Different Ways of Being Emotional about the Past

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Filosofia Unisinos Pub Date : 2022-11-16 DOI:10.4013/fsu.2022.233.08
Marina Trakas
{"title":"Different Ways of Being Emotional about the Past","authors":"Marina Trakas","doi":"10.4013/fsu.2022.233.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nAccording to Dorothea Debus (2007), all emotional aspects related to an act of remembering are present and new emotional responses to the remembered past event. This is a common conception of the nature of the emotional aspect of personal memories, if not explicitly defended then at least implicitly accepted in the literature. In this article, I first criticize Debus’ arguments and demonstrate that she does not give us valid reasons to believe that all the emotional aspects related to a memory are present and new emotional responses to that past event. I then criticize Debus’ thesis tout court for being a direct consequence of assuming a particular conceptualization of the nature of emotions: emotions as physiological changes. Finally, based on a different conceptualization of emotions that focuses on their relational nature, I propose an alternative framework for analyzing the different possible emotional aspects of our personal memories. This leads me to conclude, contrary to Debus, that some emotional aspects of our memories are not occurrent emotions but are better conceived as a sort of quasi-emotions.\nKeywords: Personal memory, emotion, quasi-emotion, appraisal.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":41989,"journal":{"name":"Filosofia Unisinos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofia Unisinos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2022.233.08","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to Dorothea Debus (2007), all emotional aspects related to an act of remembering are present and new emotional responses to the remembered past event. This is a common conception of the nature of the emotional aspect of personal memories, if not explicitly defended then at least implicitly accepted in the literature. In this article, I first criticize Debus’ arguments and demonstrate that she does not give us valid reasons to believe that all the emotional aspects related to a memory are present and new emotional responses to that past event. I then criticize Debus’ thesis tout court for being a direct consequence of assuming a particular conceptualization of the nature of emotions: emotions as physiological changes. Finally, based on a different conceptualization of emotions that focuses on their relational nature, I propose an alternative framework for analyzing the different possible emotional aspects of our personal memories. This leads me to conclude, contrary to Debus, that some emotional aspects of our memories are not occurrent emotions but are better conceived as a sort of quasi-emotions. Keywords: Personal memory, emotion, quasi-emotion, appraisal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对过去情绪化的不同方式
根据Dorothea Debus(2007)的说法,与记忆行为相关的所有情绪方面都是对记忆中的过去事件的当前和新的情绪反应。这是一个关于个人记忆情感方面性质的常见概念,如果没有明确的辩护,那么至少在文学中被隐含地接受了。在这篇文章中,我首先批评了德彪斯的论点,并证明她没有给我们正当的理由相信与记忆有关的所有情感方面都是存在的,以及对过去事件的新的情感反应。然后,我批评德彪斯的论文吹捧法庭是对情绪本质进行特定概念化的直接结果:情绪是生理变化。最后,基于对情绪的不同概念化,重点是它们的关系性质,我提出了一个分析我们个人记忆中不同可能的情绪方面的替代框架。这让我得出结论,与德彪斯相反,我们记忆中的一些情绪方面不是偶然的情绪,而是一种准情绪。关键词:个人记忆、情绪、准情绪、评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Filosofia Unisinos
Filosofia Unisinos PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
O republicanismo neorromano na concepção de liberdade de J. S. Mill Preceitos e consequências da unificação de lógica e metafísica por Hegel: A desobediência civil como um direito de defesa em Rawls e uma tentativa de resposta à crítica de Raz Verdade e Justiça em Emmanuel Levinas Uma avaliação crítica da implausibilidade teórica do socioconstrutivismo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1