{"title":"RETHINKING HOWARD M. FEDERSPIEL’S THESIS ON THE CONFLICT BETWEEN PERSATUAN ISLAM VS PERMOEFAKATAN ISLAM","authors":"P. I. Fauzan, A. K. Fata","doi":"10.30821/jcims.v5i1.8889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This article discusses the thesis written by Howard M. Federspiel on the conflict between Persatuan Islam (PERSIS) and Permoefakatan Islam. This present study employed the historical methods of heuristic, historical critic, interpretation, historiography to examine Federspiel’s thesis by pointing out the new facts related to the initial history of PERSIS and its relationship with Permoefakatan Islam. It reveals that Permoefakatan Islam was not part of PERSIS. It was an entirely separate organization established in 1924 to accommodate the aspirations of the old and young generations. It was not a reaction due to presence of A. Hassan in PERSIS. PERSIS’s reformist character had always been there since its establishment as an organization, and A. Hassan’s presence emphasized this character.Keywords: Federspiel, PERSIS, Permoefakatan Islam, A. Hassan","PeriodicalId":52954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Societies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30821/jcims.v5i1.8889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract: This article discusses the thesis written by Howard M. Federspiel on the conflict between Persatuan Islam (PERSIS) and Permoefakatan Islam. This present study employed the historical methods of heuristic, historical critic, interpretation, historiography to examine Federspiel’s thesis by pointing out the new facts related to the initial history of PERSIS and its relationship with Permoefakatan Islam. It reveals that Permoefakatan Islam was not part of PERSIS. It was an entirely separate organization established in 1924 to accommodate the aspirations of the old and young generations. It was not a reaction due to presence of A. Hassan in PERSIS. PERSIS’s reformist character had always been there since its establishment as an organization, and A. Hassan’s presence emphasized this character.Keywords: Federspiel, PERSIS, Permoefakatan Islam, A. Hassan
摘要:本文讨论了霍华德·m·费斯皮尔(Howard M. Federspiel)关于Persatuan Islam (PERSIS)与Permoefakatan Islam之间冲突的论文。本研究采用启发式、历史批判、解释、史学等历史方法，通过指出波斯的初始历史及其与伊斯兰教的关系的新事实，来检验费德斯皮尔的论点。它揭示了Permoefakatan伊斯兰教不是波斯的一部分。它是一个完全独立的组织，成立于1924年，以满足老一代和年轻一代的愿望。这并不是由于哈桑在波斯的出现而引起的反应。波斯的改革派特征从它作为一个组织成立以来就一直存在，而哈桑的出现更强调了这一特征。关键词:Federspiel，波斯，Permoefakatan Islam, A. Hassan
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
