Healthcare professional’s knowledge and awareness of the medication error reporting systems in the Kuwaiti hospitals

IF 0.4 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.2478/cipms-2023-0015
Mohammad Saada
{"title":"Healthcare professional’s knowledge and awareness of the medication error reporting systems in the Kuwaiti hospitals","authors":"Mohammad Saada","doi":"10.2478/cipms-2023-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective. A survey was conducted to explore healthcare professional’s (HCPs) knowledge and attitude towards medication errors reporting processes and systems used in their local hospitals. Methods. There were 696 respondents and the observational survey showed the diverse perspectives of HCPs from diverse professions (doctors, pharmacists and nurses) who are at different stages in their career. The survey results highlighted the deficiencies in the medication safety management process, including the follow-up on witnessed or discovered medication errors, the effectiveness of the used reporting systems for medication errors, the standardisation of electronic prescribing software, and the training of HCPs at the six hospitals on medication safety. Key finding. Only 46% of the surveyed stated that their hospital had a mechanism in place for reporting medication errors and 60.7% of the participants agreed that they would submit reports provided the system is not used for performance management and only those need to know will be able to identify their name. Regarding prescription writing, 51% of surveyed HCPs said they utilise electronic prescribing software; however, the overall usage rate of electronic prescribing systems was 49%, with handwritten prescriptions remaining the option used in the majority of the time. In terms of HCP training, 20% of the survey respondents said they did not receive any instruction or direction in the hospitals on pharmacovigilance and patient safety. Conclusions. The Kuwaiti MoH should build a national electronic incident reporting system and establish standardised rules and protocols for incident reporting that is to be anonymous and of compulsory use by all government and private hospitals.","PeriodicalId":11071,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences","volume":"36 1","pages":"87 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cipms-2023-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective. A survey was conducted to explore healthcare professional’s (HCPs) knowledge and attitude towards medication errors reporting processes and systems used in their local hospitals. Methods. There were 696 respondents and the observational survey showed the diverse perspectives of HCPs from diverse professions (doctors, pharmacists and nurses) who are at different stages in their career. The survey results highlighted the deficiencies in the medication safety management process, including the follow-up on witnessed or discovered medication errors, the effectiveness of the used reporting systems for medication errors, the standardisation of electronic prescribing software, and the training of HCPs at the six hospitals on medication safety. Key finding. Only 46% of the surveyed stated that their hospital had a mechanism in place for reporting medication errors and 60.7% of the participants agreed that they would submit reports provided the system is not used for performance management and only those need to know will be able to identify their name. Regarding prescription writing, 51% of surveyed HCPs said they utilise electronic prescribing software; however, the overall usage rate of electronic prescribing systems was 49%, with handwritten prescriptions remaining the option used in the majority of the time. In terms of HCP training, 20% of the survey respondents said they did not receive any instruction or direction in the hospitals on pharmacovigilance and patient safety. Conclusions. The Kuwaiti MoH should build a national electronic incident reporting system and establish standardised rules and protocols for incident reporting that is to be anonymous and of compulsory use by all government and private hospitals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健专业人员对科威特医院药物错误报告系统的了解和认识
摘要目标。进行了一项调查,以探讨医疗保健专业人员(HCP)对当地医院使用的药物错误报告流程和系统的知识和态度。方法。共有696名受访者,观察性调查显示了来自不同职业(医生、药剂师和护士)的HCP的不同观点,他们正处于职业生涯的不同阶段。调查结果强调了药物安全管理过程中的不足,包括对目击或发现的药物错误的跟踪、使用的药物错误报告系统的有效性、电子处方软件的标准化,以及六家医院HCP的药物安全培训。关键发现。只有46%的受访者表示,他们的医院有报告药物错误的机制,60.7%的参与者同意,如果该系统不用于绩效管理,他们将提交报告,只有那些需要知道的人才能识别自己的姓名。关于处方书写,51%的受访HCP表示他们使用电子处方软件;然而,电子处方系统的总体使用率为49%,手写处方在大多数情况下仍然是使用的选项。在HCP培训方面,20%的受访者表示,他们在医院没有收到任何关于药物警戒和患者安全的指导或指示。结论。科威特卫生部应建立一个国家电子事故报告系统,并为事故报告制定标准化规则和协议,这些规则和协议应是匿名的,所有政府和私立医院都必须使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences
Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Potential predictive biomarker for diabetic peripheral neuropathy: serum neuron-specific enolase Evaluation of parenteral injection skills of medical undergraduates on mannequins in a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India – A cross-sectional study Hepatoprotective effect of Indonesian propolis from Apis mellifera in carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) induced liver injury in mice Fosfomycin activity in vitro against Escherichia coli strains isolated from urine specimens Humoral response after breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1