Board diversity and financial performance: empirical evidence from the United Kingdom

IF 2.4 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting Research Journal Pub Date : 2021-12-24 DOI:10.1108/arj-02-2020-0037
Khaled Hosny, Adel Elgharbawy
{"title":"Board diversity and financial performance: empirical evidence from the United Kingdom","authors":"Khaled Hosny, Adel Elgharbawy","doi":"10.1108/arj-02-2020-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to investigate the relationship between board diversity and financial performance from a wide perspective, including multiple dimensions of board diversity. Design/methodology/approach The cross-sectional design of the FTSE 350 companies in the period of 2013–2019 was adopted in this study. Data were collected using the Thomson Reuters Eikon and BoardEx databases and analyzed via ordinary least Squares (OLS) regression. Findings Both gender and skill diversity positively affect financial performance. However, other dimensions of diversity, including board tenure, education and network, have no significant influence on financial performance. On the other hand, nationality diversity negatively affects financial performance, and the gender diversity of executive directors negatively affects market-based performance. The results remain unchanged after considering endogeneity concerns and using alternative measures of financial performance. Practical implications This study provides useful insights into the importance of board diversity and its implications for firm performance, which can help in the development of future regulations and policies, such as female representation on the board. The findings can also guide companies toward the best way of diversifying their boardrooms in different aspects. Originality/value This study extensively investigates board diversity, including gender, tenure, skill and education, network and nationality, using the lens of the resource dependency theory. It also extends the scope of the study to examine some characteristics of executive directors, including gender and age. The evidence is provided from one of the leading countries in regulating corporate governance (CG), i.e. the UK.","PeriodicalId":45591,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Research Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arj-02-2020-0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the relationship between board diversity and financial performance from a wide perspective, including multiple dimensions of board diversity. Design/methodology/approach The cross-sectional design of the FTSE 350 companies in the period of 2013–2019 was adopted in this study. Data were collected using the Thomson Reuters Eikon and BoardEx databases and analyzed via ordinary least Squares (OLS) regression. Findings Both gender and skill diversity positively affect financial performance. However, other dimensions of diversity, including board tenure, education and network, have no significant influence on financial performance. On the other hand, nationality diversity negatively affects financial performance, and the gender diversity of executive directors negatively affects market-based performance. The results remain unchanged after considering endogeneity concerns and using alternative measures of financial performance. Practical implications This study provides useful insights into the importance of board diversity and its implications for firm performance, which can help in the development of future regulations and policies, such as female representation on the board. The findings can also guide companies toward the best way of diversifying their boardrooms in different aspects. Originality/value This study extensively investigates board diversity, including gender, tenure, skill and education, network and nationality, using the lens of the resource dependency theory. It also extends the scope of the study to examine some characteristics of executive directors, including gender and age. The evidence is provided from one of the leading countries in regulating corporate governance (CG), i.e. the UK.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
董事会多样性与财务业绩:来自英国的经验证据
目的本研究旨在从广泛的角度研究董事会多样性与财务绩效之间的关系,包括董事会多元化的多个维度。设计/方法/方法本研究采用了2013年至2019年期间富时350指数成分股公司的横断面设计。使用汤森路透Eikon和BoardEx数据库收集数据,并通过普通最小二乘(OLS)回归进行分析。发现性别和技能多样性都会对财务绩效产生积极影响。然而,多样性的其他方面,包括董事会任期、教育和网络,对财务业绩没有显著影响。另一方面,国籍多样性对财务业绩产生负面影响,执行董事的性别多样性对市场业绩产生负面作用。在考虑内生性问题并使用财务业绩的替代衡量标准后,结果保持不变。实际含义这项研究为董事会多样性的重要性及其对公司业绩的影响提供了有用的见解,这有助于制定未来的法规和政策,例如女性在董事会中的代表性。研究结果还可以指导公司在不同方面实现董事会多元化的最佳方式。独创性/价值本研究利用资源依赖理论的视角,广泛调查了董事会的多样性,包括性别、任期、技能和教育、网络和国籍。它还扩大了研究范围,考察了执行董事的一些特征,包括性别和年龄。证据来自监管公司治理的领先国家之一,即英国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting Research Journal
Accounting Research Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
The role of other comprehensive income in analyst valuation: profitability, perception and performance Does aural accounting improve the stakeholder relationship capability? Factors influencing readiness to implement digital audit among internal auditors of the Malaysian public sector Does a CEO from a reputable university create a better working environment? Evidence from Indonesia IFRS-9, expected loan loss provisioning and bank liquidity creation: early evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1