{"title":"Affirmatives in Early Modern English","authors":"Jonathan Culpeper","doi":"10.1075/JHP.00021.CUL","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study examines the affirmatives yes, yea and ay in Early Modern English,\n more specifically in the period 1560 to 1760. Affirmatives have an obvious role as responses to yes/no questions in dialogues, and\n so this study demanded the kind of dialogical material provided by the Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760. I\n examine the meanings and contexts of usage of each affirmative: their distribution across time and text-types, their collocates\n and their occurrence after positive and negative questions. The results challenge a number of issues and claims in the literature,\n including when the “Germanic pattern” (involving yes and yea after positive or negative\n questions) dissolved, whether yea or ay were dialectal, and the timing of the rise of\n ay and the fall of yea.","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/JHP.00021.CUL","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JHP.00021.CUL","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This study examines the affirmatives yes, yea and ay in Early Modern English,
more specifically in the period 1560 to 1760. Affirmatives have an obvious role as responses to yes/no questions in dialogues, and
so this study demanded the kind of dialogical material provided by the Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760. I
examine the meanings and contexts of usage of each affirmative: their distribution across time and text-types, their collocates
and their occurrence after positive and negative questions. The results challenge a number of issues and claims in the literature,
including when the “Germanic pattern” (involving yes and yea after positive or negative
questions) dissolved, whether yea or ay were dialectal, and the timing of the rise of
ay and the fall of yea.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.