The Effect of Instructional Methods in Teaching Speaking to Young Learners

Nita Kaniadewi, Widi Sriyanto
{"title":"The Effect of Instructional Methods in Teaching Speaking to Young Learners","authors":"Nita Kaniadewi, Widi Sriyanto","doi":"10.22236/JIPD.V4I1.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study searched for empirical evidence of which instructional method, either Presentation-Practice-Production (PPP) or Task-based Learning (TBL), was more effective in teaching speaking to real beginners of young learners. The selected samples were taken by non-random sampling from Foundation II level with ten students for each class. This study, whose data was collected through an oral test, was an experimental research by using T-test at 0.05 significance level. The findings revealed that t-computation was higher than t-table (+2,11 > +2,10). It implied that the mean of PPP class was significantly higher than TBL class. The findings above led to a conclusion that the use of PPP was more effective than TBL in teaching speaking to young learners. It was also discovered that drilling activities, which occurred intensively in PPP, yet not in TBL, gave a great contribution in supporting the effectiveness of PPP in teaching speaking. Drillings were beneficial and met the characteristics of the students who belonged to the population of this study. Therefore, PPP, rather than TBL, was more recommended in teaching speaking to real beginners of young learners whose characteristics met the ones mentioned in the discussion below. However, since drillings can be very mechanical and meaningless, in order not to cause boredom, the length of time allocated for the activities should be considered carefully. Moreover, for an optimum result, drillings must always be accompanied by communicative activities.","PeriodicalId":55783,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22236/JIPD.V4I1.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study searched for empirical evidence of which instructional method, either Presentation-Practice-Production (PPP) or Task-based Learning (TBL), was more effective in teaching speaking to real beginners of young learners. The selected samples were taken by non-random sampling from Foundation II level with ten students for each class. This study, whose data was collected through an oral test, was an experimental research by using T-test at 0.05 significance level. The findings revealed that t-computation was higher than t-table (+2,11 > +2,10). It implied that the mean of PPP class was significantly higher than TBL class. The findings above led to a conclusion that the use of PPP was more effective than TBL in teaching speaking to young learners. It was also discovered that drilling activities, which occurred intensively in PPP, yet not in TBL, gave a great contribution in supporting the effectiveness of PPP in teaching speaking. Drillings were beneficial and met the characteristics of the students who belonged to the population of this study. Therefore, PPP, rather than TBL, was more recommended in teaching speaking to real beginners of young learners whose characteristics met the ones mentioned in the discussion below. However, since drillings can be very mechanical and meaningless, in order not to cause boredom, the length of time allocated for the activities should be considered carefully. Moreover, for an optimum result, drillings must always be accompanied by communicative activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教学方法在少儿英语教学中的作用
本研究寻找经验证据,证明演示-实践-生产(PPP)或任务型学习(TBL)哪一种教学方法对真正的初学者或年轻学习者的口语教学更有效。所选样本采用非随机抽样的方法,从基础二年级每班10名学生中抽取。本研究数据采用口腔检验,采用0.05显著性水平的t检验进行实验研究。结果表明,t-计算量高于t-table (+2,11 bb0 +2,10)。这意味着PPP类别的平均值显著高于TBL类别。以上的研究结果得出结论,PPP比TBL在对年轻学习者的口语教学中更有效。我们还发现,演练活动在PPP中较多出现,而在TBL中较少出现,这对支持PPP在口语教学中的有效性有很大的贡献。钻孔是有益的,并且符合属于本研究人群的学生的特征。因此,我们更推荐PPP而不是TBL来针对真正的初学者或符合下面讨论的特点的年轻学习者进行教学。然而,由于钻井可能是非常机械和无意义的,为了不造成无聊,应该仔细考虑分配给活动的时间长度。此外,为了达到最佳效果,钻孔必须始终伴随着交流活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hubungan Motivasi Menjaga Lingkungan Dengan Sikap Peduli Lingkungan Analisis Epistemological Obstacle Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif The Effectiveness of Snakes and Ladders Media on Sex Education for Children With Intellectual Disabilities Penggunaan Strategi Kooperatif Model Group Investigation Bagi Siswa yang Mengalami Attention Devicit Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD) Implementasi Bahan Ajar Berbasis Kain Rentang dan Papan Nama Materi Membaca Cepat di Sekolah Dasar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1