Van typiste naar ingenieur?

IF 0.6 Q3 LINGUISTICS Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics Pub Date : 2019-12-31 DOI:10.1075/DUJAL.18014.KOS
Dietha Koster, Chiara Iding
{"title":"Van typiste naar ingenieur?","authors":"Dietha Koster, Chiara Iding","doi":"10.1075/DUJAL.18014.KOS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nStudies on English language learning materials indicate that women are underrepresented and often appear in low-status professions, though gender equality increases within the last decade (Sunderland, 2015). To what degree does this finding apply for textbooks for learners of Dutch as a Second Language (DSL)? To our knowledge, there are no studies into gender and profession in DSL materials. Dutch however, constitutes an interesting case as both female, male and ‘gender neutral’ professional role nouns exist, while their use is not formally regulated. We systematically analyzed textual and pictorial representations of female and male professionals in textbook chapters about work in fifteen DSL textbooks published within the last 50 years. We drew on quantitative (e.g., number of fe/male and ‘gender neutral’ professional names; instances of male generics and firstness; number of depicted wo/men) and qualitative (e.g., nature of the most frequent professional names; categorization of textbook images) methods to do so. Results show that women are not underrepresented in dialogues and pictures, but that dialogue themes are unequally divided over women and men. Moreover, women are backgrounded through male generics and male firstness and female professional names appear less frequently than male names. Women are also described in gender typical roles, whereas men are not. This holds for both older (1974–2009) and recent textbooks (2011–2017). Overall, more ‘gender neutral’ nouns refer to men in the corpus, but they are used more frequently to refer to women within the last decade. Future studies should address the present theme from psycholinguistic and classroom discourse perspectives and consider additional analytical domains (e.g. chapters about family) and foci (e.g. analyses of verbs associated with wo/men). We discuss pedagogical implications (e.g., screen materials for male firstness; describe women in a greater variety of roles; reverse gender roles in class) for those with concern for gender equality in language education.","PeriodicalId":42420,"journal":{"name":"Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/DUJAL.18014.KOS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Studies on English language learning materials indicate that women are underrepresented and often appear in low-status professions, though gender equality increases within the last decade (Sunderland, 2015). To what degree does this finding apply for textbooks for learners of Dutch as a Second Language (DSL)? To our knowledge, there are no studies into gender and profession in DSL materials. Dutch however, constitutes an interesting case as both female, male and ‘gender neutral’ professional role nouns exist, while their use is not formally regulated. We systematically analyzed textual and pictorial representations of female and male professionals in textbook chapters about work in fifteen DSL textbooks published within the last 50 years. We drew on quantitative (e.g., number of fe/male and ‘gender neutral’ professional names; instances of male generics and firstness; number of depicted wo/men) and qualitative (e.g., nature of the most frequent professional names; categorization of textbook images) methods to do so. Results show that women are not underrepresented in dialogues and pictures, but that dialogue themes are unequally divided over women and men. Moreover, women are backgrounded through male generics and male firstness and female professional names appear less frequently than male names. Women are also described in gender typical roles, whereas men are not. This holds for both older (1974–2009) and recent textbooks (2011–2017). Overall, more ‘gender neutral’ nouns refer to men in the corpus, but they are used more frequently to refer to women within the last decade. Future studies should address the present theme from psycholinguistic and classroom discourse perspectives and consider additional analytical domains (e.g. chapters about family) and foci (e.g. analyses of verbs associated with wo/men). We discuss pedagogical implications (e.g., screen materials for male firstness; describe women in a greater variety of roles; reverse gender roles in class) for those with concern for gender equality in language education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从打字员到工程师?
对英语学习材料的研究表明,尽管性别平等在过去十年中有所增加,但女性的代表性不足,而且经常出现在地位较低的职业中(桑德兰,2015)。这一发现在多大程度上适用于荷兰语作为第二语言(DSL)学习者的教科书?据我们所知,DSL材料中没有关于性别和职业的研究。然而,荷兰语构成了一个有趣的例子,因为女性、男性和“中性”专业角色名词都存在,而它们的使用没有受到正式规范。我们系统地分析了过去50年内出版的15本DSL教科书中关于工作的教科书章节中女性和男性专业人员的文本和图像表现。我们采用了定量(例如,女性/男性和“中性”专业名称的数量;男性通用性和第一性的实例;描绘的女性/男性的数量)和定性(例如,最常见专业名称的性质;教科书图像的分类)方法来做这件事。结果表明,女性在对话和图片中的代表性并不低,但这种对话的主题在男女之间存在着不平等的分歧。此外,女性的背景是男性的通用性和男性的第一性,女性的专业名称出现的频率低于男性。女性也被描述为典型的性别角色,而男性则不然。这适用于旧的(1974–2009)和新的教科书(2011–2017)。总体而言,语料库中更多的“中性”名词指代男性,但在过去十年中,它们更频繁地用于指代女性。未来的研究应该从心理语言学和课堂话语的角度来处理当前的主题,并考虑额外的分析领域(例如关于家庭的章节)和焦点(例如与wo/man相关的动词分析)。我们讨论了对那些关心语言教育中性别平等的人的教育意义(例如,筛选男性第一的材料;描述女性扮演更多不同角色;在课堂上逆转性别角色)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics (DuJAL) focuses on promoting Dutch and Belgian work in applied linguistics among an international audience, but also welcomes contributions from other countries. It caters for both the academic society in the field and for language and communication experts working in other contexts, such as institutions involved in language policy, teacher training, curriculum development, assessment, and educational and communication consultancy. DuJAL is the digital continuation of Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, which had been the journal of Anéla, the Dutch Association of Applied Linguistics, for forty years. Like its predecessor, DuJAL wants to offer a platform to young researchers in applied linguistics, i.e. PhD candidates and MA students. In order to maintain a high standard all submissions are subjected to a ‘double blind’ review by at least one external reviewer and two of the editors. Contributions may be written in Dutch, English, German or French.
期刊最新文献
Teaching text structure in science education Examining accent bias towards Turkish speakers of Dutch Addressing the student Miss Belgium, Coca-Cola and Flemish carwashes Better catch them young, but how?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1