Administering prophylactic alpha-blockade to reduce urinary retention post inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Surgery in practice and science Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100204
Gavin G. Calpin , Alice M. O'Neill , Matthew G. Davey , Peggy Miller , William P. Joyce
{"title":"Administering prophylactic alpha-blockade to reduce urinary retention post inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials","authors":"Gavin G. Calpin ,&nbsp;Alice M. O'Neill ,&nbsp;Matthew G. Davey ,&nbsp;Peggy Miller ,&nbsp;William P. Joyce","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The incidence of post-operative urinary retention (POUR) following inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is approximately 0.4% - 22.0%. POUR may lead to patient discomfort and catheter-related complications including urinary tract infection, urethral trauma, bladder overdistension and subsequent permanent bladder dysfunction. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials (RCT) evaluating the impact of administration of perioperative alpha-blockade to reduce the incidence of acute POUR following IHR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. The incidence of POUR in the alpha-blocker and control groups were expressed as dichotomous outcomes, reported as odds ratios (ORs) expressed with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) following estimation using the Mantel-Haenszel method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eight RCTs with a combined total of 918 patients were included. Of these, 53.7% (493/918) received alpha-blockers while 46.3% (425/918) did not. Five studies used tamsulosin, two used prazosin and one used phenoxybenzamine. Overall, the prescription of prophylactic alpha-blockers in the preoperative setting significantly reduced POUR compared to the control group (7.9% (39/493) vs 21.2% (90/425), OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12–0.80, <em>P</em> = 0.020).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Preoperative prescription of alpha-blockers reduced the incidence of POUR following inguinal hernia repair. The next generation of prospective randomised trials may identify which patients should be prescribed this medication prior to surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction

The incidence of post-operative urinary retention (POUR) following inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is approximately 0.4% - 22.0%. POUR may lead to patient discomfort and catheter-related complications including urinary tract infection, urethral trauma, bladder overdistension and subsequent permanent bladder dysfunction. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials (RCT) evaluating the impact of administration of perioperative alpha-blockade to reduce the incidence of acute POUR following IHR.

Methods

A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. The incidence of POUR in the alpha-blocker and control groups were expressed as dichotomous outcomes, reported as odds ratios (ORs) expressed with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) following estimation using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

Results

Eight RCTs with a combined total of 918 patients were included. Of these, 53.7% (493/918) received alpha-blockers while 46.3% (425/918) did not. Five studies used tamsulosin, two used prazosin and one used phenoxybenzamine. Overall, the prescription of prophylactic alpha-blockers in the preoperative setting significantly reduced POUR compared to the control group (7.9% (39/493) vs 21.2% (90/425), OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12–0.80, P = 0.020).

Conclusion

Preoperative prescription of alpha-blockers reduced the incidence of POUR following inguinal hernia repair. The next generation of prospective randomised trials may identify which patients should be prescribed this medication prior to surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用预防性α阻断剂减少腹股沟疝修补术后尿潴留:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
腹股沟疝修补术(IHR)术后尿潴留(POUR)的发生率约为0.4% ~ 22.0%。POUR可能导致患者不适和导尿管相关并发症,包括尿路感染、尿道创伤、膀胱过度膨胀和随后的永久性膀胱功能障碍。我们的目的是对随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估围手术期给予α -阻断剂对减少IHR后急性POUR发生率的影响。方法按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。α受体阻滞剂组和对照组的POUR发生率以二分类结果表示,在使用Mantel-Haenszel方法估计后,以95%置信区间(ci)表示的比值比(ORs)报告。结果纳入8项随机对照试验,共918例患者。其中,53.7%(493/918)接受了α -受体阻滞剂治疗,46.3%(425/918)未接受。五项研究使用坦索罗辛,两项使用哌唑嗪,一项使用苯氧苄胺。总体而言,与对照组相比,术前预防性α -受体阻滞剂处方显著降低了POUR (7.9% (39/493) vs 21.2% (90/425), OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12-0.80, P = 0.020)。结论术前处方α受体阻滞剂可降低腹股沟疝修补术后POUR的发生率。下一代前瞻性随机试验可能会确定哪些患者在手术前应该开这种药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
期刊最新文献
Costs of surgical futility in emergency laparotomy Respiratory dysfunction in whiplash associated disorders (WAD) with cervical plexus syndrome – A case report Surgical sharp debridement alongside maggot debridement therapy (MDT) for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs): A systematic review of case reports Is there an impact of surgeon's experience on in-hospital outcome in patients with operatively treated proximal humerus and humerus shaft fractures? Operating room times differ for surgical fixation of metacarpal fractures: An analysis of two principally different techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1