Do Policies to Increase Access to Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder Work?

IF 3.1 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS American Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1086/722980
E. Barrette, Leemore S. Dafny, Karen Shen
{"title":"Do Policies to Increase Access to Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder Work?","authors":"E. Barrette, Leemore S. Dafny, Karen Shen","doi":"10.1086/722980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even among commercially insured individuals, opioid use disorder is undertreated in the United States: nearly half receive no treatment within six months of a new diagnosis. Using a difference-in-differences specification exploiting the extension of insurance parity requirements for substance use disorder treatment to small-group enrollees in 2014, we find that parity increases utilization of residential treatment but decreases utilization of agonist medications, the standard of care. We find direct interventions to increase access to medication may be more promising: increases in the county-level share of physicians able to prescribe agonists are associated with substitution toward treatment that includes medication.","PeriodicalId":45056,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Economics","volume":"9 1","pages":"297 - 330"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722980","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Even among commercially insured individuals, opioid use disorder is undertreated in the United States: nearly half receive no treatment within six months of a new diagnosis. Using a difference-in-differences specification exploiting the extension of insurance parity requirements for substance use disorder treatment to small-group enrollees in 2014, we find that parity increases utilization of residential treatment but decreases utilization of agonist medications, the standard of care. We find direct interventions to increase access to medication may be more promising: increases in the county-level share of physicians able to prescribe agonists are associated with substitution toward treatment that includes medication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增加阿片类药物使用障碍治疗机会的政策有效吗?
即使在商业保险的个人中,阿片类药物使用障碍在美国也治疗不足:近一半的人在新诊断的六个月内没有得到治疗。使用差异说明,利用2014年将药物使用障碍治疗的保险平价要求扩展到小群体参与者,我们发现平价增加了住院治疗的利用率,但降低了激动剂药物(护理标准)的利用率。我们发现,增加药物获取的直接干预措施可能更有希望:能够开激动剂的县级医生比例的增加与包括药物在内的治疗的替代有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health Economics (AJHE) provides a forum for the in-depth analysis of health care markets and individual health behaviors. The articles appearing in AJHE are authored by scholars from universities, private research organizations, government, and industry. Subjects of interest include competition among private insurers, hospitals, and physicians; impacts of public insurance programs, including the Affordable Care Act; pharmaceutical innovation and regulation; medical device supply; the rise of obesity and its consequences; the influence and growth of aging populations; and much more.
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Post-Acute Care Payment Reform on Caregiving From Lawn Care to Home Care: Undocumented Immigration and Aging in Place Heterogeneous Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Emergency Department Visits and Payer Composition among Older Adults by Race and Ethnicity Increased Schooling Reduces Hospitalization Later in Life: New Evidence with Optimal Instruments from the United States Financial Risk and the Decision of Small Employers to Self-Fund Health Insurance: Evidence from Stop Loss Regulation in California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1