‘We are the ones who know the intimacies of the soil’: Grazier claims to belonging and changing land relations in Cape York Peninsula, Queensland

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Australian Journal of Anthropology Pub Date : 2021-11-14 DOI:10.1111/taja.12412
Mardi Reardon-Smith
{"title":"‘We are the ones who know the intimacies of the soil’: Grazier claims to belonging and changing land relations in Cape York Peninsula, Queensland","authors":"Mardi Reardon-Smith","doi":"10.1111/taja.12412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Across Cape York Peninsula, the cattle grazing industry has declined in recent decades due to falling cattle prices, shorter wet seasons and land tenure changes. Remaining graziers perceive their status in the region as increasingly marginal and explain this precarity with the ‘locking up’ of Cape York land regimes and environments by National Parks and Aboriginal interests. Based on 14 months of ethnographic research in south-east Cape York conducted in 2018–2019, in this article I describe and analyse how graziers construct their claims to belonging in the region in response to land tenure changes. Drawing on recent scholarship on non-Indigenous forms of belonging in settler states and using the case study of one particular grazing family, I discuss how graziers position themselves as those who ‘know the intimacies of the soil’, as one grazier stated, due to multigenerational work on the land. Their claim to belonging tends to ignore prior Aboriginal occupation and instead emphasises their long-term relationships with local Aboriginal families, while the third main stakeholder in the region, Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, is perceived as a kind of dispossessor representing non-local ‘Green’ ideologies and interests.</p>","PeriodicalId":45452,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Anthropology","volume":"32 3","pages":"340-355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/taja.12412","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Across Cape York Peninsula, the cattle grazing industry has declined in recent decades due to falling cattle prices, shorter wet seasons and land tenure changes. Remaining graziers perceive their status in the region as increasingly marginal and explain this precarity with the ‘locking up’ of Cape York land regimes and environments by National Parks and Aboriginal interests. Based on 14 months of ethnographic research in south-east Cape York conducted in 2018–2019, in this article I describe and analyse how graziers construct their claims to belonging in the region in response to land tenure changes. Drawing on recent scholarship on non-Indigenous forms of belonging in settler states and using the case study of one particular grazing family, I discuss how graziers position themselves as those who ‘know the intimacies of the soil’, as one grazier stated, due to multigenerational work on the land. Their claim to belonging tends to ignore prior Aboriginal occupation and instead emphasises their long-term relationships with local Aboriginal families, while the third main stakeholder in the region, Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, is perceived as a kind of dispossessor representing non-local ‘Green’ ideologies and interests.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们是了解土壤亲密关系的人”:Grazier声称自己属于昆士兰州约克角半岛,并正在改变土地关系
近几十年来,由于牛价下跌、雨季缩短和土地权属变化,整个约克角半岛的畜牧业都在衰退。剩下的牧民认为他们在该地区的地位越来越边缘化,并将这种不稳定性解释为国家公园和土著利益“锁定”了约克角的土地制度和环境。基于2018-2019年在约克角东南部进行的为期14个月的民族志研究,本文描述并分析了牧民如何根据土地权属变化构建他们在该地区的归属主张。根据最近关于移民国家非土著形式归属的学术研究,并利用一个特定放牧家庭的案例研究,我讨论了牧民如何将自己定位为“了解土壤的亲密关系”的人,正如一位牧民所说,由于几代人都在土地上工作。他们对归属的主张往往忽略了先前的土著占领,而是强调他们与当地土著家庭的长期关系,而该地区的第三个主要利益相关者——昆士兰公园和野生动物管理局,则被视为一种代表非本地“绿色”意识形态和利益的剥夺者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Editorial The Fences: A webcomic on collective debt and ruination in Paraguay Fire's habit: Elemental media and the politics of apprehension Filming jilba: Sensing beyond the exclusionary fictions of climate science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1