护概念,都应该在改善《信息自由法》下匿名数据的披露方式方面发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The last decade has seen the introduction of computers and information technology at many levels of human transaction. Information technology (IT) is now used for data collation, in daily commercial transactions like transfer of funds, conclusion of contract, and complex diagnostic purposes in fields such as law, medicine and transport. The use of IT has expanded rapidly with the introduction of multimedia and the Internet. Any new technology inevitably raises a number of questions ranging from the legal to the ethical and the social. Information & Communications Technology Law covers topics such as: the implications of IT for legal processes and legal decision-making and related ethical and social issues.
期刊最新文献
When objects betray you: the Internet of Things and the privilege against self-incrimination From object obfuscation to contextually-dependent identification: enhancing automated privacy protection in street-level image platforms (SLIPs) Balancing the autonomy and protection of children: competency challenges in data protection law Fidelity in legal coding: applying legal translation frameworks to address interpretive challenges The role of corporate social responsibility in the regulation of OTT platforms: the case of film industry and Turkish corporate law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1