Ideology, Organisational Power and the Naturalisation of the Rule of the Communist Party of China

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 AREA STUDIES China-An International Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1353/chn.2023.a898338
F. Pieke
{"title":"Ideology, Organisational Power and the Naturalisation of the Rule of the Communist Party of China","authors":"F. Pieke","doi":"10.1353/chn.2023.a898338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his seminal work Ideology and Organization in Communist China, first published in 1966, Franz Schurmann presented a comprehensive sociological analysis of the Communist Party of China’s (CPC) revolutionary construction of a “New China”. In his introduction, Schurmann highlights two main points. The first is that ideology and organisation condition each other. In Schurmann’s words, organisations are “structures of differentiated roles which require the ordered exercise of power”, while ideology is a “manner of thinking characteristic of an organization”. The second and even more important point is that ideology and organisation in communist China are different from “culture”, “ethos” or “social system”, which are shorthand for how things are. Ideology and organisation, however, are action-oriented. They form a “rational instrument to do a job”, with the job being the creation of a new system and culture to replace the old ones destroyed during the revolution. During the revolution, ideology and organisation were destructive tools, breaking down the old system and elite; after the revolution, the CPC turned to the same instruments, making them into productive tools in the creation of a new society, culture and elite. Action and power are keywords in Schurmann’s work, and are drawn from an American sociological tradition inspired by Max Weber that prominently includes Talcott Parsons. Schurmann maintains that there is little sense in a pure exegesis of Chinese communist ideological writings. What matters is how ideology is used as a programme of action. Ideology is produced not as statements of truth, but to guide","PeriodicalId":45391,"journal":{"name":"China-An International Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"3 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/chn.2023.a898338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his seminal work Ideology and Organization in Communist China, first published in 1966, Franz Schurmann presented a comprehensive sociological analysis of the Communist Party of China’s (CPC) revolutionary construction of a “New China”. In his introduction, Schurmann highlights two main points. The first is that ideology and organisation condition each other. In Schurmann’s words, organisations are “structures of differentiated roles which require the ordered exercise of power”, while ideology is a “manner of thinking characteristic of an organization”. The second and even more important point is that ideology and organisation in communist China are different from “culture”, “ethos” or “social system”, which are shorthand for how things are. Ideology and organisation, however, are action-oriented. They form a “rational instrument to do a job”, with the job being the creation of a new system and culture to replace the old ones destroyed during the revolution. During the revolution, ideology and organisation were destructive tools, breaking down the old system and elite; after the revolution, the CPC turned to the same instruments, making them into productive tools in the creation of a new society, culture and elite. Action and power are keywords in Schurmann’s work, and are drawn from an American sociological tradition inspired by Max Weber that prominently includes Talcott Parsons. Schurmann maintains that there is little sense in a pure exegesis of Chinese communist ideological writings. What matters is how ideology is used as a programme of action. Ideology is produced not as statements of truth, but to guide
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意识形态、组织权力与中国共产党统治的自然化
在其1966年首次出版的开创性著作《共产主义中国的意识形态与组织》中,弗朗茨·舒曼对中国共产党对“新中国”的革命建设进行了全面的社会学分析。在他的引言中,Schurmann强调了两个要点。首先,意识形态和组织是相互制约的。用舒曼的话来说,组织是“不同角色的结构,需要有秩序地行使权力”,而意识形态是“组织特有的思维方式”。第二点,也是更重要的一点是,在共产主义中国,意识形态和组织不同于“文化”、“风气”或“社会制度”,这些都是事物的缩影。然而,意识形态和组织是以行动为导向的。它们形成了“完成一项工作的理性工具”,其任务是创造一种新的制度和文化,以取代在革命中被摧毁的旧制度和文化。在革命期间,意识形态和组织是破坏旧制度和精英的破坏性工具;革命后,中国共产党转向了同样的工具,使它们成为创造新社会、新文化和新精英的生产工具。行动和权力是舒曼作品中的关键词,它们来自马克斯·韦伯启发的美国社会学传统,其中包括塔尔科特·帕森斯。舒曼认为,对中国共产主义意识形态著作进行纯粹的注释是没有意义的。重要的是如何将意识形态用作行动纲领。意识形态不是作为真理的陈述而产生的,而是用来指导的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
How the "Rise of Great Power" Restrains Bilateral Trade Flows: Evidence from China and its Trading Partners Layering Ideologies from Deng Xiaoping to Xi Jinping: Tracing Ideological Changes of the Communist Party of China Using Text Analysis China–Asean Relations January 2023 To March 2023: Important Documents When Top-down Meets Bottom-up: Understanding the Logic and Dynamics of Responsive Authoritarianism, based on Central Environmental Inspection in China Afterword and Reflections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1