Fuzzy Logic-Based Analytic Hierarchy Process and Principal Component Analyses for Optimal Surface Mining Techniques

E. Gomaa, K. El-Nagdy, A. Arafat
{"title":"Fuzzy Logic-Based Analytic Hierarchy Process and Principal Component Analyses for Optimal Surface Mining Techniques","authors":"E. Gomaa, K. El-Nagdy, A. Arafat","doi":"10.21608/jpme.2021.98758.1097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, seven production methods including drilling and blasting are evaluated concerning technical, environmental, and economical aspects. These production techniques are wheel excavator, hydraulic excavator, surface miner, hydraulic hammer, bulldozer, and face miner. This study is carried out to find the best technique, that may alternate to the classical drilling and blasting method. However, the use of such classical production method may be the only option for some quarry operators. Various comparison aspects are investigated concerning the welfares of these systems, the relation between the potential improvement of the ecological effects on the one hand and the technological potential, and the costs on the other. Two different statistical analyses that are the Fuzzy Method Analyses Hierarchical Process (AHP) and Principal Component Analyses (PCA) are applied in this assessment. The final evaluation of the two mathematical models is matched closely, and it proves that the drilling and blasting is the most efficient method then come after it bucket wheel excavator, hydraulic excavator, surface miner, hydraulic hammer, bulldozer, and face miner, respectively. The range of competency among these techniques regarded to drilling and blasting efficiency is ranged from 78.5% to 20%.","PeriodicalId":34437,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jpme.2021.98758.1097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, seven production methods including drilling and blasting are evaluated concerning technical, environmental, and economical aspects. These production techniques are wheel excavator, hydraulic excavator, surface miner, hydraulic hammer, bulldozer, and face miner. This study is carried out to find the best technique, that may alternate to the classical drilling and blasting method. However, the use of such classical production method may be the only option for some quarry operators. Various comparison aspects are investigated concerning the welfares of these systems, the relation between the potential improvement of the ecological effects on the one hand and the technological potential, and the costs on the other. Two different statistical analyses that are the Fuzzy Method Analyses Hierarchical Process (AHP) and Principal Component Analyses (PCA) are applied in this assessment. The final evaluation of the two mathematical models is matched closely, and it proves that the drilling and blasting is the most efficient method then come after it bucket wheel excavator, hydraulic excavator, surface miner, hydraulic hammer, bulldozer, and face miner, respectively. The range of competency among these techniques regarded to drilling and blasting efficiency is ranged from 78.5% to 20%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于模糊逻辑层次分析法和主成分分析法的露天采矿工艺优化
本文从技术、环境和经济等方面对钻孔和爆破等七种生产方法进行了评价。这些生产技术有轮式挖掘机、液压挖掘机、露天采矿机、液压锤、推土机和露天采矿机。本研究旨在寻找最佳技术,以替代传统的钻孔和爆破方法。然而,对于一些采石场经营者来说,使用这种经典的生产方法可能是唯一的选择。研究了这些系统的福利、生态效应的潜在改善与技术潜力之间的关系以及成本之间的各种比较方面。本次评估采用了两种不同的统计分析方法,即模糊层次分析法(AHP)和主成分分析法(PCA)。两个数学模型的最终评估结果吻合较好,证明了钻孔和爆破是继斗轮挖掘机、液压挖掘机、露天采矿机、液压锤、推土机和露天采矿机之后最有效的方法。这些技术在钻孔和爆破效率方面的能力范围从78.5%到20%不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Maximizing CO2-EOR Potential for Carbonate Reservoir, Horus Field, Western Desert, Egypt A review on the Use Nano Technology for Enhancing Compressive Strength of Cement in Oil and Gas Industry. Reducing Well Deliverability Time and Drilling Costs using Casing While Drilling Operations, West Kuwait A Comprehensive Review of Traditional, Modern and Advanced Presplit Drilling and Blasting in the Mining and Construction Industries Investigation into the Use of Thevetia Peruviana seed oil for Surfactant Flooding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1