{"title":"Thinking about the Commons","authors":"Carol M. Rose","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3487612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article, originally a speech in the conference, Lecons de Droit Compare sur les Communs, Sciences-Po, Paris, explores current developments in theoretical thinking about the commons. It keys off contemporary reconsiderations of Garret Hardin’s “Tragedy of the Commons” and Elinor Ostrom’s response to Hardin in Governing the Commons and later work. Ostrom was among the best-known critics of Hardin’s idea of a “tragedy,” but Ostrom’s own work has also raised some questions in more recent commons literature. One key question is the very uncertain relationship between community-based resource control and democratic rights. A second key question revolves around the understanding of commons on the one hand as limited common regimes, central to Ostrom’s work, or as open access, as espoused by more recent advocates of widespread access to information and communications networks.","PeriodicalId":47250,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Commons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of the Commons","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3487612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
This article, originally a speech in the conference, Lecons de Droit Compare sur les Communs, Sciences-Po, Paris, explores current developments in theoretical thinking about the commons. It keys off contemporary reconsiderations of Garret Hardin’s “Tragedy of the Commons” and Elinor Ostrom’s response to Hardin in Governing the Commons and later work. Ostrom was among the best-known critics of Hardin’s idea of a “tragedy,” but Ostrom’s own work has also raised some questions in more recent commons literature. One key question is the very uncertain relationship between community-based resource control and democratic rights. A second key question revolves around the understanding of commons on the one hand as limited common regimes, central to Ostrom’s work, or as open access, as espoused by more recent advocates of widespread access to information and communications networks.
这篇文章最初是在巴黎科学院的Lecons de Droit Compare sur les Communits会议上发表的演讲,探讨了当前关于公域的理论思考的发展。它开启了对加勒特·哈丁的《下议院的悲剧》以及埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆在《治理下议院》和后来的作品中对哈丁的回应的当代反思。奥斯特罗姆是哈丁“悲剧”思想的最著名批评者之一,但奥斯特罗姆自己的作品也在最近的公共文学中提出了一些问题。一个关键问题是以社区为基础的资源控制与民主权利之间的关系非常不确定。第二个关键问题围绕着对公域的理解,一方面,公域是奥斯特罗姆工作的核心,是有限的共同制度,或者是开放获取,正如最近广泛获取信息和通信网络的倡导者所支持的那样。