Pitfall to Peace: FARC’s Political Participation and Mass Support for Peace Talks in Colombia

IF 1.6 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Politics in Latin America Pub Date : 2020-11-26 DOI:10.1177/1866802X20965585
Ryan E. Carlin, Gregory J. Love, J. Mccoy, Jelena Subotić
{"title":"Pitfall to Peace: FARC’s Political Participation and Mass Support for Peace Talks in Colombia","authors":"Ryan E. Carlin, Gregory J. Love, J. Mccoy, Jelena Subotić","doi":"10.1177/1866802X20965585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transforming armed groups into legitimate political actors is often considered an ideal way to settle armed internal conflicts. In democracies, the efficacy of such approaches depends on the public legitimacy that the citizenry grants them. How does the prospect of Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia’s (FARC’s) political participation influence citizens’ support for the peace process? This study addresses this question by triangulating evidence from three separate studies: (1) regression analysis using face-to-face nationally representative survey data, as well as (2) a vignette experiment and (3) a conjoint analysis, both conducted online with national samples of Colombians. Though methodologically distinct, each analysis converges on a singular conclusion: mass support for the integration of ex-FARC guerrillas into democratic politics damaged support for negotiated peace, often to similar or greater degrees than mass support for transitional justice mechanisms. We suspect this reflects citizens’ fear of undermining democratic representation, the legitimacy of democratic institutions, and electoral integrity.","PeriodicalId":44885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Politics in Latin America","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1866802X20965585","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Politics in Latin America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X20965585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transforming armed groups into legitimate political actors is often considered an ideal way to settle armed internal conflicts. In democracies, the efficacy of such approaches depends on the public legitimacy that the citizenry grants them. How does the prospect of Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia’s (FARC’s) political participation influence citizens’ support for the peace process? This study addresses this question by triangulating evidence from three separate studies: (1) regression analysis using face-to-face nationally representative survey data, as well as (2) a vignette experiment and (3) a conjoint analysis, both conducted online with national samples of Colombians. Though methodologically distinct, each analysis converges on a singular conclusion: mass support for the integration of ex-FARC guerrillas into democratic politics damaged support for negotiated peace, often to similar or greater degrees than mass support for transitional justice mechanisms. We suspect this reflects citizens’ fear of undermining democratic representation, the legitimacy of democratic institutions, and electoral integrity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
和平的陷阱:哥伦比亚革命武装力量的政治参与和对和平谈判的大规模支持
将武装团体转变为合法的政治行动者通常被认为是解决国内武装冲突的理想方式。在民主国家,这种方法的有效性取决于公民赋予它们的公共合法性。哥伦比亚革命武装力量(FARC)政治参与的前景如何影响公民对和平进程的支持?这项研究通过对三项独立研究的证据进行三角分析来解决这个问题:(1)使用面对面全国代表性调查数据的回归分析,以及(2)小插曲实验和(3)联合分析,这两项研究都是在网上对哥伦比亚人的全国样本进行的。尽管在方法上有所不同,但每一项分析都得出了一个独特的结论:对前哥伦比亚革命武装力量游击队融入民主政治的大规模支持损害了对谈判和平的支持,其程度往往与对过渡司法机制的大规模支持相似或更大。我们怀疑这反映了公民对破坏民主代表性、民主制度合法性和选举完整性的恐惧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Why Are Constitutional Amendments in Mexico so Frequent? Assessing Electoral Personalism in Latin American Presidential Elections Where did Hyper-Presidentialism Go? The Origin of Bills and Laws Passed in Chile, 1990–2022 Assessing the Relationship Between Compulsory Voting and Over-Representation of Extreme Parties Do Disciplinary Sanctions Affect Political Parties’ Re-election? Evidence from Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1