Best Practices for Improving the Quality of the Online Course Design and Learners Experience

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Continuing Higher Education Pub Date : 2020-09-02 DOI:10.1080/07377363.2020.1776558
E. Lewis
{"title":"Best Practices for Improving the Quality of the Online Course Design and Learners Experience","authors":"E. Lewis","doi":"10.1080/07377363.2020.1776558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract For over 20 years, I have worked for various types of organizations as a higher education administrator, consultant, and Quality Matters Peer Reviewer. Some of my responsibilities consisted of leading the instructional, design, development, delivery, and maintenance of all online courses. The purpose of this article is to present some of the online course content, instructional design, and technology challenges that have continued to emerge over the past 20-plus years. The challenges were related to content that does not align with the iNACOL, Virtual Learning Leadership Alliance, or Quality Matters standards for course design and other best practices. Some of the challenges were associated with not providing: (a) a course overview; (b) clearly stated, appropriate, and measurable outcomes; (c) culturally inclusive materials, images, and other resources designed to support the learning needs of diverse learners; (d) accessible online courses; (e) multiple ways to engage learners; (f) inclusive instructions; (g) assessments and rubrics that clearly aligned with learning outcomes; and (h) consistency in the user interface experience from one course to the next. This article also presents recommendations and suggestions to improve the quality of the online course design process based on national standards and other best practices for quality improvement of online courses and learners’ experiences.","PeriodicalId":44549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Higher Education","volume":"69 1","pages":"61 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07377363.2020.1776558","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2020.1776558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Abstract For over 20 years, I have worked for various types of organizations as a higher education administrator, consultant, and Quality Matters Peer Reviewer. Some of my responsibilities consisted of leading the instructional, design, development, delivery, and maintenance of all online courses. The purpose of this article is to present some of the online course content, instructional design, and technology challenges that have continued to emerge over the past 20-plus years. The challenges were related to content that does not align with the iNACOL, Virtual Learning Leadership Alliance, or Quality Matters standards for course design and other best practices. Some of the challenges were associated with not providing: (a) a course overview; (b) clearly stated, appropriate, and measurable outcomes; (c) culturally inclusive materials, images, and other resources designed to support the learning needs of diverse learners; (d) accessible online courses; (e) multiple ways to engage learners; (f) inclusive instructions; (g) assessments and rubrics that clearly aligned with learning outcomes; and (h) consistency in the user interface experience from one course to the next. This article also presents recommendations and suggestions to improve the quality of the online course design process based on national standards and other best practices for quality improvement of online courses and learners’ experiences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高在线课程设计质量和学习者体验的最佳实践
摘要20多年来,我一直在各种类型的组织工作,担任高等教育管理员、顾问和质量问题同行评审员。我的一些职责包括领导所有在线课程的教学、设计、开发、交付和维护。本文的目的是介绍在过去20多年中不断出现的一些在线课程内容、教学设计和技术挑战。这些挑战与内容不符合iNACOL、虚拟学习领导力联盟或课程设计和其他最佳实践的质量问题标准有关。一些挑战与没有提供有关:(a)课程概述;(b) 明确、适当和可衡量的结果;(c) 具有文化包容性的材料、图像和其他资源,旨在支持不同学习者的学习需求;(d) 无障碍在线课程;(e) 吸引学习者的多种方式;(f) 包含指令;(g) 与学习成果明确一致的评估和准则;以及(h)从一个课程到下一个课程的用户界面体验的一致性。本文还根据国家标准和其他提高在线课程质量和学习者体验的最佳实践,提出了提高在线课程设计过程质量的建议和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Continuing Higher Education
Journal of Continuing Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dopamine neurons drive spatiotemporally heterogeneous striatal dopamine signals during learning. A nucleoid-associated protein is involved in the emergence of antibiotic resistance by promoting the frequent exchange of the replicative DNA polymerase in M. smegmatis. Nontraditional Students and Credit for Prior Learning—Analytical Thinking, Clout, Drives, and Motives The Relations Among Math Anxiety, Math Self-Construct, and Math Achievement in Older and Underserved Minority Students Examining the Perception of Military Culture in the Undergraduate University Classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1