Association Between Hormone Therapy and Weight Gain in the Menopause Transition and After Menopause: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Isabela G. Murbach, Vitória F. M. Martins, Milena M. Cristófalo, Érika T. Fukunaga, José M. Aldrighi
{"title":"Association Between Hormone Therapy and Weight Gain in the Menopause Transition and After Menopause: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Isabela G. Murbach, Vitória F. M. Martins, Milena M. Cristófalo, Érika T. Fukunaga, José M. Aldrighi","doi":"10.36311/jhgd.v33.14764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to assess whether hormone therapy (HT) increases weight in women in the menopausal transition and after menopause.\nMethod: this article proposes an update to the systematic review published in 2005 by the Cochrane Library (Kongnyuy EJ et al 2005) with reference to studies assessing weight changes in women receiving HT from 1986 to 2005. Following PRISMA recommendations, we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ) from May 2005 onwards from Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Two authors independently assessed the risk of biases in the selected studies.\nResults: ten RCTs were included, totaling 2,588 HT users and 764 non-users. Different regimens, dosages, and routes of administration in HT users were analyzed and compared to non-users. The results did not show statistically significant differences for most of the HT regimens evaluated. There was significant weight gain only in patients using EEC alone at dosages of 0.45 mg/day and 0.3 mg/day when compared to placebo (p 0.01); as well as in patients receiving esto-progestative combinations of 0.5 mg/day 17-beta-estradiol (E2) + 100 mg/day progesterone, with a 0.7 kg weight increase (p 0.032). On the other hand, the combinations of 1 mg/day estradiol valerate + 3 mg/day drospirenone showed a -1.0 kg reduction (p = 0.04), whereas a -0.2 kg reduction (p = 0.001) was identified in patients using 1 mg /day estradiol (E) + 0.5 mg norethisterone acetate (NETA). Tibolone therapy showed no statistically significant changes in weight. After performing a meta-analysis, the comparative results between users and non-users showed that there was a slight weight increase (+0.279 kg ; CI -1.71 to 2.27) in patients using 0.625 mg/day conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) + 2.5 mg/day medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). As for the patients receiving 2.5 mg/day Tibolone, weight gain (+0.670 kg; CI from -1.14 to 2.48) was also observed in them. However, these increases were not significant when compared to non-HT users.\nConclusions: most regimens studied showed that patients using HT in the menopausal transition and after menopause did not show significant weight gain. The only combination that showed weight gain was 0.5 mg/day 17-beta-estradiol (E2) + 100 mg/day progesterone observed, while there was weight reduction in patients using 1 mg/day estradiol valerate + 3 mg/day drospirenone and 1 mg/day estradiol (E) + norethisterone acetate.","PeriodicalId":35218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Growth and Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Growth and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v33.14764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to assess whether hormone therapy (HT) increases weight in women in the menopausal transition and after menopause. Method: this article proposes an update to the systematic review published in 2005 by the Cochrane Library (Kongnyuy EJ et al 2005) with reference to studies assessing weight changes in women receiving HT from 1986 to 2005. Following PRISMA recommendations, we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ) from May 2005 onwards from Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Two authors independently assessed