Ulysses Coercion Through Psychiatric Advanced Directives in Homeless People With Substance Use Disorder: A Qualitative Study of the Colombian Perspective

Juan P. Borda, Pablo Zuleta
{"title":"Ulysses Coercion Through Psychiatric Advanced Directives in Homeless People With Substance Use Disorder: A Qualitative Study of the Colombian Perspective","authors":"Juan P. Borda, Pablo Zuleta","doi":"10.1097/ADT.0000000000000204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Homeless substance users (HSUs) represent a public health challenge given their high social impact and the numerous barriers they have to overcome to receivemental health treatment. Recent public debate in Colombia is concerned with how to approach HSUs within the health system. The aim of this publication was to explore the possibility of implementing Psychiatric Advance Directives (PADs) in HSUs as an alternative to coercive treatment, to favor substance abuse treatment adherence and service retention in this population. For this purpose, the authors conducted 3 in-depth interviews of individuals who previously experienced homelessness and were voluntarily admitted to an inpatient substance abuse treatment ward at the moment of the interview. This research indicates that substance abuse in homeless individuals does not imply an impairment of their mental or legal capacity. Moreover, restraining HSUs during intense craving episodes within inpatient settings by implementation of PAD does not seem to be a viable option given the multiple risks and challenges it poses to mental health care providers. Finally, the use of any coercivemeasure towardHSUs, and this type of PADs in particular, could potentially be associated with violent episodes or human rights violations within mental health institutions.","PeriodicalId":44600,"journal":{"name":"Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADT.0000000000000204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Homeless substance users (HSUs) represent a public health challenge given their high social impact and the numerous barriers they have to overcome to receivemental health treatment. Recent public debate in Colombia is concerned with how to approach HSUs within the health system. The aim of this publication was to explore the possibility of implementing Psychiatric Advance Directives (PADs) in HSUs as an alternative to coercive treatment, to favor substance abuse treatment adherence and service retention in this population. For this purpose, the authors conducted 3 in-depth interviews of individuals who previously experienced homelessness and were voluntarily admitted to an inpatient substance abuse treatment ward at the moment of the interview. This research indicates that substance abuse in homeless individuals does not imply an impairment of their mental or legal capacity. Moreover, restraining HSUs during intense craving episodes within inpatient settings by implementation of PAD does not seem to be a viable option given the multiple risks and challenges it poses to mental health care providers. Finally, the use of any coercivemeasure towardHSUs, and this type of PADs in particular, could potentially be associated with violent episodes or human rights violations within mental health institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过精神病高级指示对物质使用障碍无家可归者进行尤利西斯强制治疗:哥伦比亚视角的定性研究
无家可归的药物使用者(HSUs)是一项公共卫生挑战,因为他们的社会影响很大,而且他们在接受保健治疗时必须克服许多障碍。哥伦比亚最近的公开辩论是关于如何在卫生系统内处理HSUs问题。本出版物的目的是探讨在HSUs中实施精神病学预先指示(PADs)作为强制治疗的替代方案的可能性,以支持该人群的药物滥用治疗依从性和服务保留。为此,作者对之前经历过无家可归的人进行了3次深入访谈,并在访谈时自愿进入药物滥用住院治疗病房。这项研究表明,无家可归者滥用药物并不意味着他们的精神或法律能力受损。此外,考虑到对精神卫生保健提供者构成的多重风险和挑战,在住院环境中通过实施PAD来抑制强烈渴望发作中的HSUs似乎不是一个可行的选择。最后,对卫生保健人员,特别是这类临时护理人员采取任何胁迫措施,都可能与精神卫生机构内的暴力事件或侵犯人权行为有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment is a quarterly international journal devoted to practical clinical research and treatment issues related to the misuses of alcohol and licit and illicit drugs and the study and treatment of addictive disorders and their behaviors. The journal publishes broad-spectrum, patient-oriented coverage of all aspects of addiction, directed toward an audience of psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, psychopharmacologists, and primary care practitioners. Original articles help clinicians make more educated, effective decisions regarding optimal patient management and care. In-depth reviews examine current understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of addiction disorders.
期刊最新文献
Gender Differences in Methamphetamine Use Initiation and Trajectory of Use Among People Who Use Methamphetamine in a Mexico-U.S. Border City. Determining the Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Depression and Anxiety in Methadone Consumers: A Randomized Controlled: Erratum The Development of a Measuring Instrument for Substance Abuse Media Literacy Scale in Students Updating the Public Health and Mental Health Education Curriculum About Addictions During the COVID-19 Outbreak Effectiveness of Positive Psychology Skills Training on Life Expectancy of Addicts in Tehran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1