{"title":"Tripwires and Alliance Reassurance: An Exchange – The Authors Reply","authors":"Brian Blankenship, Erik Lin-Greenberg","doi":"10.1080/09636412.2022.2140599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"cent) of US military events in Asia fall into Blankenship and Lin-Greenberg’s worst category—transient demonstrations. These operations—like FONOPS, routine operations through the Taiwan Strait, and flyovers around the North Korean Peninsula—supposedly demonstrate low resolve and low capability. It is an intriguing, and researchable, policy question about why the United States would choose to focus so much of its efforts on precisely the types of activities that Blankenship and Lin-Greenberg argue do little to reassure allies, and thus do little to deter adversaries. After all, most of the activities that fall within the authors’ reassurance typology are not primarily meant to reassure at all, but to deter. This inconsistency raises the additional question of whether the purpose of the military activity determines whether it signals high resolve and/or capability.","PeriodicalId":47478,"journal":{"name":"Security Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"750 - 756"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Security Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2022.2140599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
cent) of US military events in Asia fall into Blankenship and Lin-Greenberg’s worst category—transient demonstrations. These operations—like FONOPS, routine operations through the Taiwan Strait, and flyovers around the North Korean Peninsula—supposedly demonstrate low resolve and low capability. It is an intriguing, and researchable, policy question about why the United States would choose to focus so much of its efforts on precisely the types of activities that Blankenship and Lin-Greenberg argue do little to reassure allies, and thus do little to deter adversaries. After all, most of the activities that fall within the authors’ reassurance typology are not primarily meant to reassure at all, but to deter. This inconsistency raises the additional question of whether the purpose of the military activity determines whether it signals high resolve and/or capability.
期刊介绍:
Security Studies publishes innovative scholarly manuscripts that make a significant contribution – whether theoretical, empirical, or both – to our understanding of international security. Studies that do not emphasize the causes and consequences of war or the sources and conditions of peace fall outside the journal’s domain. Security Studies features articles that develop, test, and debate theories of international security – that is, articles that address an important research question, display innovation in research, contribute in a novel way to a body of knowledge, and (as appropriate) demonstrate theoretical development with state-of-the art use of appropriate methodological tools. While we encourage authors to discuss the policy implications of their work, articles that are primarily policy-oriented do not fit the journal’s mission. The journal publishes articles that challenge the conventional wisdom in the area of international security studies. Security Studies includes a wide range of topics ranging from nuclear proliferation and deterrence, civil-military relations, strategic culture, ethnic conflicts and their resolution, epidemics and national security, democracy and foreign-policy decision making, developments in qualitative and multi-method research, and the future of security studies.