May telephone surveys provide reliable public health surveillance data for municipalities? Mode effects differ between categories of questions. The HUNT Study, Norway

Q3 Medicine Norsk Epidemiologi Pub Date : 2019-05-09 DOI:10.5324/NJE.V28I1-2.3057
Mattias Tagseth, E. Sund, G. Hallman, J. Holmen, Kyrre Kvistad, J. Vik, S. Krokstad
{"title":"May telephone surveys provide reliable public health surveillance data for municipalities? Mode effects differ between categories of questions. The HUNT Study, Norway","authors":"Mattias Tagseth, E. Sund, G. Hallman, J. Holmen, Kyrre Kvistad, J. Vik, S. Krokstad","doi":"10.5324/NJE.V28I1-2.3057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Availability of data on health and its determinants at the local area level is a prerequisite for developing interventions and public health campaigns locally. Collecting self-reported data by means of telephone interviews may rapidly provide relevant data. The reliability of such data may be questioned. In this study, we sought to compare exact similar questions addressed by a recent telephone survey with a previous large scale and very comprehensive population health survey (The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006-08 – HUNT3), conducted a few years earlier in the same geographical region. This was done in order to examine the reliability of telephone interviews as a method to provide data on health and determinants to enable municipal authorities to get a sufficient overview.Methods: One rural and one urban municipality covered by HUNT3 using paper questionnaires were resurveyed through computer assisted telephone interviews. The weighted results for 34 dichotomized variables were compared using chi square tests.Results: The comparison of results between the rural and the urban samples and HUNT3 involved 68 chi square tests, 25 of which (38%) displayed significant differences. The ability of the telephone survey to replicate the results from HUNT3 was only moderate, but with differences between survey themes. Comparability was poor for adverse life events and mental health factors, fair for behavioural and risk factors, and skewed for general health and life satisfaction. The replication was good for reports on the less sensitive and subjective theme of cultural participation.Conclusion: The comparability of the data differed between themes. The differences may be ascribed to mode effects and to some extent the time lag between the surveys. Because replicability on issues that may be more embarrassing or stressful to recall appears to be poorer, and the more subjective self-assessments of health and well-being appear skewed, it is reasonable to conclude that there is an interviewer effect in the telephone survey. The use of a questionnaire through mail or web to monitor public health in municipalities should be considered as an alternative.","PeriodicalId":35548,"journal":{"name":"Norsk Epidemiologi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norsk Epidemiologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5324/NJE.V28I1-2.3057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Availability of data on health and its determinants at the local area level is a prerequisite for developing interventions and public health campaigns locally. Collecting self-reported data by means of telephone interviews may rapidly provide relevant data. The reliability of such data may be questioned. In this study, we sought to compare exact similar questions addressed by a recent telephone survey with a previous large scale and very comprehensive population health survey (The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006-08 – HUNT3), conducted a few years earlier in the same geographical region. This was done in order to examine the reliability of telephone interviews as a method to provide data on health and determinants to enable municipal authorities to get a sufficient overview.Methods: One rural and one urban municipality covered by HUNT3 using paper questionnaires were resurveyed through computer assisted telephone interviews. The weighted results for 34 dichotomized variables were compared using chi square tests.Results: The comparison of results between the rural and the urban samples and HUNT3 involved 68 chi square tests, 25 of which (38%) displayed significant differences. The ability of the telephone survey to replicate the results from HUNT3 was only moderate, but with differences between survey themes. Comparability was poor for adverse life events and mental health factors, fair for behavioural and risk factors, and skewed for general health and life satisfaction. The replication was good for reports on the less sensitive and subjective theme of cultural participation.Conclusion: The comparability of the data differed between themes. The differences may be ascribed to mode effects and to some extent the time lag between the surveys. Because replicability on issues that may be more embarrassing or stressful to recall appears to be poorer, and the more subjective self-assessments of health and well-being appear skewed, it is reasonable to conclude that there is an interviewer effect in the telephone survey. The use of a questionnaire through mail or web to monitor public health in municipalities should be considered as an alternative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电话调查能否为市政当局提供可靠的公共卫生监测数据?模态效应因问题类别而异。HUNT研究,挪威
背景:在地方一级获得关于健康及其决定因素的数据是在当地制定干预措施和开展公共卫生运动的先决条件。通过电话采访的方式收集自我报告的数据可以迅速提供相关数据。这些数据的可靠性可能会受到质疑。在这项研究中,我们试图将最近的一项电话调查与几年前在同一地理区域进行的一项大规模、非常全面的人口健康调查(The Nord Trøndelag health study 2006-08–HUNT3)所解决的完全相似的问题进行比较。这样做是为了检查电话采访作为一种提供健康和决定因素数据的方法的可靠性,使市政当局能够获得充分的概述。方法:采用计算机辅助电话访谈的方法,对HUNT3覆盖的一个农村和一个城市进行问卷调查。34个二分变量的加权结果使用卡方检验进行比较。结果:农村和城市样本与HUNT3的结果比较涉及68个卡方检验,其中25个(38%)显示出显著差异。电话调查复制HUNT3结果的能力中等,但调查主题之间存在差异。不良生活事件和心理健康因素的可比性较差,行为和风险因素的可比较性尚可,总体健康和生活满意度的可比较度存在偏差。这种复制有利于关于文化参与这一不那么敏感和主观的主题的报告。结论:不同主题的数据可比性不同。这种差异可能归因于模式效应,在某种程度上也可能归因于调查之间的时间滞后。因为在回忆起来可能更尴尬或压力更大的问题上,可复制性似乎更差,而且对健康和幸福感的主观自我评估似乎也有偏差,因此可以合理地得出结论,电话调查中存在采访者效应。应考虑通过邮件或网络使用调查表来监测市政当局的公共卫生情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Norsk Epidemiologi
Norsk Epidemiologi Medicine-Epidemiology
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The impact of longitudinal surveillance of individuals with CP in Norway; a 20-year quality registry and follow-up program perspective Nasjonalt register for gastrokirurgi (NORGAST): noen tanker etter ti år External validation of SAPS II score reported to the Norwegian Intensive Care and Pandemic Registry (NIPaR) MS-registeret: meget viktig for MS-pasientene og enda viktigere fremover Et lederperspektiv – nytten av medisinske kvalitetsregistre og hvordan vi bruker disse i forbedringsarbeid og praksisendring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1