Individual Time Preferences for Well-Being Allocation between Present and Future Generations

IF 0.6 Q2 AREA STUDIES Mir Rossii-Universe of Russia Pub Date : 2023-03-23 DOI:10.17323/1811-038x-2023-32-2-164-187
Владимир Владимирович Карачаровский
{"title":"Individual Time Preferences for Well-Being Allocation between Present and Future Generations","authors":"Владимир Владимирович Карачаровский","doi":"10.17323/1811-038x-2023-32-2-164-187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the utopian nature of the socialist societies of the 20th century, the public legitimacy of temporarily sacrificing current prosperity for the sake of a better future remains a notable characteristic of a society’s potential for modernization. This study focuses on measuring individual discount rates for the reallocation of two experimental types of non-market merit goods in favor of future generations—“saved lives” and “healthy and prosperous life-years”. In the case of “saved lives”, the experimental situation inherits the logic of similar foreign research, while in the case of “healthy and prosperous life-years” the experimental situation departs from the theoretical foundations of similar foreign approaches, which use the category of “healthy and prosperous life-years” to solve problems in the field of healthcare economics. In our case, the experimental situation gives data about individual political and economic decisions of the price at which additional current well-being might be allocated for the sake of the future generations. In particular, it provides an analysis of intertemporal choice when respondents vote for one of two programs: the first, with a rentier effect, provides society with the above-mentioned goods immediately, but does not impact the well-being of future generations, while the second requires a rejection of additional prosperity in the present and postpones access to those goods for several decades, but eventually allows the society to receive the goods in larger amounts or for a longer period of time. It is shown that the discount rates for “saved lives” in Russia are higher than for Europe and the US in similar experiments and amount to 20.4% and 11.8% for time periods of 25 and 50 years, respectively. Discount rates were calculated for “healthy and prosperous life-years” (6.1% and 3.9% for the same time periods). It is also shown that the share of respondents who prefer present-oriented programs (the distribution of benefits in favor of those living today) for Russia exceeds 75%. The main motives of this orientation towards the redistribution of benefits in favor of the present, rather than future generations, are identified, among which the main ones are the current standard of living, the limited forecast horizon, the principle of generational self-responsibility, the scientific and technological revolution factor, and the “time loop” factor.","PeriodicalId":42465,"journal":{"name":"Mir Rossii-Universe of Russia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mir Rossii-Universe of Russia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038x-2023-32-2-164-187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the utopian nature of the socialist societies of the 20th century, the public legitimacy of temporarily sacrificing current prosperity for the sake of a better future remains a notable characteristic of a society’s potential for modernization. This study focuses on measuring individual discount rates for the reallocation of two experimental types of non-market merit goods in favor of future generations—“saved lives” and “healthy and prosperous life-years”. In the case of “saved lives”, the experimental situation inherits the logic of similar foreign research, while in the case of “healthy and prosperous life-years” the experimental situation departs from the theoretical foundations of similar foreign approaches, which use the category of “healthy and prosperous life-years” to solve problems in the field of healthcare economics. In our case, the experimental situation gives data about individual political and economic decisions of the price at which additional current well-being might be allocated for the sake of the future generations. In particular, it provides an analysis of intertemporal choice when respondents vote for one of two programs: the first, with a rentier effect, provides society with the above-mentioned goods immediately, but does not impact the well-being of future generations, while the second requires a rejection of additional prosperity in the present and postpones access to those goods for several decades, but eventually allows the society to receive the goods in larger amounts or for a longer period of time. It is shown that the discount rates for “saved lives” in Russia are higher than for Europe and the US in similar experiments and amount to 20.4% and 11.8% for time periods of 25 and 50 years, respectively. Discount rates were calculated for “healthy and prosperous life-years” (6.1% and 3.9% for the same time periods). It is also shown that the share of respondents who prefer present-oriented programs (the distribution of benefits in favor of those living today) for Russia exceeds 75%. The main motives of this orientation towards the redistribution of benefits in favor of the present, rather than future generations, are identified, among which the main ones are the current standard of living, the limited forecast horizon, the principle of generational self-responsibility, the scientific and technological revolution factor, and the “time loop” factor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
今世后代幸福分配的个体时间偏好
尽管20世纪的社会主义社会具有乌托邦性质,但为了更美好的未来而暂时牺牲当前繁荣的公共合法性仍然是一个社会现代化潜力的一个显著特征。这项研究的重点是衡量两种非市场价值商品的重新分配的个人贴现率,这两种商品有利于子孙后代——“拯救的生命”和“健康繁荣的生命年”。在“拯救生命”的情况下,实验情况继承了国外类似研究的逻辑,而在“健康和富裕的生命年”的情况中,实验情况偏离了国外类似方法的理论基础,这些方法使用“健康和繁荣的生命年数”的类别来解决医疗经济学领域的问题。在我们的案例中,实验情况提供了有关个人政治和经济决策的数据,这些决策的代价是为了子孙后代而分配额外的当前福利。特别是,当受访者投票支持两个项目中的一个时,它提供了对跨期选择的分析:第一个项目具有租房者效应,立即为社会提供上述商品,但不会影响后代的福祉,而第二个项目要求拒绝当前的额外繁荣,并将获得这些商品的时间推迟几十年,但最终允许社会接收更大数量或更长时间的商品。研究表明,在类似的实验中,俄罗斯“拯救生命”的贴现率高于欧洲和美国,在25年和50年的时间段内分别为20.4%和11.8%。贴现率是为“健康和富裕的生活年”计算的(同期分别为6.1%和3.9%)。研究还表明,在俄罗斯,更喜欢以当下为导向的计划(有利于当今生活的人的福利分配)的受访者比例超过75%。确定了这种有利于当代而非子孙后代的利益再分配取向的主要动机,其中主要动机是当前的生活水平、有限的预测范围、世代自我责任原则、科学技术革命因素和“时间循环”因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Специфика мировоззрения сторонников западного пути развития для России в массовых слоях населения Факторы развития негосударственного сектора социальных услуг в российских регионах Высшее образование в России: элитное vs элитарное? Динамика жизнедеятельности и факторы благополучия подростков Компенсаторная функция религиозных институтов в институциональной матрице общества
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1