Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization in the treatment of cirrhotic portal hypertension: a report of 425 cases

Jiang Guo-qing, Bai Dousheng, Qian Jianjun, Jin Shengjie, Z. Chi, W. Qian, Zhou Baohuan, Wang Aoqing
{"title":"Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization in the treatment of cirrhotic portal hypertension: a report of 425 cases","authors":"Jiang Guo-qing, Bai Dousheng, Qian Jianjun, Jin Shengjie, Z. Chi, W. Qian, Zhou Baohuan, Wang Aoqing","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-9752.2019.12.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension. \n \n \nMethods \nThe retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 425 patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension who were admitted to Northern Jiangsu People′s Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University were collected. There were 289 males and 136 females, aged (53±11)years, with a range from 21 to 79 years. All the patients were allocated into 3 periods according to the operation time, including 100 patients of early period from February 2012 to March 2014, 156 patients of mature technology period from April 2014 to August 2016, and 169 patients of technology innovation period from september 2016 to December 2018. The patients of early period and mature technology period underwent laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization, and the patients of technology innovation period underwent vagus nerve-preserving laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations; (2) postoperative situations; (3) follow-up. Patients were followed up by outpatient examination to detect the upper digestive rebleeding, gastric retention, and diarrhea up to March 2019. Sequential therapy of endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) was slectively performed on patients based on results of gastroscopy. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD, and comparison between groups was analyzed using ANOVA, and paired comparison was analyzed using the t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M (range), and comparison between groups was anlyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, and paired comparison was analyzed using the rank sum test. Count data were described as absolute numbers or percentages, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test and Fisher exact probability. \n \n \nResults \n(1) Surgical situations: the operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, cases with intraoperative blood transfusion, cases with conversion to open surgery, and cases with emergency operation for bleeding were (187±46)minutes, 150 mL (range, 50-1 300 mL), 2, 2 , 1 for patients of early period, (164±22)minutes, 50 mL (range, 30-100 mL), 1, 1, 1 for patients of mature technology period, and (150±18)minutes, 50 mL (range, 10-300 mL), 0 , 0 , 0 for patients of technology innovation period, respectively. There were significant differences in the operation time and volume of intraoperative blood loss between the three groups (F=55.482, χ2=94.620, P 0.05). (2) Postoperative situations: 425 patients had oral aspirin enteric-coated tablets for prevention of thrombus, with no perioperative death. Duration of postoperative hospital stay, cases with portal vein thrombosis at postoperative 7 days, cases with pancreatic fistula, cases with pulmonary infection, and cases with abdominal infection were (11.0±2.9)days, 46, 2, 1, 0 for patients of early period, (9.9±1.7)days, 81, 3, 0, 0 for patients of mature technology period, and (8.8±1.3)days, 83, 2, 1, 1 for patients of technology innovation period, respectively. There was a significant difference in the duration of postoperative hospital stay between the three groups (F=39.836, P 0.05) and no significant difference in the cases with pancreatic fistula, cases with pulmonary infection, or cases with abdominal infection between the three groups (P>0.05). Patients with portal vein thrombosis at postoperative 7 days had oral aspirin enteric-coated tablets or warfarin for treatment. Patients with pancreatic fistula, pulmonary infection, and abdominal infection were cured and discharged after conservative treatment. (3) Follow-up: all the 425 patients were followed up for 1-72 months, with a median follow-up of 36 months. Of the 425 patients, 261 underwent postoperative sequential therapy of EVL, including 133 