Can Enzymatic Treatment of Sugar Beet Pectins Reduce Coalescence Effects in High-Pressure Processes?

IF 3.2 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Colloids and Interfaces Pub Date : 2022-11-15 DOI:10.3390/colloids6040069
B. Bindereif, H. Karbstein, U. S. van der Schaaf
{"title":"Can Enzymatic Treatment of Sugar Beet Pectins Reduce Coalescence Effects in High-Pressure Processes?","authors":"B. Bindereif, H. Karbstein, U. S. van der Schaaf","doi":"10.3390/colloids6040069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While sugar beet pectins (SBPs) are well known for effectively stabilizing fine oil droplets in low-fat food and beverages, e.g., low-fat dressings and soft drinks, it often fails in products of higher oil contents. The aim of this study was to improve the emulsifying properties of SBPs and, consequently, their ability to reduce coalescence during high pressure homogenization of products with increased oil content. Therefore, the molecular size of SBPs was reduced by partial cleavage of the homogalacturonan backbone using the enzymes exo- and endo-polygalacturonanase and varying incubation times. The sizes of SBPs were compared based on the molecular size distribution and hydrodynamic diameter. In addition, to obtain information on the interfacial activity and adsorption rate of SBPs, the dynamic interfacial tension was measured by drop profile analysis tensiometry. The (non)modified SBPs were used as emulsifying agents in 30 wt% mct oil–water emulsions stabilized with 0.5 wt% SBP at pH 3, prepared by high-pressure homogenization (400–1000 bar). By analyzing the droplet size distributions, conclusions could be drawn about the coalescence that occurred after droplet breakup. It could be shown that SBPs modified by exo-polygalacturonanase stabilized the oil–water interface more rapidly, resulting in less coalescence and the smallest oil droplets. In contrast, SBPs modified with endo-polygalacturonanase resulted in poorer emulsification properties, and thus larger oil droplets with increasing incubation time. The differences could be attributed to the different cleavage pattern of the enzymes used. The results suggest that a minimum molecular size is required for the stabilization of fine oil droplets with SBPs as emulsifiers.","PeriodicalId":10433,"journal":{"name":"Colloids and Interfaces","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colloids and Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids6040069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While sugar beet pectins (SBPs) are well known for effectively stabilizing fine oil droplets in low-fat food and beverages, e.g., low-fat dressings and soft drinks, it often fails in products of higher oil contents. The aim of this study was to improve the emulsifying properties of SBPs and, consequently, their ability to reduce coalescence during high pressure homogenization of products with increased oil content. Therefore, the molecular size of SBPs was reduced by partial cleavage of the homogalacturonan backbone using the enzymes exo- and endo-polygalacturonanase and varying incubation times. The sizes of SBPs were compared based on the molecular size distribution and hydrodynamic diameter. In addition, to obtain information on the interfacial activity and adsorption rate of SBPs, the dynamic interfacial tension was measured by drop profile analysis tensiometry. The (non)modified SBPs were used as emulsifying agents in 30 wt% mct oil–water emulsions stabilized with 0.5 wt% SBP at pH 3, prepared by high-pressure homogenization (400–1000 bar). By analyzing the droplet size distributions, conclusions could be drawn about the coalescence that occurred after droplet breakup. It could be shown that SBPs modified by exo-polygalacturonanase stabilized the oil–water interface more rapidly, resulting in less coalescence and the smallest oil droplets. In contrast, SBPs modified with endo-polygalacturonanase resulted in poorer emulsification properties, and thus larger oil droplets with increasing incubation time. The differences could be attributed to the different cleavage pattern of the enzymes used. The results suggest that a minimum molecular size is required for the stabilization of fine oil droplets with SBPs as emulsifiers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甜菜果胶的酶处理能降低高压过程中的聚结效应吗?
虽然众所周知,甜菜果胶(SBP)能有效稳定低脂食品和饮料(如低脂调味品和软饮料)中的细油滴,但它在含油量较高的产品中往往失效。本研究的目的是提高SBP的乳化性能,从而提高其在油含量增加的产品高压均质过程中减少聚结的能力。因此,通过使用外半乳糖醛酸酶和内半乳糖醛酸蛋白酶部分切割高半乳糖醛酸主链和不同的孵育时间,SBP的分子大小减小。根据分子尺寸分布和流体动力学直径比较SBP的尺寸。此外,为了获得SBPs的界面活性和吸附速率的信息,通过液滴轮廓分析张力计测量了动态界面张力。将(非)改性的SBP用作30 wt%mct油水乳液中的乳化剂,该乳液在pH 3下用0.5 wt%SBP稳定,通过高压均化(400–1000 bar)制备。通过分析液滴尺寸分布,可以得出液滴破裂后发生聚结的结论。可以表明,外聚半乳糖醛酸酶修饰的SBP更快地稳定了油水界面,导致较少的聚结和最小的油滴。相反,用内聚半乳糖醛酸酶修饰的SBP导致较差的乳化性能,因此随着培养时间的增加,油滴变大。这种差异可归因于所用酶的不同切割模式。结果表明,用SBP作为乳化剂稳定细油滴需要最小的分子尺寸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Colloids and Interfaces
Colloids and Interfaces CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
64
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Polymer–Zeolite Composites: Synthesis, Characterization and Application The Onset and Early Stages of Dynamic Wetting of Superspreading and Non-Superspreading Trisiloxane Surfactant Solutions on Hydrophobic Surfaces Improving Foodborne Pathogen Control Using Green Nanosized Emulsions of Plectranthus hadiensis Phytochemicals Measurement of Dilational Modulus of an Adsorbed BSA Film Using Pendant Bubble Tensiometry: From a Clean Interface to Saturation Evaporation of Small Sessile Drop Deposited on a Horizontal Solid Surface: New Exact Solutions and Approximations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1