Measuring Repurchase Decisions by Accelerating Repurchase Behavior

IF 4 Q2 BUSINESS Australasian Marketing Journal Pub Date : 2021-03-12 DOI:10.1177/18393349211000353
Songting Dong, P. Zhao, Deqiang Zou
{"title":"Measuring Repurchase Decisions by Accelerating Repurchase Behavior","authors":"Songting Dong, P. Zhao, Deqiang Zou","doi":"10.1177/18393349211000353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Repurchase intention questions are routinely used in marketing research and practices to measure consumers’ repurchase decisions. They are easy to use but suffer from a few biases and weak predictive power. This article identifies three biases, namely, projection bias, lack-of-context bias, and hypothetical bias. A new method, repurchase acceleration (RA), is proposed targeting these biases. In RA, researchers buy back respondents’ currently owned products to ensure they are in the market, provide them with a representative choice set to mimic the repurchase market context, and attach real-life consequences to mimic the incentives in their real-life repurchases. An empirical study demonstrates that RA predicts significantly better than repurchase intention models and captures more than 3 times as much information as the best repurchase intention model does. We recommend that RA is used for high-value, long purchase-cycle products for a precise measure of consumers’ repurchase decisions for high-stake marketing decisions.","PeriodicalId":47402,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Marketing Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"228 - 236"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/18393349211000353","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Marketing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18393349211000353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Repurchase intention questions are routinely used in marketing research and practices to measure consumers’ repurchase decisions. They are easy to use but suffer from a few biases and weak predictive power. This article identifies three biases, namely, projection bias, lack-of-context bias, and hypothetical bias. A new method, repurchase acceleration (RA), is proposed targeting these biases. In RA, researchers buy back respondents’ currently owned products to ensure they are in the market, provide them with a representative choice set to mimic the repurchase market context, and attach real-life consequences to mimic the incentives in their real-life repurchases. An empirical study demonstrates that RA predicts significantly better than repurchase intention models and captures more than 3 times as much information as the best repurchase intention model does. We recommend that RA is used for high-value, long purchase-cycle products for a precise measure of consumers’ repurchase decisions for high-stake marketing decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过加速回购行为衡量回购决策
在市场研究和实践中,回购意愿问题经常被用来衡量消费者的回购决策。它们易于使用,但存在一些偏差和较弱的预测能力。本文确定了三种偏见,即投射偏见、缺乏背景偏见和假设偏见。针对这些偏差,提出了一种新的方法——回购加速(RA)。在RA中,研究人员回购受访者目前拥有的产品,以确保他们在市场上,为他们提供一个有代表性的选择集来模拟回购市场背景,并附加现实生活中的后果来模拟他们现实生活中的回购激励。实证研究表明,RA的预测效果明显优于回购意愿模型,其信息量是最佳回购意愿模型的3倍以上。我们建议将RA用于高价值、长购买周期的产品,以精确衡量消费者对高风险营销决策的再购买决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) is the official journal of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy (ANZMAC). It is an academic journal for the dissemination of leading studies in marketing, for researchers, students, educators, scholars, and practitioners. The objective of the AMJ is to publish articles that enrich and contribute to the advancement of the discipline and the practice of marketing. Therefore, manuscripts accepted for publication will be theoretically sound, offer significant research findings and insights, and suggest meaningful implications and recommendations. Articles reporting original empirical research should include defensible methodology and findings consistent with rigorous academic standards.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Equity in Australian Higher Education Using Fuzzy Trace Theory Simplifying Sentiment Analysis on Social Media: A Step-by-Step Approach Engaging Robo-advisors in Financial Advisory Services: The Role of Psychological Comfort and Client Psychological Characteristics Why do Consumers Forgive Online Travel Agencies? A Multi-study Approach In-Store Communications: Understanding the Mundane, the Bright Sides, and the Unexpected
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1