The missing boys: Understanding the unbalanced sex ratio in South Africa, 1894–2011

Francisco J. Marco-Gracia, J. Fourie
{"title":"The missing boys: Understanding the unbalanced sex ratio in South Africa, 1894–2011","authors":"Francisco J. Marco-Gracia, J. Fourie","doi":"10.1080/20780389.2021.1987212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT At the beginning of the twentieth century in South Africa, the sex ratio for black children under five years was one of the lowest ever recorded. Sex ratios also differed markedly by racial group. Those for white children remained almost invariable, with more boys than girls, while black children had a clear majority of girls, a situation that the literature has almost completely overlooked. The reasons are still not completely clear. Although sex ratios at birth show more births of boys than girls, boys’ mortality was higher than girls’ mortality. Why boys’ mortality was so high and why, as a consequence, the twentieth-century under-five sex ratio for black children was so skewed towards girls, a ratio much lower, for example, than the sex ratios of pre-industrial European countries, remains unanswered. We suggest several possible explanations. The most likely explanation, we argue, was a preference for girls.","PeriodicalId":54115,"journal":{"name":"Economic History of Developing Regions","volume":"37 1","pages":"128 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic History of Developing Regions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20780389.2021.1987212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT At the beginning of the twentieth century in South Africa, the sex ratio for black children under five years was one of the lowest ever recorded. Sex ratios also differed markedly by racial group. Those for white children remained almost invariable, with more boys than girls, while black children had a clear majority of girls, a situation that the literature has almost completely overlooked. The reasons are still not completely clear. Although sex ratios at birth show more births of boys than girls, boys’ mortality was higher than girls’ mortality. Why boys’ mortality was so high and why, as a consequence, the twentieth-century under-five sex ratio for black children was so skewed towards girls, a ratio much lower, for example, than the sex ratios of pre-industrial European countries, remains unanswered. We suggest several possible explanations. The most likely explanation, we argue, was a preference for girls.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
失踪的男孩:了解1894-2011年南非性别比例失衡
在二十世纪初的南非,五岁以下黑人儿童的性别比例是有记录以来最低的。不同种族的性别比例也存在显著差异。白人孩子的情况几乎保持不变,男孩多于女孩,而黑人孩子的女孩明显占多数,这一情况几乎完全被文献所忽视。原因尚不完全清楚。虽然出生性别比显示男婴多于女婴,但男婴的死亡率高于女婴。为什么男孩的死亡率如此之高,以及为什么20世纪五岁以下黑人儿童的性别比例如此倾向于女孩,例如,这一比例远低于工业化前欧洲国家的性别比例,这些问题仍然没有答案。我们提出了几种可能的解释。我们认为,最可能的解释是对女孩的偏爱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Colonial agricultural estates and rural development in twentieth-century Mexico Mild Arabica coffee trade at a time of market regulation The sins of the church: The long-term impacts of Christian missionary praxis on HIV and sexual behaviour in Zambia Profits and inequality during an export boom. Evidence from tax records in Lima, Peru Like the swing of the pendulum: The history of government-sponsored rural settlements in São Paulo, Brazil (1820s–1920s)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1