patients of mature technology period and 128 patients of technology innovation period. The incidence rate of upper digestive rebleeding was 3.83%(10/261) of the 261 patients undergoing postoperative sequential therapy of EVL and 17.68%(29/164) of 164 patients without postoperative sequential therapy of EVL, showing a significant difference between them (χ2=23.185, P<0.05). The incidence rates of gastric retention and diarrhea were 96.24%(128/133) and 61.65%(82/133) for 133 patients undergoing sequential therapy of EVL in mature technology period, and 1.56%(2/128) and 3.91%(5/128) for 128 patients undergoing sequential therapy of EVL in technology innovation period, showing significant differences between them (χ2=233.876, 97.883, P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nIt is safe and feasible of laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization for patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension, and intraoperative vagus nerve-preserving can reduce volume of intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications. \n \n \nKey words: \nLiver cirrhosis; Portal hypertension; Splenectomy; Pericardial devascularization; Vagus nerve; Laparoscopy","PeriodicalId":36400,"journal":{"name":"中华消化外科杂志","volume":"18 1","pages":"1136-1141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-9752.2019.12.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension. Methods The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 425 patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension who were admitted to Northern Jiangsu People′s Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University were collected. There were 289 males and 136 females, aged (53±11)years, with a range from 21 to 79 years. All the patients were allocated into 3 periods according to the operation time, including 100 patients of early period from February 2012 to March 2014, 156 patients of mature technology period from April 2014 to August 2016, and 169 patients of technology innovation period from september 2016 to December 2018. The patients of early period and mature technology period underwent laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization, and the patients of technology innovation period underwent vagus nerve-preserving laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations; (2) postoperative situations; (3) follow-up. Patients were followed up by outpatient examination to detect the upper digestive rebleeding, gastric retention, and diarrhea up to March 2019. Sequential therapy of endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) was slectively performed on patients based on results of gastroscopy. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD, and comparison between groups was analyzed using ANOVA, and paired comparison was analyzed using the t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M (range), and comparison between groups was anlyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, and paired comparison was analyzed using the rank sum test. Count data were described as absolute numbers or percentages, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test and Fisher exact probability. Results (1) Surgical situations: the operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, cases with intraoperative blood transfusion, cases with conversion to open surgery, and cases with emergency operation for bleeding were (187±46)minutes, 150 mL (range, 50-1 300 mL), 2, 2 , 1 for patients of early period, (164±22)minutes, 50 mL (range, 30-100 mL), 1, 1, 1 for patients of mature technology period, and (150±18)minutes, 50 mL (range, 10-300 mL), 0 , 0 , 0 for patients of technology innovation period, respectively. There were significant differences in the operation time and volume of intraoperative blood loss between the three groups (F=55.482, χ2=94.620, P 0.05). (2) Postoperative situations: 425 patients had oral aspirin enteric-coated tablets for prevention of thrombus, with no perioperative death. Duration of postoperative hospital stay, cases with portal vein thrombosis at postoperative 7 days, cases with pancreatic fistula, cases with pulmonary infection, and cases with abdominal infection were (11.0±2.9)days, 46, 2, 1, 0 for patients of early period, (9.9±1.7)days, 81, 3, 0, 0 for patients of mature technology period, and (8.8±1.3)days, 83, 2, 1, 1 for patients of technology innovation