The Kyivan Rus Version of Ukrainian Genesis. Arguments For and Against

L. Zalizniak
{"title":"The Kyivan Rus Version of Ukrainian Genesis. Arguments For and Against","authors":"L. Zalizniak","doi":"10.30840/2413-7065.1(86).2023.275329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"National history is the core of the formation of national consciousness, the strength of which determines the viability of the nation. The birth of the national history subject is one of its key problems, without whose solution the successful building of a modern Ukrainian nation is impossible. In addition to the three main versions of the origin of Ukrainians (Trypillia, early mediaeval, and late mediaeval), some Ukrainian researchers propose the so-called Kyivan Rus concept of Ukrainian genesis.The article presents a critical analysis of the Kyivan Rus concept of the birth of the Ukrainian nation. Vasyl Balushok, who has published two monographs touching the issue of the ethnogenesis of Ukrainians, is its most active supporter among modern domestic researchers. In them, the researcher examines in detail the main aspects of the Kyivan Rus version of the origin of Ukrainians. Therefore, the basis of the article is the analysis of two of his monographic studies, which provide a fairly complete picture of the current state of the problem of the Ukrainian ethnic group origin from Kyivan Rus.Balushok believes that the formation of the Ukrainian ethnos took place in Rus state and ended at the turn of the 12th and 13th centuries. The main shortcoming of V. Balushok's version of Ukrainaian genesis is the researcher's failure to recognise the first, tribal phase of the formation of Ruthenians-Ukrainians. It covers the entire early Middle Ages from the end of the 5th to the 10th centuries, when the Ukrainian ethnos consisted of related proto-Ukrainian tribes: Antes, Sklavens, Dulebs, Polans, Drevlians, Volhynians, Ulychis, Tivertsi, Croats. The latter consolidated into an aristocratic nation of Ruthenians-Ukrainians in the state of Rus during the 10th–13th centuries.The ethnogenesis of Ukrainians took place within the framework of the universal laws of the ethnohistorical development of the peoples of the middle part of Europe: Englishmen, Spaniards, Frenchmen, Romanians, Czechs, Poles, Serbs, Croats, Ruthenians-Ukrainians, etc. All of them went through three main phases of development: 1. The tribal period of the early Middle Ages (5th–9th centuries); 2. Aristocratic nations of the developed and late Middle Ages (10th–16th centuries); 3. Modern nations of the new and modern times (17th–21st centuries). V. Balushok's non-recognition of the tribal phase of Ukrainian genesis contradicts the specified universal laws of the development of the great ethnic groups of Europe.","PeriodicalId":52730,"journal":{"name":"Ukrayinoznavstvo","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrayinoznavstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30840/2413-7065.1(86).2023.275329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

National history is the core of the formation of national consciousness, the strength of which determines the viability of the nation. The birth of the national history subject is one of its key problems, without whose solution the successful building of a modern Ukrainian nation is impossible. In addition to the three main versions of the origin of Ukrainians (Trypillia, early mediaeval, and late mediaeval), some Ukrainian researchers propose the so-called Kyivan Rus concept of Ukrainian genesis.The article presents a critical analysis of the Kyivan Rus concept of the birth of the Ukrainian nation. Vasyl Balushok, who has published two monographs touching the issue of the ethnogenesis of Ukrainians, is its most active supporter among modern domestic researchers. In them, the researcher examines in detail the main aspects of the Kyivan Rus version of the origin of Ukrainians. Therefore, the basis of the article is the analysis of two of his monographic studies, which provide a fairly complete picture of the current state of the problem of the Ukrainian ethnic group origin from Kyivan Rus.Balushok believes that the formation of the Ukrainian ethnos took place in Rus state and ended at the turn of the 12th and 13th centuries. The main shortcoming of V. Balushok's version of Ukrainaian genesis is the researcher's failure to recognise the first, tribal phase of the formation of Ruthenians-Ukrainians. It covers the entire early Middle Ages from the end of the 5th to the 10th centuries, when the Ukrainian ethnos consisted of related proto-Ukrainian tribes: Antes, Sklavens, Dulebs, Polans, Drevlians, Volhynians, Ulychis, Tivertsi, Croats. The latter consolidated into an aristocratic nation of Ruthenians-Ukrainians in the state of Rus during the 10th–13th centuries.The ethnogenesis of Ukrainians took place within the framework of the universal laws of the ethnohistorical development of the peoples of the middle part of Europe: Englishmen, Spaniards, Frenchmen, Romanians, Czechs, Poles, Serbs, Croats, Ruthenians-Ukrainians, etc. All of them went through three main phases of development: 1. The tribal period of the early Middle Ages (5th–9th centuries); 2. Aristocratic nations of the developed and late Middle Ages (10th–16th centuries); 3. Modern nations of the new and modern times (17th–21st centuries). V. Balushok's non-recognition of the tribal phase of Ukrainian genesis contradicts the specified universal laws of the development of the great ethnic groups of Europe.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌克兰创世纪的基辅罗斯版本。支持和反对的论据
民族历史是民族意识形成的核心,民族意识的强弱决定着民族的生存能力。民族史学科的诞生是其核心问题之一,没有这个问题的解决,乌克兰现代民族的成功建设是不可能的。除了乌克兰人起源的三个主要版本(特里皮利亚,中世纪早期和中世纪晚期)之外,一些乌克兰研究人员提出了所谓的乌克兰起源的基辅罗斯概念。本文对基辅罗斯关于乌克兰民族诞生的概念进行了批判性分析。Vasyl Balushok出版了两本关于乌克兰人民族起源问题的专著,他是现代国内研究人员中最积极的支持者。在他们中,研究人员详细检查了基辅罗斯版本的乌克兰人起源的主要方面。因此,本文的基础是对他的两篇专题研究的分析,这两篇专题研究提供了一个相当完整的关于基辅罗斯乌克兰民族起源问题现状的图景。Balushok认为,乌克兰民族的形成发生在罗斯州,并在12世纪和13世纪之交结束。V. Balushok的乌克兰起源版本的主要缺点是研究人员未能认识到鲁塞尼亚人-乌克兰人形成的第一个部落阶段。它涵盖了从5世纪末到10世纪的整个中世纪早期,当时乌克兰民族由相关的原始乌克兰部落组成:Antes, Sklavens, Dulebs, Polans, drevlian, Volhynians, Ulychis, Tivertsi, Croats。后者在10 - 13世纪期间在罗斯州巩固为一个鲁塞尼亚-乌克兰人的贵族国家。乌克兰人的民族形成是在欧洲中部各民族的民族历史发展的普遍规律的框架内发生的:英国人、西班牙人、法国人、罗马尼亚人、捷克人、波兰人、塞尔维亚人、克罗地亚人、鲁塞尼亚人-乌克兰人等等。它们都经历了三个主要的发展阶段:1。中世纪早期的部落时期(5 - 9世纪);2. 发达和中世纪晚期(10 - 16世纪)的贵族国家;3所示。新时代和现代(17 - 21世纪)的现代国家。V. Balushok不承认乌克兰起源的部落阶段与欧洲各大民族发展的具体普遍规律相矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Multidimensionality of the Institutionalization of the Values of the Ukrainian Ethnic Group Stages of the Formation of the Ukrainian People as a Local Manifestation of the Universal Ethnogenetic Processes of Europe Formation and Preservation of the Identity of Ukrainian Culture as a Factor of State Formation The Latest Study of the Civilization Identity of Ukrainiannеss Methodological Aspects of the Study of Worldview and Existential Dimensions and Archaic Stages of the Spiritual Genesis of the Ukrainian Ethnos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1