Analysis of width/length ratio in maxillary anterior teeth among Gujarati young individuals: A cross-sectional study

IF 0.4 Q4 BIOLOGY Advances in Human Biology Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.4103/aihb.aihb_186_22
Bhagyashree H Dave, S. Mehta, Shreyansh P. Sutaria, P. Sutariya
{"title":"Analysis of width/length ratio in maxillary anterior teeth among Gujarati young individuals: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Bhagyashree H Dave, S. Mehta, Shreyansh P. Sutaria, P. Sutariya","doi":"10.4103/aihb.aihb_186_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Correcting tooth size discrepancies are essential in achieving good dental and facial aesthetic in restorative and prosthetic dentistry. Hence, dental biometrics will be the most important key for an aesthetic restoration. This study aimed to analyse the width, length and width/length ratio related to the clinical crown of maxillary central incisors, lateral incisors and canines in adult Gujarati individuals. This study also aimed to check whether a correlation exists between the optimal tooth dimension guidelines for planning aesthetic restorations and natural tooth dimensions. Materials and Methods: Type III dental plaster casts were made from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions of 68 healthy adult participants. These casts were used to measure maxillary central incisors, lateral incisors and canines' maximum mesiodistal width and crown-root length with a digital vernier calliper (0.01 mm). The width/length ratio for each and every tooth was calculated. Results: The sample used in the study was 61.76% female and 38.24% male, with an age range of 18–30 years. 8.53 mm was the mean width value for the central incisors, lateral incisors 6.88 mm and canines 7.64 mm. The mean length was 9.80 mm for the central incisors, 8.25 mm for the lateral incisors and 9.29 mm for the canines. The average width/length ratio was 87% for the central incisors and 84% for the laterals and 83% for canines. Conclusion: The data received from the population studied are similar to previous research studies having similar methodology. However, great discrepancies in the absolute values were found when compared with other studies related to ideal tooth dimension guidelines on the aesthetic perception of dentists and personal preferences. The perception of what is considered natural seems to differ from what is considered aesthetically perfect.","PeriodicalId":7341,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Human Biology","volume":"13 1","pages":"59 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aihb.aihb_186_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Correcting tooth size discrepancies are essential in achieving good dental and facial aesthetic in restorative and prosthetic dentistry. Hence, dental biometrics will be the most important key for an aesthetic restoration. This study aimed to analyse the width, length and width/length ratio related to the clinical crown of maxillary central incisors, lateral incisors and canines in adult Gujarati individuals. This study also aimed to check whether a correlation exists between the optimal tooth dimension guidelines for planning aesthetic restorations and natural tooth dimensions. Materials and Methods: Type III dental plaster casts were made from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions of 68 healthy adult participants. These casts were used to measure maxillary central incisors, lateral incisors and canines' maximum mesiodistal width and crown-root length with a digital vernier calliper (0.01 mm). The width/length ratio for each and every tooth was calculated. Results: The sample used in the study was 61.76% female and 38.24% male, with an age range of 18–30 years. 8.53 mm was the mean width value for the central incisors, lateral incisors 6.88 mm and canines 7.64 mm. The mean length was 9.80 mm for the central incisors, 8.25 mm for the lateral incisors and 9.29 mm for the canines. The average width/length ratio was 87% for the central incisors and 84% for the laterals and 83% for canines. Conclusion: The data received from the population studied are similar to previous research studies having similar methodology. However, great discrepancies in the absolute values were found when compared with other studies related to ideal tooth dimension guidelines on the aesthetic perception of dentists and personal preferences. The perception of what is considered natural seems to differ from what is considered aesthetically perfect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古吉拉特年轻人上颌前牙宽长比的横断面分析
引言:在修复和修复牙科中,矫正牙齿大小差异对于实现良好的牙齿和面部美学至关重要。因此,牙齿生物识别技术将是美容修复最重要的关键。本研究旨在分析成年古吉拉特人上颌中切牙、侧切牙和犬齿临床牙冠的宽度、长度和宽度/长度比。本研究还旨在检查规划美观修复的最佳牙齿尺寸指南与自然牙齿尺寸之间是否存在相关性。材料和方法:用68名健康成年参与者的不可逆水胶体印模制作III型牙膏模型。这些模型用于用数字游标卡尺(0.01mm)测量上颌中切牙、侧切牙和犬齿的最大近中宽度和冠根长度。计算每个齿的宽度/长度比。结果:研究中使用的样本为61.76%的女性和38.24%的男性,年龄范围为18-30岁。中切牙、侧切牙和犬齿的平均宽度分别为8.53mm、6.88mm和7.64mm。中切牙的平均长度分别为9.80mm、8.25mm和9.29mm。中切牙的平均宽度/长度比为87%,侧切牙为84%,犬齿为83%。结论:从研究人群中获得的数据与之前采用类似方法的研究相似。然而,与其他关于牙医美感和个人偏好的理想牙齿尺寸指南的研究相比,发现绝对值存在很大差异。对什么是自然的感知似乎与什么是审美完美的感知不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rethinking the Efficacy of Natural and Synthetic Folic Acid on Human Health and Looking into a Better Alternative Effective Programmes to Reduce Inappropriate Dispensing of Antibiotics in Community Pharmacies Especially in Developing Countries Dengue Dynamics: A Global Update Evaluation of invasive tumour front in primary and secondary oral squamous cell carcinoma – A reliable prognostic parameter Study of the cellular senescence process in human umbilical cord Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1