Racial Diversity and Measuring Merit: Evidence from Boston's Exam School Admissions

IF 1.7 3区 教育学 Q2 ECONOMICS Education Finance and Policy Pub Date : 2021-02-25 DOI:10.1162/edfp_a_00343
M. Rucinski, J. Goodman
{"title":"Racial Diversity and Measuring Merit: Evidence from Boston's Exam School Admissions","authors":"M. Rucinski, J. Goodman","doi":"10.1162/edfp_a_00343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The impact of admissions process design on the racial diversity of schools and colleges has sparked heated debates. We study the pipeline into Boston's three public exam schools to understand racial gaps in enrollment. Admission to these schools has historically been based on a combination of grade point average (GPA) and a score on an optional test from a private developer. We document racial gaps in test-taking rates, test scores, GPAs, preferences for the most selective school, and ultimate admission rates to all three schools. These gaps persist even among students with similarly high baseline achievement as measured by the state's mandatory standardized test. Substantial numbers of high-achieving Black and Hispanic students do not apply to the exam schools and to the most selective school in particular. The choice of standardized test used to measure academic merit strongly affects who is admitted.","PeriodicalId":46870,"journal":{"name":"Education Finance and Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"408-431"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Finance and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00343","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The impact of admissions process design on the racial diversity of schools and colleges has sparked heated debates. We study the pipeline into Boston's three public exam schools to understand racial gaps in enrollment. Admission to these schools has historically been based on a combination of grade point average (GPA) and a score on an optional test from a private developer. We document racial gaps in test-taking rates, test scores, GPAs, preferences for the most selective school, and ultimate admission rates to all three schools. These gaps persist even among students with similarly high baseline achievement as measured by the state's mandatory standardized test. Substantial numbers of high-achieving Black and Hispanic students do not apply to the exam schools and to the most selective school in particular. The choice of standardized test used to measure academic merit strongly affects who is admitted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族多样性与成绩衡量:来自波士顿考试学校招生的证据
摘要招生程序设计对学校和大学种族多样性的影响引发了激烈的争论。我们研究了波士顿三所公立考试学校的招生渠道,以了解招生中的种族差距。从历史上看,这些学校的录取是基于平均绩点(GPA)和私人开发商的可选考试分数的组合。我们记录了在考试率、考试成绩、GPA、对最具选择性的学校的偏好以及所有三所学校的最终录取率方面的种族差距。即使在根据该州强制性标准化考试衡量的基线成绩同样高的学生中,这些差距仍然存在。大量成绩优异的黑人和西班牙裔学生没有申请考试学校,尤其是最挑剔的学校。用于衡量学术成绩的标准化考试的选择对录取者有很大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Making the (Letter) Grade: The Incentive Effects of Mandatory Pass/Fail Courses How Well Do Professional Reference Ratings Predict Teacher Performance? The Academic and Behavioral Impacts of an Autism Health Insurance Mandate: Evidence from Massachusetts A Bridge to Graduation: Post-Secondary Effects of an Alternative Pathway for Students Who Fail High School Exit Exams At What Cost? Is Technical Education Worth the Investment?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1