the risk of biases in the selected studies. Results: ten RCTs were included, totaling 2,588 HT users and 764 non-users. Different regimens, dosages, and routes of administration in HT users were analyzed and compared to non-users. The results did not show statistically significant differences for most of the HT regimens evaluated. There was significant weight gain only in patients using EEC alone at dosages of 0.45 mg/day and 0.3 mg/day when compared to placebo (p 0.01); as well as in patients receiving esto-progestative combinations of 0.5 mg/day 17-beta-estradiol (E2) + 100 mg/day progesterone, with a 0.7 kg weight increase (p 0.032). On the other hand, the combinations of 1 mg/day estradiol valerate + 3 mg/day drospirenone showed a -1.0 kg reduction (p = 0.04), whereas a -0.2 kg reduction (p = 0.001) was identified in patients using 1 mg /day estradiol (E) + 0.5 mg norethisterone acetate (NETA). Tibolone therapy showed no statistically significant changes in weight. After performing a meta-analysis, the comparative results between users and non-users showed that there was a slight weight increase (+0.279 kg ; CI -1.71 to 2.27) in patients using 0.625 mg/day conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) + 2.5 mg/day medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). As for the patients receiving 2.5 mg/day Tibolone, weight gain (+0.670 kg; CI from -1.14 to 2.48) was also observed in them. However, these increases were not significant when compared to non-HT users. Conclusions: most regimens studied showed that patients using HT in the menopausal transition and after menopause did not show significant weight gain. The only combination that showed weight gain was 0.5 mg/day 17-beta-estradiol (E2) + 100 mg/day progesterone observed, while there was weight reduction in patients using 1 mg/day estradiol valerate + 3 mg/day drospirenone and 1 mg/day estradiol (E) + norethisterone acetate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绝经过渡期和绝经后激素治疗与体重增加的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:进行系统综述和荟萃分析,以评估激素治疗(HT)是否会增加更年期过渡期和绝经后女性的体重。方法:本文对Cochrane图书馆2005年发表的系统综述(Kongnyuy-EJ等人,2005年)进行了更新,参考了评估1986年至2005年接受HT治疗的女性体重变化的研究。根据PRISMA的建议,我们纳入了从2005年5月起来自Medline、Embase和Cochrane CENTRAL数据库的随机对照试验(RCT)。计算标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)。两位作者独立评估了所选研究中存在偏见的风险。结果:纳入10项随机对照试验,共2588名HT使用者和764名非使用者。对HT使用者的不同给药方案、剂量和给药途径进行了分析,并与非使用者进行了比较。对于大多数评估的HT方案,结果没有显示出统计学上的显著差异。与安慰剂相比,仅在剂量为0.45 mg/天和0.3 mg/天的单独使用EEC的患者中体重显著增加(p 0.01);以及接受0.5 mg/天17β-雌二醇(E2)+100 mg/天孕酮的esto-proestate组合的患者,体重增加0.7公斤(p 0.032)。另一方面,1 mg/天戊酸雌二醇+3mg/天屈螺酮的组合显示体重减少-1.0公斤(p=0.04),而在使用1毫克/天雌二醇(E)+0.5毫克醋酸炔诺酮(NETA)的患者中发现了-0.2公斤的减少(p=0.001)。替勃龙治疗显示体重没有统计学上的显著变化。在进行荟萃分析后,使用者和非使用者之间的比较结果显示,使用0.625 mg/天的共轭马雌激素(CEE)+2.5 mg/天醋酸甲羟孕酮(MPA)的患者体重略有增加(+0.279kg;CI-1.71至2.27)。对于接受2.5 mg/天替勃龙治疗的患者,也观察到他们的体重增加(+0.670 kg;CI从-1.14到2.48)。然而,与非HT用户相比,这些增长并不显著。结论:大多数研究方案表明,在更年期过渡期和绝经后使用HT的患者体重没有显著增加。唯一显示体重增加的组合是0.5 mg/天观察到的17β-雌二醇(E2)+100 mg/天孕酮,而使用1 mg/天戊酸雌二醇+3 mg/天屈螺酮和1 mg/天雌二醇(E)+醋酸炔诺酮的患者体重减轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Growth and Development
Journal of Human Growth and Development Social Sciences-Life-span and Life-course Studies
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Adherence to chest physiotherapy, airway clearance techniques and physical exercise by children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis Body mass index assessment of preschool children during the COVID-19 pandemic The influence of chemotherapy on nutritional status and oncological fatigue in cancer patients: Cross-sectional study Beyond ultra-processed foods: the new direction of the basic food basket in Brazil Epidemiological evolution of COVID-19: a three-year perspective on coping with the pandemic in the States of Rio Grande do Sul and Paraná, Southern Region of Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1