The use of megaprostheses in severe bone loss due to nononcological indications: Three case reports and literature review

Ihab Alaqrabawi, Zuhdi O Elifranji, M. Alshrouf, Abdulrahman Karam, Aseel N Abdin, Jihad Al-Ajlouni
{"title":"The use of megaprostheses in severe bone loss due to nononcological indications: Three case reports and literature review","authors":"Ihab Alaqrabawi, Zuhdi O Elifranji, M. Alshrouf, Abdulrahman Karam, Aseel N Abdin, Jihad Al-Ajlouni","doi":"10.4103/mj.mj_1_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reconstruction of severe bone loss and large skeletal defects using biologic materials with autograft or allograft and using tumor endoprostheses (megaprostheses) helped orthopedic surgeons as well as patients in the sparing of limbs. Several types of megaprostheses have been described in the literature for oncological indications with unpredictable outcomes and complication rates. We review single-centered experience of three nononcological cases to assess the safety of using megaprostheses in patients with severe bone loss without malignant disease. In addition, a literature review on the previous use of megaprostheses as treatment modality, their outcome, and complications was done until August 2022. All the participants were found to be good candidates for megaprostheses implants after their refusal of amputation. Their infections were eradicated before the implants, and also, the range of movement and improvements are satisfactory. In addition, according to the literature compared to the alternative of amputation, this operation has proven to be life-altering and revolutionary for many patients. We believe that megaprostheses might be a good limb salvage alternative in patients with significant bone loss and massive skeletal deformities, even in nononcological situations. Future studies should focus on ways to improve the material and design of the megaprostheses and study the long-term complications and survival rate of the implants.","PeriodicalId":33069,"journal":{"name":"mjl@ lmstnSry@ lTby@","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mjl@ lmstnSry@ lTby@","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mj.mj_1_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reconstruction of severe bone loss and large skeletal defects using biologic materials with autograft or allograft and using tumor endoprostheses (megaprostheses) helped orthopedic surgeons as well as patients in the sparing of limbs. Several types of megaprostheses have been described in the literature for oncological indications with unpredictable outcomes and complication rates. We review single-centered experience of three nononcological cases to assess the safety of using megaprostheses in patients with severe bone loss without malignant disease. In addition, a literature review on the previous use of megaprostheses as treatment modality, their outcome, and complications was done until August 2022. All the participants were found to be good candidates for megaprostheses implants after their refusal of amputation. Their infections were eradicated before the implants, and also, the range of movement and improvements are satisfactory. In addition, according to the literature compared to the alternative of amputation, this operation has proven to be life-altering and revolutionary for many patients. We believe that megaprostheses might be a good limb salvage alternative in patients with significant bone loss and massive skeletal deformities, even in nononcological situations. Future studies should focus on ways to improve the material and design of the megaprostheses and study the long-term complications and survival rate of the implants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大型假体在非肿瘤指征所致严重骨丢失中的应用:3例报告及文献回顾
使用自体或同种异体生物材料和肿瘤内假体(大型假体)重建严重骨丢失和大面积骨骼缺损,有助于骨科医生和患者保留肢体。几种类型的巨型假体已经在文献中描述了肿瘤适应症与不可预测的结果和并发症的发生率。我们回顾了三个非肿瘤病例的单中心经验,以评估在无恶性疾病的严重骨质流失患者中使用巨型假体的安全性。此外,截至2022年8月,对先前使用大型假体作为治疗方式、其结果和并发症的文献进行了回顾。所有的参与者在拒绝截肢后都被发现是大型假体植入的好候选人。他们的感染在植入之前就被根除了,而且,活动范围和改善是令人满意的。此外,根据文献,与截肢的替代方法相比,这种手术已被证明对许多患者来说是改变生活和革命性的。我们相信大型假体可能是一个很好的残肢保留替代患者显著骨质流失和大量骨骼畸形,甚至在非肿瘤情况下。未来的研究应着眼于如何改进大型假体的材料和设计,并研究种植体的长期并发症和存活率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of activity of xanthine oxidase on some biomarkers in patients with kidney stones in Iraqi Patients Blood lead level and renal function: Sample of Iraqi patients attending Baghdad Teaching Hospital in 2022 Morphometric measurements of carrying angle of the elbow among sample of Iraqi medical students: An observational, cross-sectional study Dimensions of the sphenoid and ethmoid sinuses on computed tomography: Clinical implications and role in sex determination Study of the link between ligament laxity and the occurrence of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1