Prosumption for Social Sustainability: Social-media Posting of DIY-cooking Outcomes During COVID-19

Pub Date : 2022-06-02 DOI:10.13052/jrss0974-8024.15115
Vibha Trivedi, Krishan Kumar Pandey, A. Trivedi
{"title":"Prosumption for Social Sustainability: Social-media Posting of DIY-cooking Outcomes During COVID-19","authors":"Vibha Trivedi, Krishan Kumar Pandey, A. Trivedi","doi":"10.13052/jrss0974-8024.15115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sharing of Do-It-Yourself (DIY) cooking outcomes on various social media platforms was one of the most visible phenomena on the digital landscapes during COVID-19 led lockdowns. Since the prosumption of food is not considered as a source of alternative food system only, but also as a source of pleasure, DIY-cooking-related social media posts during the lockdown were prevalent among internet users. This paper examines variations in the social media posting behavior of food prosumers based on four individual and three social factors of gender, age, marital status, and family structure. Responses from 198 Facebook food community members were used to test the statistical hypotheses. The analyses report that the need for entertainment value while posting on social media was different among different demographic factors, whereas self-discovery and social enhancement did not exhibit variations across demographics. The need for social presence mattered more for unmarried people during social isolation whereas females used DIY-cooking posting to fulfil the need for uniqueness. The implications for social sustainability and business practices are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13052/jrss0974-8024.15115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sharing of Do-It-Yourself (DIY) cooking outcomes on various social media platforms was one of the most visible phenomena on the digital landscapes during COVID-19 led lockdowns. Since the prosumption of food is not considered as a source of alternative food system only, but also as a source of pleasure, DIY-cooking-related social media posts during the lockdown were prevalent among internet users. This paper examines variations in the social media posting behavior of food prosumers based on four individual and three social factors of gender, age, marital status, and family structure. Responses from 198 Facebook food community members were used to test the statistical hypotheses. The analyses report that the need for entertainment value while posting on social media was different among different demographic factors, whereas self-discovery and social enhancement did not exhibit variations across demographics. The need for social presence mattered more for unmarried people during social isolation whereas females used DIY-cooking posting to fulfil the need for uniqueness. The implications for social sustainability and business practices are also discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
消费促进社会可持续发展:2019冠状病毒病期间diy烹饪成果的社交媒体发布
在新冠肺炎导致的封锁期间,在各种社交媒体平台上分享自己动手烹饪的结果是数字景观中最明显的现象之一。由于食物的生产不仅被视为替代食品系统的来源,而且被视为快乐的来源,因此在封锁期间,与DIY烹饪相关的社交媒体帖子在互联网用户中流行。本文基于性别、年龄、婚姻状况和家庭结构这四个个人和三个社会因素,研究了食品消费者在社交媒体上发布行为的变化。来自198名Facebook食品社区成员的回复被用来检验统计假设。分析报告称,在社交媒体上发帖时对娱乐价值的需求在不同的人口统计因素中是不同的,而自我发现和社交增强在人口统计中没有表现出差异。在社交隔离期间,未婚人士对社交存在的需求更为重要,而女性则使用DIY烹饪帖子来满足独特性的需求。还讨论了对社会可持续性和商业实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1