A Survey On The Different Implemented Captchas

S. Khawandi, Firas Abdallah, Anis Ismail
{"title":"A Survey On The Different Implemented Captchas","authors":"S. Khawandi, Firas Abdallah, Anis Ismail","doi":"10.5121/CSIT.2019.90101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CAPTCHA is almost a standard security technology, and has found widespread application in commercial websites. There are two types: labeling and image based CAPTCHAs. To date, almost all CAPTCHA designs are labeling based. Labeling based CAPTCHAs refer to those that make judgment based on whether the question “what is it?” has been correctly answered. Essentially in Artificial Intelligence (AI), this means judgment depends on whether the new label provided by the user side matches the label already known to the server. Labeling based CAPTCHA designs have some common weaknesses that can be taken advantage of attackers. First, the label set, i.e., the number of classes, is small and fixed. Due to deformation and noise in CAPTCHAs, the classes have to be further reduced to avoid confusion. Second, clean segmentation in current design, in particular character labeling based CAPTCHAs, is feasible. The state of the art of CAPTCHA design suggests that the robustness of character labeling schemes should rely on the difficulty of finding where the character is (segmentation), rather than which character it is (recognition). However, the shapes of alphabet letters and numbers have very limited geometry characteristics that can be used by humans to tell them yet are also easy to be indistinct. Image recognition CAPTCHAs faces many potential problems which have not been fully studied. It is difficult for a small site to acquire a large dictionary of images which an attacker does not have access to and without a means of automatically acquiring new labeled images, an image based challenge does not usually meet the definition of a CAPTCHA. They are either unusable or prone to attacks. In this paper, we present the different types of CAPTCHAs trying to defeat advanced computer programs or bots, discussing the limitations and drawbacks of each.","PeriodicalId":72673,"journal":{"name":"Computer science & information technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer science & information technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5121/CSIT.2019.90101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

CAPTCHA is almost a standard security technology, and has found widespread application in commercial websites. There are two types: labeling and image based CAPTCHAs. To date, almost all CAPTCHA designs are labeling based. Labeling based CAPTCHAs refer to those that make judgment based on whether the question “what is it?” has been correctly answered. Essentially in Artificial Intelligence (AI), this means judgment depends on whether the new label provided by the user side matches the label already known to the server. Labeling based CAPTCHA designs have some common weaknesses that can be taken advantage of attackers. First, the label set, i.e., the number of classes, is small and fixed. Due to deformation and noise in CAPTCHAs, the classes have to be further reduced to avoid confusion. Second, clean segmentation in current design, in particular character labeling based CAPTCHAs, is feasible. The state of the art of CAPTCHA design suggests that the robustness of character labeling schemes should rely on the difficulty of finding where the character is (segmentation), rather than which character it is (recognition). However, the shapes of alphabet letters and numbers have very limited geometry characteristics that can be used by humans to tell them yet are also easy to be indistinct. Image recognition CAPTCHAs faces many potential problems which have not been fully studied. It is difficult for a small site to acquire a large dictionary of images which an attacker does not have access to and without a means of automatically acquiring new labeled images, an image based challenge does not usually meet the definition of a CAPTCHA. They are either unusable or prone to attacks. In this paper, we present the different types of CAPTCHAs trying to defeat advanced computer programs or bots, discussing the limitations and drawbacks of each.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于不同实施Captchas的调查
CAPTCHA几乎是一种标准的安全技术,在商业网站上得到了广泛的应用。有两种类型:标签和基于图像的CAPTCHA。迄今为止,几乎所有CAPTCHA设计都是基于标签的。基于标签的验证码是指那些根据“它是什么?”问题是否得到正确回答来做出判断的验证码。从本质上讲,在人工智能(AI)中,这意味着判断取决于用户端提供的新标签是否与服务器已知的标签匹配。基于标签的CAPTCHA设计有一些常见的弱点,攻击者可以利用这些弱点。首先,标签集,即类的数量,是小而固定的。由于CAPTCHA中的变形和噪声,必须进一步减少类以避免混淆。其次,当前设计中的干净分割,特别是基于字符标记的CAPTCHA,是可行的。CAPTCHA设计的最新技术表明,字符标记方案的稳健性应该取决于找到字符在哪里(分割)的困难,而不是找到字符在哪个字符(识别)。然而,字母和数字的形状具有非常有限的几何特征,人类可以用来辨别它们,但也很容易模糊。图像识别CAPTCHA面临许多尚未得到充分研究的潜在问题。小型站点很难获取攻击者无法访问的大型图像字典,并且如果没有自动获取新标记图像的方法,基于图像的挑战通常不符合CAPTCHA的定义。它们要么无法使用,要么容易受到攻击。在本文中,我们介绍了试图击败高级计算机程序或机器人的不同类型的验证码,并讨论了每种验证码的局限性和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tensor-Based Multi-Modality Feature Selection and Regression for Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis. Tensor-Based Multi-Modality Feature Selection and Regression for Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis Lattice Based Group Key Exchange Protocol in the Standard Model The 5 Dimensions of Problem Solving using DINNA Diagram: Double Ishikawa and Naze Naze Analysis Appraisal Study of Similarity-Based and Embedding-Based Link Prediction Methods on Graphs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1