Impacts and implications of English as the corporate official language policy: A case in Japan

IF 0.8 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of English as a Lingua Franca Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.1515/jelf-2020-2035
Ujiie 氏家 Ozawa 小澤 Saeko 佐江子
{"title":"Impacts and implications of English as the corporate official language policy: A case in Japan","authors":"Ujiie 氏家 Ozawa 小澤 Saeko 佐江子","doi":"10.1515/jelf-2020-2035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Increasing numbers of corporations are now operating across national borders as a result of globalization. The “language barrier” is the first and foremost challenge they encounter when starting a business in a foreign market, and many companies are trying to solve the problem by adopting a common corporate language. Using English as an official corporate language is the most common solution for those corporations. The present study explored the impacts of English as a corporate official language policy implemented at a company, a rapidly developed high profile IT Company with 20,000 employees, in Japan, a country often perceived to be relatively monolingual and monocultural. When I started studying the company, I first found that the company’s motive to use English as the official corporate language was different from other instances of corporate language policy making I had come across. In previous studies (e.g., Feely & Harzing 2003; Marschan-Piekkari, Welch, & Welch 1999), the companies implemented common corporate language to solve problems caused by language barriers between employees with diverse linguistic backgrounds. However, the company in this study implemented the corporate language policy to prepare for globalization and recruit talents globally. When the company introduced the English-only language policy, most of the employees of the company were Japanese. Therefore, at the time of implementing the language policy, there was no compelling reason for them to use English. The language policy did not work effectively except for a few departments with non-Japanese employees who spoke different first languages. English functioned as a lingua franca in those departments with multinational employees. The findings indicate that for NNESs (non-native English speakers) to communicate with each other in English, the environment has to be more multilingual, less dominated by a single first language. Although almost all Japanese citizens are required to take intensive English courses in compulsory schoolings, the average level of English proficiency is considered to be relatively low in the advanced economies. The present study indicates that it is not for linguistic competence but a lack of interaction with other ELF speakers. Therefore, for learners of ELF in an intensely monolingual society such as Japan to become competent communicators in ELF, providing multilingual learning environments would be more effective than the prevailing teaching practices of classroom learning in L1 Japanese speaker only environments.","PeriodicalId":44449,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English as a Lingua Franca","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jelf-2020-2035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English as a Lingua Franca","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2020-2035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Increasing numbers of corporations are now operating across national borders as a result of globalization. The “language barrier” is the first and foremost challenge they encounter when starting a business in a foreign market, and many companies are trying to solve the problem by adopting a common corporate language. Using English as an official corporate language is the most common solution for those corporations. The present study explored the impacts of English as a corporate official language policy implemented at a company, a rapidly developed high profile IT Company with 20,000 employees, in Japan, a country often perceived to be relatively monolingual and monocultural. When I started studying the company, I first found that the company’s motive to use English as the official corporate language was different from other instances of corporate language policy making I had come across. In previous studies (e.g., Feely & Harzing 2003; Marschan-Piekkari, Welch, & Welch 1999), the companies implemented common corporate language to solve problems caused by language barriers between employees with diverse linguistic backgrounds. However, the company in this study implemented the corporate language policy to prepare for globalization and recruit talents globally. When the company introduced the English-only language policy, most of the employees of the company were Japanese. Therefore, at the time of implementing the language policy, there was no compelling reason for them to use English. The language policy did not work effectively except for a few departments with non-Japanese employees who spoke different first languages. English functioned as a lingua franca in those departments with multinational employees. The findings indicate that for NNESs (non-native English speakers) to communicate with each other in English, the environment has to be more multilingual, less dominated by a single first language. Although almost all Japanese citizens are required to take intensive English courses in compulsory schoolings, the average level of English proficiency is considered to be relatively low in the advanced economies. The present study indicates that it is not for linguistic competence but a lack of interaction with other ELF speakers. Therefore, for learners of ELF in an intensely monolingual society such as Japan to become competent communicators in ELF, providing multilingual learning environments would be more effective than the prevailing teaching practices of classroom learning in L1 Japanese speaker only environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语作为企业官方语言政策的影响与启示:以日本为例
随着全球化的发展,越来越多的公司跨越国界开展业务。“语言障碍”是他们在国外市场创业时遇到的首要挑战,许多公司都试图通过采用通用的公司语言来解决这个问题。使用英语作为官方公司语言是这些公司最常见的解决方案。本研究探讨了英语作为公司官方语言政策在一家公司实施的影响,该公司是一家拥有20,000名员工的快速发展的知名IT公司,在日本,一个通常被认为是相对单一语言和单一文化的国家。当我开始研究这家公司时,我首先发现,这家公司使用英语作为官方公司语言的动机与我遇到的其他公司语言政策制定的例子不同。在之前的研究中(例如,Feely & Harzing 2003;Marschan-Piekkari, Welch, & Welch 1999),公司采用通用的企业语言来解决不同语言背景的员工之间的语言障碍问题。然而,本研究中的公司实施了公司语言政策,为全球化做准备,在全球范围内招聘人才。该公司在实行只使用英语的政策时,大部分员工是日本人。因此,在实施语言政策时,没有令人信服的理由让他们使用英语。除了少数部门的非日本籍员工说不同的第一语言外,语言政策并没有有效地发挥作用。在那些有跨国雇员的部门,英语起着通用语的作用。研究结果表明,对于非英语母语者来说,要用英语相互交流,环境必须是多语言的,而不是单一第一语言的主导。尽管几乎所有日本公民都被要求在义务教育阶段接受英语强化课程,但在发达经济体中,日本人的平均英语水平被认为相对较低。目前的研究表明,这与语言能力无关,而是与其他说ELF的人缺乏互动。因此,对于像日本这样一个强烈的单语社会中的ELF学习者来说,提供多语言学习环境将比在母语日语环境中进行课堂学习的主流教学实践更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of English as a Lingua Franca (JELF) is the first journal to be devoted to the rapidly-growing phenomenon of English as a Lingua Franca. The articles and other features explore this global phenomenon from a wide number of perspectives, including linguistic, sociolinguistic, socio-psychological, and political, in a diverse range of settings where English is the common language of choice.
期刊最新文献
Linguistic justice in English-medium instruction contexts: a theoretical argument EMI programmes in Vietnamese higher education: a case study of translanguaging practices for inclusive education English Medium Instruction or Exploitative Models of Income? International students’ experiences of EMI by default at an Australian university Our gateway is your gatekeeper: benefits and constraints of EMI for different participants in Japanese ELF contexts Enhancing equity in South Korean EMI higher education through translanguaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1