Comparison of the Effect of Lidocaine in Combination to Meloxicam and/or Metamizole Sodium Epidurally on Analgesic Parameters, and Health Status of Holstein Cattle

Khosro Safari, A. Raisi, A. Zakian, A. Mohamadnia
{"title":"Comparison of the Effect of Lidocaine in Combination to Meloxicam and/or Metamizole Sodium Epidurally on Analgesic Parameters, and Health Status of Holstein Cattle","authors":"Khosro Safari, A. Raisi, A. Zakian, A. Mohamadnia","doi":"10.30500/IVSA.2020.244439.1222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective- This practice performed to compare the quality of analgesia, hematological parameters, and prevalence of cardiac dysrhythmias following epidural administration of lidocaine, lidocaine-meloxicam, and lidocaine-Metamizole sodium in cows. Animals- Fifteen adult Holstein cows aged between 3-5 years were assigned into three equal groups. Design- Each cow received the lidocaine (0.22 mg/kg), lidocaine-meloxicam (0.11 mg/kg – 0.25 mg/kg) or lidocaine-Metamizole sodium (0.11 mg/kg -4 mg/kg) randomly via epidural injection into first intercoccygeal space. Procedure- Analgesia onset and duration were recorded. Heart rate, respiratory rate, rectal temperature, and ruminal motility were also recorded at 0, 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 minutes, Electrocardiograms at 0, 60 and 120 minutes and blood samples were collected through the caudal vein at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. Detection of arrhythmias was done by checking 60 seconds of each electrocardiogram.Results- analgesia onset in lidocaine-metamizole treatment was significantly longer than that of the other groups (p 0.05). Also, the duration of analgesia was significantly longer in lidocaine treatment compared to other experimental groups (p 0.05). Hematological parameters changes were not significantly different and all of the detected cardiac arrhythmias were physiologic among treatments (p > 0.05). \nConclusions and Clinical Relevance- Aforementioned dosages could be used in cows without any clinical, cardiac, and hematological side effects. Lidocaine analgesia was reliable; however, the authors were not sure about adequate analgesia resulted after injection the half-dose of meloxicam and Metamizole in combination with lidocaine therefore, further studies should be done.","PeriodicalId":14554,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Veterinary Surgery","volume":"15 1","pages":"123-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30500/IVSA.2020.244439.1222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective- This practice performed to compare the quality of analgesia, hematological parameters, and prevalence of cardiac dysrhythmias following epidural administration of lidocaine, lidocaine-meloxicam, and lidocaine-Metamizole sodium in cows. Animals- Fifteen adult Holstein cows aged between 3-5 years were assigned into three equal groups. Design- Each cow received the lidocaine (0.22 mg/kg), lidocaine-meloxicam (0.11 mg/kg – 0.25 mg/kg) or lidocaine-Metamizole sodium (0.11 mg/kg -4 mg/kg) randomly via epidural injection into first intercoccygeal space. Procedure- Analgesia onset and duration were recorded. Heart rate, respiratory rate, rectal temperature, and ruminal motility were also recorded at 0, 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 minutes, Electrocardiograms at 0, 60 and 120 minutes and blood samples were collected through the caudal vein at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. Detection of arrhythmias was done by checking 60 seconds of each electrocardiogram.Results- analgesia onset in lidocaine-metamizole treatment was significantly longer than that of the other groups (p 0.05). Also, the duration of analgesia was significantly longer in lidocaine treatment compared to other experimental groups (p 0.05). Hematological parameters changes were not significantly different and all of the detected cardiac arrhythmias were physiologic among treatments (p > 0.05). Conclusions and Clinical Relevance- Aforementioned dosages could be used in cows without any clinical, cardiac, and hematological side effects. Lidocaine analgesia was reliable; however, the authors were not sure about adequate analgesia resulted after injection the half-dose of meloxicam and Metamizole in combination with lidocaine therefore, further studies should be done.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利多卡因与美洛昔康和/或甲咪唑钠硬膜外联合应用对荷斯坦牛镇痛参数和健康状况的影响
目的:比较奶牛硬膜外给药利多卡因、利多卡因-美洛昔康和利多卡因-甲硝唑钠后的镇痛质量、血液学参数和心律失常发生率。动物:15头3-5岁的成年荷斯坦奶牛被分成三组。设计:每头奶牛随机接受利多卡因(0.22 mg/kg)、利多卡因-美洛昔康(0.11 mg/kg ~ 0.25 mg/kg)或利多卡因-美罗昔康钠(0.11 mg/kg ~ 4mg /kg)硬膜外注射至第一尾骨间隙。程序-记录镇痛的开始和持续时间。记录0、5、15、30、45、60、90和120分钟时的心率、呼吸频率、直肠温度和瘤胃运动,0、60和120分钟时的心电图,0、30、60、90和120分钟时的尾静脉采血。检测心律失常是通过检查每60秒的心电图来完成的。结果:利多卡因-安咪唑组镇痛时间明显长于其他组(p < 0.05)。利多卡因组镇痛时间明显长于其他实验组(p < 0.05)。两组血液学指标变化无显著性差异,心律失常均为生理性(p < 0.05)。结论和临床意义-上述剂量可用于奶牛,无任何临床、心脏和血液副作用。利多卡因镇痛可靠;然而,作者不确定半剂量美洛昔康、Metamizole联合利多卡因注射后是否有足够的镇痛效果,因此,需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of intraperitoneal administration of polyethylene glycol solution on ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat testicular torsion and detorsion model Effect of Cinnamon Nanoparticles in Presence of HAMLET on the Healing of Wounds Infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa: An Animal Model Study Evaluation of Clinical Signs, Hematological and Biochemical Parameters after Blood Transfusion from Sheep to Goat Coronal Rhytidectomy for Correction of Bilateral Superior Entropion in Dogs with Redundant Eyebrow Droop - A Review of Two Cases Ultrasonographic and Cystographic Evaluations of Urinary Bladder Defects Managed with Composite Colo-Peritoneal Grafts in Dogs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1