European Framework Agreements in Multinational Companies. What Role for European Labour Law?

IF 0.8 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.54648/ijcl2023017
L. Pisarczyk, A. Boguska
{"title":"European Framework Agreements in Multinational Companies. What Role for European Labour Law?","authors":"L. Pisarczyk, A. Boguska","doi":"10.54648/ijcl2023017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on European Framework Agreements (EFAs) concluded between multinational companies and employee representatives (trade unions, European Works Councils (EWCs)). EFAs have been seen as a chance to revive industrial relations, in particular in countries (e.g., Eastern European countries) where traditional collective bargaining is in a critical condition. The main problem concerning EFAs is, however, the lack of an appropriate legal framework suitable for the transnational nature of the agreements. Although the development of EFAs depends on various factors, including the engagement of the social partners, the lack of any legal framework may be perceived as an obstacle to conducting transnational negotiations and concluding EFAs. Undoubtedly, the most important role in creating a legal framework for transnational agreements should be played by EU law. In the authors’ opinion, the EU has the legal instruments to create a legal framework for EFAs. The best way to create a legal framework for EFAs seems to be in the form of a directive pursuant to Article 153(1)(b) and (f) in conjunction with Article 153(2)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). It is important to adopt solutions that would facilitate negotiations, with a view to ensuring their effectiveness, while providing support mechanisms for monitoring and resolving potential conflicts. However, adopting a framework for EFAs may turn out to be difficult due to the lack of political will. Perhaps the changing reality will induce the stakeholders to resume work on the regulation – the more so as EFAs fit into the European Pillar of Social Rights.\nEuropean Framework Agreements, Collective Bargaining, Multinational, Companies, Trade Unions, European Works Councils","PeriodicalId":44213,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ijcl2023017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on European Framework Agreements (EFAs) concluded between multinational companies and employee representatives (trade unions, European Works Councils (EWCs)). EFAs have been seen as a chance to revive industrial relations, in particular in countries (e.g., Eastern European countries) where traditional collective bargaining is in a critical condition. The main problem concerning EFAs is, however, the lack of an appropriate legal framework suitable for the transnational nature of the agreements. Although the development of EFAs depends on various factors, including the engagement of the social partners, the lack of any legal framework may be perceived as an obstacle to conducting transnational negotiations and concluding EFAs. Undoubtedly, the most important role in creating a legal framework for transnational agreements should be played by EU law. In the authors’ opinion, the EU has the legal instruments to create a legal framework for EFAs. The best way to create a legal framework for EFAs seems to be in the form of a directive pursuant to Article 153(1)(b) and (f) in conjunction with Article 153(2)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). It is important to adopt solutions that would facilitate negotiations, with a view to ensuring their effectiveness, while providing support mechanisms for monitoring and resolving potential conflicts. However, adopting a framework for EFAs may turn out to be difficult due to the lack of political will. Perhaps the changing reality will induce the stakeholders to resume work on the regulation – the more so as EFAs fit into the European Pillar of Social Rights. European Framework Agreements, Collective Bargaining, Multinational, Companies, Trade Unions, European Works Councils
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨国公司的欧洲框架协议。欧洲劳动法的作用是什么?
这篇文章的重点是欧洲框架协议(EFAs)跨国公司和员工代表(工会,欧洲工作委员会(EWCs))之间的结论。全民教育被视为恢复劳资关系的一个机会,特别是在传统集体谈判处于危急状态的国家(例如东欧国家)。然而,关于普及教育协定的主要问题是缺乏适合协定的跨国性质的适当法律框架。虽然全民教育协定的发展取决于各种因素,包括社会伙伴的参与,但缺乏任何法律框架可能被视为进行跨国谈判和缔结全民教育协定的障碍。毫无疑问,在为跨国协议创建法律框架方面,欧盟法律应发挥最重要的作用。在作者看来,欧盟拥有法律工具来为EFAs创建法律框架。为EFAs创建法律框架的最佳方式似乎是根据欧盟运作条约(TFEU)第153(1)(b)和(f)条以及第153(2)(b)条制定指令。重要的是采取有助于谈判的解决办法,以期确保谈判的有效性,同时提供监测和解决潜在冲突的支助机制。然而,由于缺乏政治意愿,采用全民教育框架可能会很困难。也许不断变化的现实将促使利益相关者重新开始监管工作——尤其是在全民教育符合欧洲社会权利支柱的情况下。欧洲框架协议,集体谈判,跨国公司,公司,工会,欧洲工作委员会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Published four times a year, the International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations is an essential source of information and analysis for labour lawyers, academics, judges, policymakers and others. The Journal publishes original articles in the domains of labour law (broadly understood) and industrial relations. Articles cover comparative and international (or regional) analysis of topical issues, major developments and innovative practices, as well as discussions of theoretical and methodological approaches. The Journal adopts a double-blind peer review process. A distinguished editorial team, with the support of an International Advisory Board of eminent scholars from around the world, ensures a continuing high standard of scientific research dealing with a range of important issues.
期刊最新文献
Litigating the Algorithmic Boss in the EU: A (Legally) Feasible and (Strategically) Attractive Option for Trade Unions? Modern Slavery in Liner Shipping: An Empirical Analysis of Corporate Statements The Requirement of Fair Negotiation (Gebot des fairen Verhandelns) and the Principle of Undue Influence in German and US Employment Law Regulating Platform Work in the UK and Italy: Politics, Law and Political Economy Regulating Algorithmic Management at Work in the European Union: Data Protection, Non-discrimination and Collective Rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1