Leketi Makalela & Goodith White (eds.), Rethinking language use in digital Africa: Technology and communication in sub-Saharan Africa. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2021. Pp. 216. Pb. £30.

IF 2 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Language in Society Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1017/S004740452200077X
Dallel Sarnou
{"title":"Leketi Makalela & Goodith White (eds.), Rethinking language use in digital Africa: Technology and communication in sub-Saharan Africa. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2021. Pp. 216. Pb. £30.","authors":"Dallel Sarnou","doi":"10.1017/S004740452200077X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"number of details provided and the size of the region (i.e. national, regional, local). Yet, some meaningful results were still discovered and are summarized below. Nationally, the most prominent distinction observed was the division between the people in the north (e.g. Yankees, talk fast) and those in the south (e.g. country, slow), even if some other regions were also occasionally commented upon (e.g. Californians as ‘surfer dudes’). Then, the focus is set on the American South, a heavily labelled region, even by southerners themselves and repeatedly associated with negative stereotyping (e.g. hicks, hillbillies). However, to dissociate themselves from the stigmatized southern stereotypes often popularized by the media (rural, twang), while at the same time being able to maintain their southern identity, participants often resorted to the conceptualization ‘us vs. them’, designed to establish that ‘we are southern but not THAT type of southern’. An example of this can be seen in how Kentuckians from Louisville placed the negative southern stereotypes in the Appalachian region (e.g. redneck). Finally, it should be mentioned that the application of the status vs. solidarity dichotomy (i.e. ‘friendly but stupid’) was also highly extended, and southerners frequently labelled other southerners as good people but not ones with whom they strongly self-identified. Noteworthy, the authors have themselves experienced the application of this conceptualization in the Southern university setting in which professors were sometimes perceived as less qualified if they make use of expressions such as ‘y’all’, and students from Eastern Kentucky were known to be teased because of their accents. In sum, this book intends to elucidate the different perceptions that people have of other linguistic varieties to provide the knowledge which will then give users the power to make informed decisions when they encounter linguistic diversity in their everyday lives.","PeriodicalId":51442,"journal":{"name":"Language in Society","volume":"52 1","pages":"178 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language in Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740452200077X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

number of details provided and the size of the region (i.e. national, regional, local). Yet, some meaningful results were still discovered and are summarized below. Nationally, the most prominent distinction observed was the division between the people in the north (e.g. Yankees, talk fast) and those in the south (e.g. country, slow), even if some other regions were also occasionally commented upon (e.g. Californians as ‘surfer dudes’). Then, the focus is set on the American South, a heavily labelled region, even by southerners themselves and repeatedly associated with negative stereotyping (e.g. hicks, hillbillies). However, to dissociate themselves from the stigmatized southern stereotypes often popularized by the media (rural, twang), while at the same time being able to maintain their southern identity, participants often resorted to the conceptualization ‘us vs. them’, designed to establish that ‘we are southern but not THAT type of southern’. An example of this can be seen in how Kentuckians from Louisville placed the negative southern stereotypes in the Appalachian region (e.g. redneck). Finally, it should be mentioned that the application of the status vs. solidarity dichotomy (i.e. ‘friendly but stupid’) was also highly extended, and southerners frequently labelled other southerners as good people but not ones with whom they strongly self-identified. Noteworthy, the authors have themselves experienced the application of this conceptualization in the Southern university setting in which professors were sometimes perceived as less qualified if they make use of expressions such as ‘y’all’, and students from Eastern Kentucky were known to be teased because of their accents. In sum, this book intends to elucidate the different perceptions that people have of other linguistic varieties to provide the knowledge which will then give users the power to make informed decisions when they encounter linguistic diversity in their everyday lives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Leketi Makalela & Goodith White(编),重新思考数字非洲的语言使用:撒哈拉以南非洲的技术和通信。布里斯托尔:多语言事务,2021年。216页。Pb。£30。
提供的详细信息数量和区域的大小(即国家、区域、地方)。然而,仍然发现了一些有意义的结果,并总结如下。从全国范围来看,最显著的区别是北方人(比如美国佬,说话快)和南方人(比如乡下人,说话慢)之间的区别,尽管其他一些地区偶尔也会被评论(比如加州人被称为“冲浪小子”)。然后,重点放在美国南部,一个被贴上标签的地区,甚至南方人自己也贴上了标签,并一再与负面的刻板印象(如乡巴佬、乡巴佬)联系在一起。然而,为了将自己与媒体经常推广的南方刻板印象(农村,鼻音)分离开来,同时能够保持他们的南方身份,参与者经常诉诸于“我们vs.他们”的概念,旨在确立“我们是南方人,但不是那种南方人”。一个例子是,来自路易斯维尔的肯塔基人如何将负面的南方刻板印象放在阿巴拉契亚地区(例如乡巴佬)。最后,应该提到的是,地位与团结二分法的应用(即“友好但愚蠢”)也得到了高度扩展,南方人经常将其他南方人标记为好人,但不是他们强烈认同的人。值得注意的是,作者自己也经历过这种概念在南方大学环境中的应用,在那里,如果教授使用“y’all”这样的表达,有时会被认为是不合格的,而来自东肯塔基州的学生则因为他们的口音而被嘲笑。总而言之,本书旨在阐明人们对其他语言变体的不同看法,以提供知识,从而使用户在日常生活中遇到语言多样性时能够做出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Language in Society is an international journal of sociolinguistics concerned with language and discourse as aspects of social life. The journal publishes empirical articles of general theoretical, comparative or methodological interest to students and scholars in sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, and related fields. Language in Society aims to strengthen international scholarship and interdisciplinary conversation and cooperation among researchers interested in language and society by publishing work of high quality which speaks to a wide audience. In addition to original articles, the journal publishes reviews and notices of the latest important books in the field as well as occasional theme and discussion sections.
期刊最新文献
Constraints, suffering, and surfacing repertoires among Gambian migrants in Italy Doing being an average teenager: Deploying ordinariness as subversive disability performance in presentational media The liminal (vowel) space of womanhood: Fundamental frequency, formants, and the intersex body in Brazil The Use of Methylphenidate During Inpatient Rehabilitation After Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Population Characteristics and Prescribing Patterns. Settle for Biden: The scalar production of a normative presidential candidate on Instagram
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1