Phenomenological Enthymeme in V.N. Voloshinov’s Marxist Sociology of Poetics. Using the Example of an Article titled “Word in Life and Word in Poetry...”

Q3 Social Sciences Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal Pub Date : 2022-03-29 DOI:10.19181/socjour.2022.28.1.8842
A. Malinkin
{"title":"Phenomenological Enthymeme in V.N. Voloshinov’s Marxist Sociology of Poetics. Using the Example of an Article titled “Word in Life and Word in Poetry...”","authors":"A. Malinkin","doi":"10.19181/socjour.2022.28.1.8842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the example of the article “Word in Life and Word in Poetry. On the Issues of Sociological Poetics” (1926), the author analyzes the sociological methodology used by V.N. Voloshinov (M.M. Bakhtin) in a number of publications in the 1920’s and first utilized in this article. The methodology is declared to be Marxist. It is proven that it cannot be unequivocally identified with the Marxist variety, since it does not fully correspond to the fundamental principles of the teachings of K. Marx and F. Engels. The Voloshinov-Bakhtin methodology reveals a conceptual and subject-thematic affinity with Max Scheler’s phenomenological sociology. The author believes that the article attempts to combine two philosophical methodologies within a single humanitarian-scientific study. A double comparative analysis is conducted by the author in the context of the results of researching the life and work of M.M. Bakhtin in order to expand the cultural and scientific research space in the history of Russian philosophical sociology.","PeriodicalId":35261,"journal":{"name":"Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2022.28.1.8842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

On the example of the article “Word in Life and Word in Poetry. On the Issues of Sociological Poetics” (1926), the author analyzes the sociological methodology used by V.N. Voloshinov (M.M. Bakhtin) in a number of publications in the 1920’s and first utilized in this article. The methodology is declared to be Marxist. It is proven that it cannot be unequivocally identified with the Marxist variety, since it does not fully correspond to the fundamental principles of the teachings of K. Marx and F. Engels. The Voloshinov-Bakhtin methodology reveals a conceptual and subject-thematic affinity with Max Scheler’s phenomenological sociology. The author believes that the article attempts to combine two philosophical methodologies within a single humanitarian-scientific study. A double comparative analysis is conducted by the author in the context of the results of researching the life and work of M.M. Bakhtin in order to expand the cultural and scientific research space in the history of Russian philosophical sociology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沃洛希诺夫马克思主义诗学社会学中的现象学热情。举一篇题为“生活中的文字与诗歌中的文字…”的文章为例
以《生活中的话语与诗歌中的话语——论社会学诗学问题》(1926)一文为例,分析了沃洛希诺夫(M.M.Bakhtin)在20世纪20年代的许多出版物中使用的、本文首次使用的社会学方法论。这种方法论被认为是马克思主义的。事实证明,它不能明确地与马克思主义的多样性相一致,因为它不完全符合马克思和恩格斯的基本教义。沃洛希诺夫-巴赫金方法论揭示了与马克斯·舍勒现象学社会学在概念和主题上的密切关系。作者认为,这篇文章试图将两种哲学方法结合在一个单一的人道主义科学研究中。为了拓展俄罗斯哲学社会学史上的文化和科学研究空间,作者结合对巴赫金生平和工作的研究成果,进行了双重比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal
Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊介绍: “Sotsiologicheskij Zhurnal” publishes the articles on sociological disciplines. Interdisciplinary studies in sociology and related disciplines, such as social psychology, cultural studies, anthropology, ethnography, etc. — are also welcomed. The main emphasis is on the fundamental research in the field of theory, methodology and history of sociology. The regular rubric highlights the results of mass surveys and case studies. The rubric “Discussion”, which debated the controversial issues of sociological research, is regular as well. The journal publishes book reviews, and summaries, as well as lists of new books in Russian and English, which represent the main areas of interdisciplinary research in the social sciences. The journal aims to not only play samples of knowledge, considered regulatory and standards of internal expertise in the professional community, but also aims for opportunities to improve them. These rules, a tough selection and decision to print only a small portion of incoming materials allow “Sotsiologicheskij Zhurnal” contribute to improving the quality of sociological research. Submitted manuscripts should show a high integrity in problem setting, problem analysis and correspond to the journal’s thematic profile and its scientific priorities.
期刊最新文献
Theoretical Approaches Towards Studying Motivation for Surrogate Motherhood A Person that Feels, Values, and Studies Time. Professor Garold E. Zborovsky is 85 Years Old Is it Possible for a Society to Exist Without Development? Telemedicine in Russian Megacities: Problems and Prospects Batygin’s Lesson stuck with me on my Professional Path — Always Check Yourself to Make Sure your Conclusions Can Be Substantiated”. Interview Prepared by D.M. Rogozin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1