THE USE OF PERSONAL RESPONSE SYSTEMS TO RENEGOTIATE THE DIDACTICAL CONTRACT IN TERTIARY MATHEMATICS EDUCATION

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Journal for New Generation Sciences Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.47588/jngs.2022.20.01.a4
K. Bothma, AF Harding, I. Louw
{"title":"THE USE OF PERSONAL RESPONSE SYSTEMS TO RENEGOTIATE THE DIDACTICAL CONTRACT IN TERTIARY MATHEMATICS EDUCATION","authors":"K. Bothma, AF Harding, I. Louw","doi":"10.47588/jngs.2022.20.01.a4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Challenges experienced by first-year students transitioning from secondary to tertiary mathematics education are examined through the lens of the didactical contract. The didactical contract describes the expectations of both lecturer and students about their mutual obligations towards teaching and learning. First-year students’ beliefs about the nature of mathematics and mathematics teaching/learning need to be challenged to renegotiate the didactical contract at tertiary level. The study focuses on how to elicit and confront transitioning students’ beliefs in order to support their learning and influence a shift in the didactical contract. A Likert scale questionnaire was deployed at the beginning of students’ first year to gauge their beliefs about mathematics and mathematics teaching/learning and redeployed near the end of the first semester (or term) to observe possible changes in their beliefs and hence the didactical contract. The intervention consisted of personal response system (PRS) sessions regularly incorporated into the traditional transmission mode lecture to flip the classroom and create a student-centred learning environment, aimed at influencing students’ beliefs in order to make them aware of their own learning and their responsibility for learning. Questionnaire data were quantified and compared for the before and after surveys. There is evidence of a shift towards students taking ownership of their learning and a renegotiation of the didactical contract. Qualitative data generated by focus group interviews confirm the role of the PRS sessions in influencing student beliefs and the didactical contract.","PeriodicalId":42075,"journal":{"name":"Journal for New Generation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for New Generation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47588/jngs.2022.20.01.a4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Challenges experienced by first-year students transitioning from secondary to tertiary mathematics education are examined through the lens of the didactical contract. The didactical contract describes the expectations of both lecturer and students about their mutual obligations towards teaching and learning. First-year students’ beliefs about the nature of mathematics and mathematics teaching/learning need to be challenged to renegotiate the didactical contract at tertiary level. The study focuses on how to elicit and confront transitioning students’ beliefs in order to support their learning and influence a shift in the didactical contract. A Likert scale questionnaire was deployed at the beginning of students’ first year to gauge their beliefs about mathematics and mathematics teaching/learning and redeployed near the end of the first semester (or term) to observe possible changes in their beliefs and hence the didactical contract. The intervention consisted of personal response system (PRS) sessions regularly incorporated into the traditional transmission mode lecture to flip the classroom and create a student-centred learning environment, aimed at influencing students’ beliefs in order to make them aware of their own learning and their responsibility for learning. Questionnaire data were quantified and compared for the before and after surveys. There is evidence of a shift towards students taking ownership of their learning and a renegotiation of the didactical contract. Qualitative data generated by focus group interviews confirm the role of the PRS sessions in influencing student beliefs and the didactical contract.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用个人反应系统重新协商高等数学教学契约
一年级学生从中学到高等数学教育的过渡所经历的挑战是通过教学合同的镜头进行检查。教学契约描述了教师和学生对他们对教学和学习的相互义务的期望。一年级学生对数学本质和数学教学/学习的信念需要被挑战,以重新协商高等教育水平的教学合同。本研究的重点是如何引出和面对转型期学生的信念,以支持他们的学习和影响教学契约的转变。在学生第一年开始时使用李克特量表来评估他们对数学和数学教/学的信念,并在第一学期(或学期)结束时重新使用问卷来观察他们的信念可能发生的变化,从而观察教学契约。干预包括个人反应系统(PRS)会话,定期纳入传统的传播模式讲座,以翻转课堂,创造以学生为中心的学习环境,旨在影响学生的信念,使他们意识到自己的学习和学习的责任。对调查前后的问卷数据进行量化比较。有证据表明,学生掌握了自己的学习主动权,并对教学合同进行了重新谈判。焦点小组访谈产生的定性数据证实了PRS课程在影响学生信念和教学契约方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for New Generation Sciences
Journal for New Generation Sciences SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence Of Different Data Sources And Methods On The Estimation Of Areal Reduction Factors: Case Study In The Western Cape Province, South Africa A Critical View On Doctoral Supervisor Capacity Development At A South African University Of Technology “Help, I Need Somebody, Help…”: Supporting Doctoral Candidates In Different Fields Of Research Assisting Postgraduate Students To Synthesise Qualitative Propositions To Develop A Conceptual Framework The Possibilities Of Personalised Pathways And Portfolios For Enhancing PhD Programmes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1