Educational relational networks: indigenous and feminist worlding. A response to Troy Richardson

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Ethics and Education Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17449642.2023.2188755
Sharon Todd
{"title":"Educational relational networks: indigenous and feminist worlding. A response to Troy Richardson","authors":"Sharon Todd","doi":"10.1080/17449642.2023.2188755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper is a response to Troy Richardson’s Terence McLaughlin’s Lecture. In it, I discuss how Richardson provides a unique reading of relationality, drawing together technology studies, Indigenous Education and feminist philosophy of education. Seeking to walk with key ideas he develops, this response also points to a possible limitation in seeing Noddings ethic of care as part of a feminist relational ontology that can help inform new ways of understanding ‘machine learning’. In particular, I introduce the notion of worlding as a way of complementing Richardson’s reading of relationality – a notion that has profound implications for pedagogical practice.","PeriodicalId":45613,"journal":{"name":"Ethics and Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"23 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2023.2188755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper is a response to Troy Richardson’s Terence McLaughlin’s Lecture. In it, I discuss how Richardson provides a unique reading of relationality, drawing together technology studies, Indigenous Education and feminist philosophy of education. Seeking to walk with key ideas he develops, this response also points to a possible limitation in seeing Noddings ethic of care as part of a feminist relational ontology that can help inform new ways of understanding ‘machine learning’. In particular, I introduce the notion of worlding as a way of complementing Richardson’s reading of relationality – a notion that has profound implications for pedagogical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育关系网络:土著和女权主义世界。对Troy Richardson的回应
本文是对Troy Richardson的Terence McLaughlin讲座的回应。在这本书中,我讨论了理查森如何将技术研究、土著教育和女权主义教育哲学结合起来,提供了一种独特的关系解读。为了与他发展的关键思想同行,这一回应还指出,将Noddings护理伦理视为女权主义关系本体论的一部分可能存在局限性,这有助于为理解“机器学习”的新方式提供信息。特别是,我引入了世界化的概念,作为对理查森对关系性解读的补充——这一概念对教学实践有着深远的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics and Education
Ethics and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Situated knowledge between purposes and facts and its relation to pedagogical tact Transforming relationships. Pedagogical tact as a utopian figure of mediation Tactlessness as condition for teaching tact: educational reflections based on Adorno Theorising education from within pedagogical tact: a matter of singularity, attunement, and rules-as-not-rules Parents as psychological coaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1