F. Teymouri, Armin Zareiyan (Corresponding author), A. Pishgooie, H. Bagheri
{"title":"Hospital Preparedness Assessment Instruments in Chemical Incidents: A systematic literature review","authors":"F. Teymouri, Armin Zareiyan (Corresponding author), A. Pishgooie, H. Bagheri","doi":"10.24083/apjhm.v17i3.1779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chemical incidents are among the most frequent technological disasters that have occurred frequently in recent years. Among the organizations operating in disaster response, hospitals, as the primary unit of care, play the greatest and most critical role. Hence, providing appropriate measures that lead to minimizing the effects of these events is raised as one of the health system's priorities, so this study was carried out with the aim of systematic review on hospital preparedness instruments in chemical incidents \nMethods: This systematic review was carried out according to the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines . In this aim, through December 2020, 6 electronic databases were searched in MEDLINE (PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, ProQuest, Embase, and Cochrane) for the following key words: hospital, preparedness, chemical incidents, instrument. \nResults: Out of 7794 articles that were screened, 13 articles meet the inclusion criteria for entering the process of final analysis. Most studies were cross-sectional, two were cohort, and three studies were conducted by a qualitative method. The result showed that none of the evaluated checklists and tools included all dimensions required for an appropriate hospital preparedness evaluation in chemical incidents.\nConclusion: Based on the results of this investigation, there is no comprehensive tool for assessing hospital preparedness in chemical incidents. The data of this survey can be employed as a guideline for policymakers and managers of medical centers for planning in dealing with chemical incidents.","PeriodicalId":42935,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v17i3.1779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Chemical incidents are among the most frequent technological disasters that have occurred frequently in recent years. Among the organizations operating in disaster response, hospitals, as the primary unit of care, play the greatest and most critical role. Hence, providing appropriate measures that lead to minimizing the effects of these events is raised as one of the health system's priorities, so this study was carried out with the aim of systematic review on hospital preparedness instruments in chemical incidents
Methods: This systematic review was carried out according to the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines . In this aim, through December 2020, 6 electronic databases were searched in MEDLINE (PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, ProQuest, Embase, and Cochrane) for the following key words: hospital, preparedness, chemical incidents, instrument.
Results: Out of 7794 articles that were screened, 13 articles meet the inclusion criteria for entering the process of final analysis. Most studies were cross-sectional, two were cohort, and three studies were conducted by a qualitative method. The result showed that none of the evaluated checklists and tools included all dimensions required for an appropriate hospital preparedness evaluation in chemical incidents.
Conclusion: Based on the results of this investigation, there is no comprehensive tool for assessing hospital preparedness in chemical incidents. The data of this survey can be employed as a guideline for policymakers and managers of medical centers for planning in dealing with chemical incidents.
背景:化学事故是近年来频繁发生的最常见的技术灾害之一。在从事救灾工作的组织中,医院作为初级护理单位,发挥着最大和最关键的作用。因此,提供适当的措施,将这些事件的影响降到最低,是卫生系统的优先事项之一,因此,本研究的目的是对医院在化学事故中的准备工具进行系统评价。为此,截至2020年12月,我们在MEDLINE检索了6个电子数据库(PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, ProQuest, Embase和Cochrane),检索了以下关键词:医院,准备,化学事件,仪器。结果:在筛选的7794篇文献中,有13篇符合进入终分析的纳入标准。大多数研究为横断面研究,2项为队列研究,3项研究采用定性方法。结果表明,所评估的清单和工具中没有一个包括适当的医院化学事故准备评估所需的所有方面。结论:基于本调查的结果,没有一个综合的工具来评估医院在化学事故中的准备。本调查的数据可以作为医疗中心的决策者和管理者规划处理化学事故的指导方针。