{"title":"Everyday Europe and Tomorrow's Europe: Is There a Future for Social Transnationalism? A Response to Readers","authors":"A. Favell, E. Recchi","doi":"10.1285/I20356609V13I1P883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We thank our respondents for a set of very interesting commentaries As with our own text, these thoughts and insights have themselves inevitably been overtaken by events outside our immediate academic control As we write, the world has been enveloped in a pandemic that apparently strikes at the heart of globalisation (as it was), after a decade in which the growing threat of impending or emergent crises to it has been heavily signalled on all sides Ironically — in terms of our core concerns — the present crisis, itself a truly global event, clearly intertwines with the mobilities and transactions that most defined our now lost era A disease that has spread through expansive human travel and unconstrained human interaction has been tackled everywhere with immobility and social lockdown Most likely, mobilities — and Europe itself — will not be the same after the coronavirus and the new and revised forms of governance it has imposed Just how different it will be remains to be seen It may not be right just yet to lament Die Welt von Gestern in despairing Stefan Zweig-like mode (Zweig 1942), but surely neither can we count on Europe or the world going back to “business as usual” Nearly everything everywhere currently seems to be defaulting to highlybounded, primarily nationalised forms of governance, that may well veer towards extreme nationalist governmentality and even eugenics depending on the severity of the crisis The pandemic is thus raising echoes of the Dark Continent—that is, Europe’s dismal pre-1945 past (see Mazower’s prescient work, 1998)—as well as many revived utopian ideas about community, collective responsibility, ecological consciousness, or a new and proactive focus on welfare coverage and public health We will not be able to adjudicate on all this, but these stakes do need to be evoked What is clear is that Everyday Europe, which was published in early 2019, written 2015 to 2019, and based on research conducted from 2010 to 2014, will now assuredly be a timepiece, the portrait of a decade and a lost world But for that reason its chapters and its readers’ responses may have a great value in specifying the extent to which mobilities and cross-border “social transnationalism”, as we call it, had transformed and was transforming the continent before the fateful year 2020 It may then become a yardstick of what we are losing as we speak","PeriodicalId":45168,"journal":{"name":"Partecipazione e Conflitto","volume":"13 1","pages":"883-895"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Partecipazione e Conflitto","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1285/I20356609V13I1P883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
We thank our respondents for a set of very interesting commentaries As with our own text, these thoughts and insights have themselves inevitably been overtaken by events outside our immediate academic control As we write, the world has been enveloped in a pandemic that apparently strikes at the heart of globalisation (as it was), after a decade in which the growing threat of impending or emergent crises to it has been heavily signalled on all sides Ironically — in terms of our core concerns — the present crisis, itself a truly global event, clearly intertwines with the mobilities and transactions that most defined our now lost era A disease that has spread through expansive human travel and unconstrained human interaction has been tackled everywhere with immobility and social lockdown Most likely, mobilities — and Europe itself — will not be the same after the coronavirus and the new and revised forms of governance it has imposed Just how different it will be remains to be seen It may not be right just yet to lament Die Welt von Gestern in despairing Stefan Zweig-like mode (Zweig 1942), but surely neither can we count on Europe or the world going back to “business as usual” Nearly everything everywhere currently seems to be defaulting to highlybounded, primarily nationalised forms of governance, that may well veer towards extreme nationalist governmentality and even eugenics depending on the severity of the crisis The pandemic is thus raising echoes of the Dark Continent—that is, Europe’s dismal pre-1945 past (see Mazower’s prescient work, 1998)—as well as many revived utopian ideas about community, collective responsibility, ecological consciousness, or a new and proactive focus on welfare coverage and public health We will not be able to adjudicate on all this, but these stakes do need to be evoked What is clear is that Everyday Europe, which was published in early 2019, written 2015 to 2019, and based on research conducted from 2010 to 2014, will now assuredly be a timepiece, the portrait of a decade and a lost world But for that reason its chapters and its readers’ responses may have a great value in specifying the extent to which mobilities and cross-border “social transnationalism”, as we call it, had transformed and was transforming the continent before the fateful year 2020 It may then become a yardstick of what we are losing as we speak
我们感谢受访者提供的一系列非常有趣的评论。正如我们自己的文本一样,这些想法和见解本身不可避免地被我们直接学术控制之外的事件所取代。在我们写作的过程中,世界被一场疫情所笼罩,这场疫情显然袭击了全球化的核心(事实上),十年来,各方都强烈表示,即将发生或紧急发生的危机对它的威胁越来越大。具有讽刺意味的是,就我们的核心关切而言,当前的危机本身就是一个真正的全球性事件,显然与流动性和交易交织在一起,这些流动性和事务最能定义我们现在已经失去的时代。一种通过广泛的人类旅行和不受约束的人类互动传播的疾病已经通过不动和社会封锁在各地得到了解决。很可能,在新冠病毒及其实施的新的和修订的治理形式之后,流动性——以及欧洲本身——将不一样。它将有多大的不同还有待观察。以斯特凡·茨威格式的绝望模式哀叹《世界报》(Die Welt von Gestern)可能还不对(茨威格1942),但毫无疑问,我们也不能指望欧洲或世界恢复“一切如常”。目前,几乎所有地方似乎都在默认高度受限、主要是国有化的治理形式,这很可能会转向极端的民族主义治理,甚至优生学,这取决于危机的严重程度。因此,这场疫情引发了对黑暗大陆的回声,也就是欧洲1945年前惨淡的过去(见马佐尔的先见之明,1998年),以及许多关于社区、集体责任、生态意识,或者对福利覆盖和公共卫生的新的积极关注我们将无法对这一切做出裁决,但这些利害关系确实需要引起重视。很明显,2019年初出版、2015年至2019年撰写、基于2010年至2014年进行的研究的《每日欧洲》现在肯定会成为一个时计,十年和失落世界的写照但正因为如此,它的章节和读者的反应可能有很大的价值,可以具体说明我们所说的流动性和跨境“社会跨国主义”在2020年之前已经和正在改变非洲大陆的程度
期刊介绍:
PArtecipazione e COnflitto [PArticipation and COnflict] is an International Journal based in Italy specialized in social and political studies. PACO houses research and studies on the transformations of politics and its key players (political parties, interest groups, social movements, associations, unions, etc.), focusing in particular on the dynamics of participation both by individuals acting in conventional ways, and by those who prefer protest-oriented repertoires of action. Special attention is also paid to the dynamics of transformation of contemporary political systems, with an eye fixed on the processes of democratization besides on the spaces opening to the new forms of governance both at local and sub-national, and supra-national level. All are inscribed in that complex phenomenon represented by the trans-nationalization of social, political and economic processes, without neglecting the nation-state dimension. The journal emphasizes innovative studies and research of high methodological rigor, treasuring of the most recent theoretical and empirical contributions in social and political sciences.