X. Serra‐Aracil, Arturo Domínguez, L. Mora-López, Josephine Hidalgo, A. Pallisera-Lloveras, S. Serra-Pla, J. Badia-Closa, A. Garcia-Nalda, S. Navarro-Soto
{"title":"Urinary catheter in colorectal surgery. Current practices and improvements in order to allow prompt removal: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"X. Serra‐Aracil, Arturo Domínguez, L. Mora-López, Josephine Hidalgo, A. Pallisera-Lloveras, S. Serra-Pla, J. Badia-Closa, A. Garcia-Nalda, S. Navarro-Soto","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08341-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nDespite the publication of the Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS), attitudes to urinary catheter (UC) management vary widely in colorectal surgery. Objective - The aim of the present study is to define current practices in UC management in colorectal surgery.\n\n\nMETHODS\nCross-sectional observational study carried out in March-April 2019, based on the responses to a survey administered to public hospitals in Catalonia. Respondents were asked about their observance of ERAS programs, the percentage of laparoscopic procedures performed, and the time of UC withdrawal in surgery of the colon and rectum.\n\n\nRESULTS\nForty-three of 45 hospitals contacted eventually responded (95.6%). As two hospitals reported that they did not perform colorectal surgery, the study is based on the results from 41 centers. Thirty-five (85.4%) reported following ERAS programs; 30 (73.2%) have Coloproctology units, and 39 (95.1%) perform more than 70% of colorectal surgeries by laparoscopy. In colon surgery, 27 (65.9%) remove the UC at 24 h, and 12 (29.3%) on day 2 or day 3. In rectal surgery, 17 (58.6%) remove the UC on day 2-3.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nManagement of UC in colon and rectal surgery varies widely. There is clearly room for improvement in UC management, but needs to be thoroughly assessed in randomized multicenter studies.","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08341-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Despite the publication of the Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS), attitudes to urinary catheter (UC) management vary widely in colorectal surgery. Objective - The aim of the present study is to define current practices in UC management in colorectal surgery.
METHODS
Cross-sectional observational study carried out in March-April 2019, based on the responses to a survey administered to public hospitals in Catalonia. Respondents were asked about their observance of ERAS programs, the percentage of laparoscopic procedures performed, and the time of UC withdrawal in surgery of the colon and rectum.
RESULTS
Forty-three of 45 hospitals contacted eventually responded (95.6%). As two hospitals reported that they did not perform colorectal surgery, the study is based on the results from 41 centers. Thirty-five (85.4%) reported following ERAS programs; 30 (73.2%) have Coloproctology units, and 39 (95.1%) perform more than 70% of colorectal surgeries by laparoscopy. In colon surgery, 27 (65.9%) remove the UC at 24 h, and 12 (29.3%) on day 2 or day 3. In rectal surgery, 17 (58.6%) remove the UC on day 2-3.
CONCLUSIONS
Management of UC in colon and rectal surgery varies widely. There is clearly room for improvement in UC management, but needs to be thoroughly assessed in randomized multicenter studies.
期刊介绍:
Minerva Chirurgica publishes scientific papers on surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.