A consensus-based Fermatean fuzzy WASPAS methodology for selection of healthcare waste treatment technology selection

Chandana Narasimha Rao, Matta Sujatha
{"title":"A consensus-based Fermatean fuzzy WASPAS methodology for selection of healthcare waste treatment technology selection","authors":"Chandana Narasimha Rao, Matta Sujatha","doi":"10.31181/dmame622023621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Healthcare waste (HCW) management is a complex issue influenced by many factors, including technological, economic, environmental, and social factors. It is possible to regard the evaluation of the best treatment technique for HCW management as a challenging case of MCDM (multi-criteria decision-making), where various alternatives and evaluation criteria must be considered. The presentation and handling of the shaky data are crucial to choosing the HCW treatment technology. In order to address the issue of MCDM issues with Fermatean fuzzy (FF) data, we first build a consensus-based WASPAS approach in this study. In the suggested integrated methodology, the rank of the alternatives is determined using the WASPAS method in an FF environment, and the attribute weights are estimated using the entropy measure technique. In the preceding, an HCW treatment technology assessment issue is considered to make the proposed structure's applicability more transparent. In this study, four HCW treatment methods—chemical disinfection, microwave disinfection, cremation, and autoclaving—are considered options. According to the study's findings, autoclaving is the most effective HCW treatment method. Additionally, we demonstrate a sensitivity assessment using several criteria weight sets to test the stability of our intriguing proposed approach. We also call attention to a contrast between our suggested approach to decision-making and the practices now in use.","PeriodicalId":32695,"journal":{"name":"Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame622023621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Healthcare waste (HCW) management is a complex issue influenced by many factors, including technological, economic, environmental, and social factors. It is possible to regard the evaluation of the best treatment technique for HCW management as a challenging case of MCDM (multi-criteria decision-making), where various alternatives and evaluation criteria must be considered. The presentation and handling of the shaky data are crucial to choosing the HCW treatment technology. In order to address the issue of MCDM issues with Fermatean fuzzy (FF) data, we first build a consensus-based WASPAS approach in this study. In the suggested integrated methodology, the rank of the alternatives is determined using the WASPAS method in an FF environment, and the attribute weights are estimated using the entropy measure technique. In the preceding, an HCW treatment technology assessment issue is considered to make the proposed structure's applicability more transparent. In this study, four HCW treatment methods—chemical disinfection, microwave disinfection, cremation, and autoclaving—are considered options. According to the study's findings, autoclaving is the most effective HCW treatment method. Additionally, we demonstrate a sensitivity assessment using several criteria weight sets to test the stability of our intriguing proposed approach. We also call attention to a contrast between our suggested approach to decision-making and the practices now in use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于共识的Fermatean模糊WASPAS方法在医疗废弃物处理技术选择中的应用
医疗废物管理是一个复杂的问题,受到许多因素的影响,包括技术、经济、环境和社会因素。可以将HCW管理最佳治疗技术的评估视为MCDM(多标准决策)的一个具有挑战性的案例,其中必须考虑各种替代方案和评估标准。不稳定数据的呈现和处理对于选择HCW处理技术至关重要。为了解决Fermatean模糊(FF)数据的MCDM问题,我们在本研究中首先建立了一种基于共识的WASPAS方法。在建议的综合方法中,在FF环境中使用WASPAS方法确定备选方案的等级,并使用熵测量技术估计属性权重。在上文中,考虑了HCW处理技术评估问题,以使拟议结构的适用性更加透明。在这项研究中,四种HCW处理方法——化学消毒、微波消毒、火化和高压灭菌——被认为是可选的。根据研究结果,高压灭菌是最有效的HCW处理方法。此外,我们使用几个标准权重集进行了敏感性评估,以测试我们提出的有趣方法的稳定性。我们还提请注意我们建议的决策方法与目前使用的做法之间的对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering
Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering Decision Sciences-General Decision Sciences
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
A hybrid method for occupations selection in the bio-circular-green economy project of the national housing authority in Thailand Random centroid initialization for improving centroid-based clustering Evaluating and Ranking Metaverse Platforms Using Intuitionistic Trapezoidal Fuzzy VIKOR MCDM: Incorporating Score and Accuracy Functions for Comprehensive Assessment The New Measures of Lorenz Curve Asymmetry: Formulation and Hypothesis Testing Business Process Redesign: A Systematic Review of Evaluation Approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1