{"title":"Application of action research practice in the out-of-hospital health management of patients with rectal cancer stoma","authors":"Yuhua Chen, Guiqing Yu, Bing Li, Zhan Song","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN115682-20190929-03534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore application values of action research practice in the out-of-hospital health management of patients with rectal cancer stoma. \n \n \nMethods \nAccording to the convenience sampling method, 46 patients with rectal cancer stoma who were admitted to Nanyang Central Hospital of Henan Province from March 2017 to March 2018 before the implementation of the action research practice were selected as the control group and 46 patients with rectal cancer stoma who were admitted from April 2018 to April 2019 after the implementation of the action research practice were selected as the observation group. The control group was given routine nursing after surgery while the observation group was given action research practice nursing after surgery. Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) , Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) , Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale (ESCA) and MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) were used before and after implementation to compare the implementation effects between the two groups. \n \n \nResults \nAfter nursing, scores of HAMA and HAMD in the observation group were respectively (15.65±10.31) points and (17.41±9.25) points, both lower than those in the control group and the differences were statistically significant (t=2.181, 2.384; P<0.05) . After nursing, the total score of ESCA of the observation group and the control group were respectively (114.96±20.45) points and (100.28±16.80) points and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.762, P<0.05) . After nursing, the overall health of SF-36 scale was (19.11.±5.08) points in the observation group and (17.11±4.12) points in the control group and the difference was statistically significant (t=2.074, P<0.05) . \n \n \nConclusions \nCarrying out action research practice for out-of-hospital health management of patients with rectal cancer stoma can alleviate negative emotions and improve self-care ability and quality of life of patients, which has relatively high clinical application value. \n \n \nKey words: \nRectal Neoplasms; Stoma; Action research practice; Health management; Anxiety; Depression; Self-care ability; Quality of life","PeriodicalId":10070,"journal":{"name":"中华现代护理杂志","volume":"26 1","pages":"1331-1335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华现代护理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN115682-20190929-03534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To explore application values of action research practice in the out-of-hospital health management of patients with rectal cancer stoma.
Methods
According to the convenience sampling method, 46 patients with rectal cancer stoma who were admitted to Nanyang Central Hospital of Henan Province from March 2017 to March 2018 before the implementation of the action research practice were selected as the control group and 46 patients with rectal cancer stoma who were admitted from April 2018 to April 2019 after the implementation of the action research practice were selected as the observation group. The control group was given routine nursing after surgery while the observation group was given action research practice nursing after surgery. Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) , Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) , Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale (ESCA) and MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) were used before and after implementation to compare the implementation effects between the two groups.
Results
After nursing, scores of HAMA and HAMD in the observation group were respectively (15.65±10.31) points and (17.41±9.25) points, both lower than those in the control group and the differences were statistically significant (t=2.181, 2.384; P<0.05) . After nursing, the total score of ESCA of the observation group and the control group were respectively (114.96±20.45) points and (100.28±16.80) points and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.762, P<0.05) . After nursing, the overall health of SF-36 scale was (19.11.±5.08) points in the observation group and (17.11±4.12) points in the control group and the difference was statistically significant (t=2.074, P<0.05) .
Conclusions
Carrying out action research practice for out-of-hospital health management of patients with rectal cancer stoma can alleviate negative emotions and improve self-care ability and quality of life of patients, which has relatively high clinical application value.
Key words:
Rectal Neoplasms; Stoma; Action research practice; Health management; Anxiety; Depression; Self-care ability; Quality of life