Participatory ergonomics approaches to design and intervention in workspaces: a literature review

Vitor Rodrigues, Raoni Rocha
{"title":"Participatory ergonomics approaches to design and intervention in workspaces: a literature review","authors":"Vitor Rodrigues, Raoni Rocha","doi":"10.1080/1463922X.2022.2095457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Participatory ergonomics relies on the involvement of people to constitute or improve their work environments. The present study aims to answer through a literature review how ergonomic interventions are performed in these environments. The research focussed on workspace design and processes related to participative ergonomics. The search in Scopus was performed for the period 2016 to 2020. From 200 articles, 28 were tabulated for content analysis encompassing the themes of ergonomic approach modes, use of intermediate objects and technological solutions adopted. The majority of the studies found were inserted in hospital, office and maritime/port environments. The results show that ergonomics approaches face diverse challenges: financial and time constraints, power asymmetries, experience levels, social, cultural and individual issues. Nevertheless, it sets out to develop skills, activities, competencies, and to organise these in a global and structured way. Further studies in a wide diversity of databases are needed to follow up the analysis of such approaches and conceptions of work activity. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY This study conducted a review of the literature on ergonomic approaches in a variety of workspaces, whether they are being transformed or designed. Attention was sought for commonalities of approaches that resulted in the topics regarding intermediate objects and the technological impact on recent ergonomic interventions. The main finding denotes a greater need to consolidate virtual and physical tools and methods and to investigate an intervention framework that is applicable to most interventions, in addition to responding to the major challenges pointed out by the articles.","PeriodicalId":22852,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science","volume":"24 1","pages":"413 - 428"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2022.2095457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Participatory ergonomics relies on the involvement of people to constitute or improve their work environments. The present study aims to answer through a literature review how ergonomic interventions are performed in these environments. The research focussed on workspace design and processes related to participative ergonomics. The search in Scopus was performed for the period 2016 to 2020. From 200 articles, 28 were tabulated for content analysis encompassing the themes of ergonomic approach modes, use of intermediate objects and technological solutions adopted. The majority of the studies found were inserted in hospital, office and maritime/port environments. The results show that ergonomics approaches face diverse challenges: financial and time constraints, power asymmetries, experience levels, social, cultural and individual issues. Nevertheless, it sets out to develop skills, activities, competencies, and to organise these in a global and structured way. Further studies in a wide diversity of databases are needed to follow up the analysis of such approaches and conceptions of work activity. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY This study conducted a review of the literature on ergonomic approaches in a variety of workspaces, whether they are being transformed or designed. Attention was sought for commonalities of approaches that resulted in the topics regarding intermediate objects and the technological impact on recent ergonomic interventions. The main finding denotes a greater need to consolidate virtual and physical tools and methods and to investigate an intervention framework that is applicable to most interventions, in addition to responding to the major challenges pointed out by the articles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作空间设计和干预的参与式人体工程学方法:文献综述
参与式人机工程学依靠人们的参与来构建或改善他们的工作环境。本研究旨在通过文献综述来回答如何在这些环境中进行人体工程学干预。研究的重点是与参与式人体工程学相关的工作空间设计和流程。在Scopus中搜索的时间为2016年至2020年。从200篇文章中,有28篇被制成表格,用于内容分析,包括人体工程学方法模式、中间对象的使用和采用的技术解决方案的主题。发现的大多数研究都是在医院、办公室和海事/港口环境中进行的。结果表明,人体工程学方法面临着各种各样的挑战:资金和时间限制、权力不对称、经验水平、社会、文化和个人问题。然而,它的目的是发展技能、活动和能力,并以全球和结构化的方式组织这些活动。需要对各种各样的数据基进行进一步的研究,以便对这种方法和工作活动的概念进行后续分析。本研究对各种工作空间中人体工程学方法的文献进行了回顾,无论它们是被改造还是被设计。会议力求注意导致中间物体和对最近人体工程学干预的技术影响的主题的方法的共性。主要发现表明,除了应对文章指出的主要挑战外,更需要巩固虚拟和物理工具和方法,并调查适用于大多数干预措施的干预框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Conceptual framework for the design and development of sustainability-oriented products: toward EQUID 4.0 Trust building with artificial intelligence: comparing with human in investment behaviour, emotional arousal and neuro activities Establishing driving simulator validity: drawbacks of null-hypothesis significance testing when compared to equivalence tests and Bayes factors The influence of industry 4.0, internet of things, and physical-cyber systems on human factors: a case study of workers in Indonesian oil and gas refineries A theoretical model of industrial accidents investigations: a conceptualization of the mental processes that trigger and control investigative activities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1