The Attractiveness Advantage At Work: A Cross-Disciplinary Integrative Review

IF 14.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Academy of Management Annals Pub Date : 2020-08-10 DOI:10.5465/annals.2018.0134
Kelly A. Nault, Marko Pitesa, Stefan Thau
{"title":"The Attractiveness Advantage At Work: A Cross-Disciplinary Integrative Review","authors":"Kelly A. Nault, Marko Pitesa, Stefan Thau","doi":"10.5465/annals.2018.0134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compared with people of average attractiveness, the highly attractive earn roughly 20 percent more and are recommended for promotion more frequently. The dominant view of this “attractiveness advan...","PeriodicalId":48333,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Annals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5465/annals.2018.0134","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Annals","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0134","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Compared with people of average attractiveness, the highly attractive earn roughly 20 percent more and are recommended for promotion more frequently. The dominant view of this “attractiveness advan...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作中的吸引力优势:一个跨学科的综合评价
与一般吸引力的人相比,高吸引力的人的收入大约高出20%,并且被推荐升职的频率更高。这种“吸引力优势”的主流观点。。。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
36.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The mission of the Academy of Management Annals (Annals) is to publish up-to-date, in-depth and integrative reviews of research advances in management. Often called "reviews with an attitude," Annals papers summarize and/or challenge established assumptions and concepts, pinpoint problems and factual errors, inspire discussions, and illuminate possible avenues for further study. Reviews published in Annals move above and beyond descriptions of the field–they motivate conceptual integration and set agendas for future research.
期刊最新文献
Categorizing Concepts and Phenomena in Management Research: A Four-Phase Integrative Review and Recommendations Standardization: Research Trends, Current Debates, and Interdisciplinarity Purpose in Management Research: Navigating a Complex and Fragmented Area of Study Heuristics in Organizations: Toward an Integrative Process Model Understanding How People React to Change: A Domain of Uncertainty Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1