Preliminary Back-Analysis of the Height of Mud Brick Fortifications Based on Geoarchaeological Data at Tell El-Retaba Site in Egypt

IF 0.6 Q4 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Studia Quaternaria Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI:10.1515/squa-2017-0008
J. Trzciński, M. Zaremba, S. Rzepka, W. Bogusz, T. Godlewski, Tom Szczepanski
{"title":"Preliminary Back-Analysis of the Height of Mud Brick Fortifications Based on Geoarchaeological Data at Tell El-Retaba Site in Egypt","authors":"J. Trzciński, M. Zaremba, S. Rzepka, W. Bogusz, T. Godlewski, Tom Szczepanski","doi":"10.1515/squa-2017-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Tell el-Retaba archaeological site is located at Wadi Tumilat, a shallow valley running from the Nile Delta to the Bitter Lakes. In ancient times, a route connecting Egypt with Syria-Palestine ran across the site. In the 13th century BC, during the rule of Ramesses II, a fortress surrounded by “Wall 1” was erected and in times of Ramesses III in the 12th century BC, a larger fortress surrounded by “Wall 2” and “Wall 3” was constructed. Using the finite element method (FEM) and ZSoil 2D&3D software, the wall heights were modelled and their soil-structure interaction was analysed. Strength of the wall depended on size and strength of bricks and mortar, brickwork, wall shape and foundation. Ancient builders using mud bricks must have known from practical experience the essentials of a wall construction, in which the height to width ratio was at 1.75 to 1.85. Moreover, they must have related the engineering properties of the material with the height of the construction and its purpose. The width to height ratio must have been used and related by ancient Egyptians to the ground resistance. Modelling has shown that, at wall width of 5 m, the foundation would have lost its stability at wall height of 13–14 m and bricks from the lower part of the wall would be destroyed. According to the undertaken assumptions, in order to retain stability, the wall height must have been limited to about 8–9 m.","PeriodicalId":42625,"journal":{"name":"Studia Quaternaria","volume":"34 1","pages":"108 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Quaternaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/squa-2017-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract The Tell el-Retaba archaeological site is located at Wadi Tumilat, a shallow valley running from the Nile Delta to the Bitter Lakes. In ancient times, a route connecting Egypt with Syria-Palestine ran across the site. In the 13th century BC, during the rule of Ramesses II, a fortress surrounded by “Wall 1” was erected and in times of Ramesses III in the 12th century BC, a larger fortress surrounded by “Wall 2” and “Wall 3” was constructed. Using the finite element method (FEM) and ZSoil 2D&3D software, the wall heights were modelled and their soil-structure interaction was analysed. Strength of the wall depended on size and strength of bricks and mortar, brickwork, wall shape and foundation. Ancient builders using mud bricks must have known from practical experience the essentials of a wall construction, in which the height to width ratio was at 1.75 to 1.85. Moreover, they must have related the engineering properties of the material with the height of the construction and its purpose. The width to height ratio must have been used and related by ancient Egyptians to the ground resistance. Modelling has shown that, at wall width of 5 m, the foundation would have lost its stability at wall height of 13–14 m and bricks from the lower part of the wall would be destroyed. According to the undertaken assumptions, in order to retain stability, the wall height must have been limited to about 8–9 m.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于埃及Tell El Retaba遗址考古资料的泥砖防御工事高度的初步反分析
摘要Tell el Retaba考古遗址位于Wadi Tumilat,这是一个从尼罗河三角洲到比特湖的浅河谷。在古代,一条连接埃及和叙利亚-巴勒斯坦的路线穿过该遗址。公元前13世纪,拉美西斯二世统治期间,修建了一座被“1号墙”包围的堡垒,公元前12世纪拉美西斯三世统治期间,建造了一座由“2号墙”和“3号墙”环绕的更大堡垒。采用有限元法(FEM)和ZSoil二维和三维软件对墙高进行了建模,并分析了墙高与土-结构的相互作用。墙的强度取决于砖和砂浆的尺寸和强度、砌砖、墙的形状和基础。使用泥砖的古代建筑商一定从实践经验中了解了墙壁建造的要点,其中高宽比为1.75比1.85。此外,他们必须将材料的工程特性与建筑高度及其用途联系起来。宽高比一定是古埃及人使用的,并且与地面阻力有关。建模表明,在墙宽为5米的情况下,基础在墙高为13-14米时会失去稳定性,墙下部的砖块会被破坏。根据假设,为了保持稳定性,墙壁高度必须限制在8-9米左右。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Quaternaria
Studia Quaternaria GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Studia Quaternaria is designed to publish scientific works concerning the Quaternary, on local, regional and global scale. Studia Quaternaria is interested in all fields of research dealing with stratigraphy and reconstruction of the past environments, including palaeogeography, palaeoecology, palaeoclimatology, palaeohydrology etc. The journal is also open to studies of natural environmental processes, and to recognition of mechanisms involved in the dynamics of our environment. The clue is that the Quaternary is still ongoing and vivid, and understanding of its past and present development support each other.
期刊最新文献
Informational support on creation of the geoportal "Environmental Safety of Ukrainian-Polish Transboundary Territories" by technologies of robotized monitoring Geoarchaeological evidence of late and post-Antiquity (5th-9th c. AD) climate changes recorded at the Roman site in Plemići Bay (Zadar region, Croatia) Environmental history of the Csorna Plain (Western Danube Plain, NW Hungary) from the Late Glacial to the Late Holocene as seen from data of multiproxy geoarchaeological investigations Quaternary valley levels and river terraces in the western part of the Holy Cross Mountains Late Glacial palaeoenvironmental changes in the southern part of the Holy Cross Mountains based on the “Białe Ługi” peatland record
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1