period, respectively. There was a significant difference in the duration of postoperative hospital stay between the three groups (F=39.836, P 0.05) and no significant difference in the cases with pancreatic fistula, cases with pulmonary infection, or cases with abdominal infection between the three groups (P>0.05). Patients with portal vein thrombosis at postoperative 7 days had oral aspirin enteric-coated tablets or warfarin for treatment. Patients with pancreatic fistula, pulmonary infection, and abdominal infection were cured and discharged after conservative treatment. (3) Follow-up: all the 425 patients were followed up for 1-72 months, with a median follow-up of 36 months. Of the 425 patients, 261 underwent postoperative sequential therapy of EVL, including 133 patients of mature technology period and 128 patients of technology innovation period. The incidence rate of upper digestive rebleeding was 3.83%(10/261) of the 261 patients undergoing postoperative sequential therapy of EVL and 17.68%(29/164) of 164 patients without postoperative sequential therapy of EVL, showing a significant difference between them (χ2=23.185, P<0.05). The incidence rates of gastric retention and diarrhea were 96.24%(128/133) and 61.65%(82/133) for 133 patients undergoing sequential therapy of EVL in mature technology period, and 1.56%(2/128) and 3.91%(5/128) for 128 patients undergoing sequential therapy of EVL in technology innovation period, showing significant differences between them (χ2=233.876, 97.883, P<0.05). Conclusions It is safe and feasible of laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization for patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension, and intraoperative vagus nerve-preserving can reduce volume of intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications. Key words: Liver cirrhosis; Portal hypertension; Splenectomy; Pericardial devascularization; Vagus nerve; Laparoscopy
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜脾切除术联合心包断流术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症425例临床疗效分析
目的探讨腹腔镜脾切除术联合心包断流术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症的临床疗效。方法采用回顾性和描述性研究。收集扬州大学附属苏北人民医院收治的425例肝硬化门静脉高压症患者的临床病理资料。男性289例,女性136例,年龄(53±11)岁,年龄21 ~ 79岁。所有患者根据手术时间分为3期,其中前期100例(2012年2月- 2014年3月),技术成熟期156例(2014年4月- 2016年8月),技术创新期169例(2016年9月- 2018年12月)。技术早期和成熟期患者行腹腔镜脾切除术联合心包断流术,技术创新期患者行保留迷走神经的腹腔镜脾切除术联合心包断流术。观察指标:(1)手术情况;(2)术后情况;(3)跟进。随访至2019年3月,门诊检查患者是否出现上消化道再出血、胃潴留和腹泻。根据胃镜检查结果选择性地对患者进行内镜下静脉曲张结扎(EVL)序贯治疗。计量资料呈正态分布用Mean±SD表示,组间比较采用方差分析,配对比较采用t检验。偏态分布的计量资料用M(极差)表示,组间比较采用Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验,配对比较采用秩和检验。计数数据以绝对数字或百分比描述,组间比较采用卡方检验和Fisher精确概率进行分析。(1)手术情况:手术时间、术中失血,例术中输血、例开放手术,并例紧急手术出血(187±46)分钟,150毫升(范围、博彩300毫升),2,2,1对病人的早期,(164±22)分钟,50毫升(范围、30 - 100毫升),1,1,1对病人的成熟的技术,(150±18)分钟,50毫升(范围、10 - 300毫升),0,0,0技术创新时期的患者,分别。三组手术时间、术中出血量比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=55.482, χ2=94.620, p0.05)。(2)术后情况:425例患者口服阿司匹林肠溶片预防血栓形成,无围手术期死亡病例。术后住院时间、术后7天门静脉血栓、胰瘘、肺部感染、腹部感染分别为:早期患者(11.0±2.9)天、46、2、1、0天,技术成熟期患者(9.9±1.7)天、81、3、0天,技术创新期患者(8.8±1.3)天、83、2、1、1天。三组患者术后住院时间比较差异有统计学意义(F=39.836, P 0.05),胰瘘、肺部感染、腹部感染三组患者比较差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。术后7天门静脉血栓患者口服阿司匹林肠溶片或华法林治疗。胰瘘、肺部感染、腹部感染患者经保守治疗均治愈出院。(3)随访:425例患者均随访1 ~ 72个月,中位随访36个月。425例患者中,术后序贯EVL治疗261例,其中技术成熟期133例,技术创新期128例。261例术后接受EVL顺序治疗的患者上消化道再出血发生率为3.83%(10/261),164例未接受EVL顺序治疗的患者上消化道再出血发生率为17.68%(29/164),差异有统计学意义(χ2=23.185, P<0.05)。133例EVL序贯治疗患者在技术成熟期胃潴留和腹泻的发生率分别为96.24%(128/133)和61.65%(82/133),128例EVL序贯治疗患者在技术创新期胃潴留和腹泻的发生率分别为1.56%(2/128)和3.91%(5/128),差异有统计学意义(χ2=233.876、97.883,P<0.05)。 结论腹腔镜脾切除术联合心包断流术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症是安全可行的,术中保留迷走神经可减少术中出血量和术后并发症的发生。关键词:肝硬化;门静脉高压;脾切除术;心包devascularization;迷走神经;腹腔镜检查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华消化外科杂志
中华消化外科杂志 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4544
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Targeting Caregiver Psychopathology in Parent Management Training for Adolescents: A Scoping Review of Commercially Available Treatment Resources. Concept renovation: a new perspective of minimally invasive surgery Clinical strategies for COVID-19 in surgeons Clinical value of outpatient screening in department of general surgery during the COVID-19 outbreak Influencing factors and clinical significance of liver function damage in patients diagnosed with COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1